Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

So Citigroup just got a $20 Billion bail out with no begging..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:23 PM
  #1  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
So Citigroup just got a $20 Billion bail out with no begging..

But the big 3 are forced to jump though many hoops and still have nothing....anyone see a double standard here.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
mdenz3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,173
GM just needs to buy better politicians.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #3  
UnknownWarrior's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 85
From: Arlington Texas
Originally Posted by Z28x
But the big 3 are forced to jump though many hoops and still have nothing....anyone see a double standard here.
yea its bull**** i hate congress
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #4  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Well the bailout was conceived in the first place to help the financial industry and not any company looking for a hand out like the Big 3 so no I don't see a double std. You can plug any financial institution in there to make this post, like AIG perhaps, at least I'm not getting to go on an overseas hunting trip, now that's BS
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #5  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Question

Originally Posted by Z28x
But the big 3 are forced to jump though many hoops and still have nothing....anyone see a double standard here.
Hmm I wonder where such a double standard might come from?
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #6  
Blue89Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,413
From: Marlton NJ
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
Well the bailout was conceived in the first place to help the financial industry and not any company looking for a hand out like the Big 3 so no I don't see a double std. You can plug any financial institution in there to make this post, like AIG perhaps, at least I'm not getting to go on an overseas hunting trip, now that's BS

actually, the bailout was originally to buy the toxic assets, which they have yet to do yet.

And the bailout was also just as much to unlock the countries credit and get them to lend money to people as it was to save the financial firms.

They have yet to start lending.

Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #7  
MENEGRANDE's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 287
From: Land of George Ryan
the administration has some good buddies in wall street...
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Lightbulb

Right! Show me the money! Where is it going. Maybe they need it for some more concentration camps?
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #9  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by mdenz3
GM just needs to buy better politicians.
Yeah but what will they want in return?
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #10  
ulakovic22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,872
From: Lantana, TX
Originally Posted by Blue89Bird
actually, the bailout was originally to buy the toxic assets, which they have yet to do yet.

And the bailout was also just as much to unlock the countries credit and get them to lend money to people as it was to save the financial firms.

They have yet to start lending.

I'm glad they decided not to buy up bad mortgages and instead are injecting capital into banks by buying stock. Guess what, the gov can later sell the stock and make money, the quesiton is will they charge themselves the capital gains tax and windfall tax, LOL!

How do you think you are suppose to get banks to start lending? You have to give them capital first and then the confidence that if they lend to someone who goes bankrupt they won't lose their money which is what gauranteeing banks does.

You're right about the not lending part though, credit has loosened up a little but if you are expecting it to get back to where it was it never will. The loose standards of lending to anyone who asks is why we are here in the first place.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 05:23 PM
  #11  
Chrome383Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,043
From: Shelbyville, IN
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
You're right about the not lending part though, credit has loosened up a little but if you are expecting it to get back to where it was it never will. The loose standards of lending to anyone who asks is why we are here in the first place.
Exactly. Although, leave it to wall street and greedy bastards to do it all over again another 50-80 years from now.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 05:28 PM
  #12  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Lightbulb

Does anyone think it's strange that banks need to borrow $? Don't they have everyone's $$$$ as it is? It just seems a little bit ridiculous to me!
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 05:31 PM
  #13  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by SCNGENNFTHGEN
Hmm I wonder where such a double standard might come from?
Financial services was decided back in the 80's to be Americas golden child industry.


Seemed like a good idea at the time I suppose , no one gets there hands all greasy.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #14  
shock6906's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,577
From: Sandy VJJville
Originally Posted by ulakovic22
Well the bailout was conceived in the first place to help the financial industry and not any company looking for a hand out like the Big 3 so no I don't see a double std. You can plug any financial institution in there to make this post, like AIG perhaps, at least I'm not getting to go on an overseas hunting trip, now that's BS
The Big 3 are not looking for a handout. They were/are looking for a loan, not free money. The fact that the big 3 have had to go through so many interviews, questions, badgering by congress, but any of these financial institutions can just say "Hey, I need a few billion dollars too!" and they just get it is a big f**king double standard to me.
Old Nov 24, 2008 | 05:42 PM
  #15  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Z28x
Financial services was decided back in the 80's to be Americas golden child industry.


Seemed like a good idea at the time I suppose , no one gets there hands all greasy.
Sometime you just gotta get your hands greasy man.....So all they have to do is make $$$$$$ on other peoples $! WOW...real tough job!! Seems kinda hard to **** up to me! The auto industry has ALOT more to do, and alot of things working against them. They aren't just handed $$$$$ from everwhere like the banks are! What they have to do to make a profit is ALOT harder than what the banks have to do! This double standard you speak of, IS IMHO directly related to the constant lambasting by the CABAL I've been bitchin' about for so many years...

Last edited by SCNGENNFTHGEN; Dec 1, 2008 at 05:06 PM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.