Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Since Impala Stays FWD

Old Jan 30, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #31  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
Originally Posted by blckbrd84
But yet the 3.5L OHV/6spd combo in the Vue actually gets slightly less MPG then the 3.6L DOHC/6spd combo.

Perhaps more gearing differences then engine differences?
3.5 Vue is AWD only (15/22); 3.6 Vue is available either way; 3.6 AWD is rated 16/22. Probably gets slightly better city fuel economy due to the 4,300+ lb weight. Good example of the potential for a more powerful engine to improve mileage; the smaller, less powerful engine has to work harder to get a heavy vehicle like this moving from a standing start (in-city driving).
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #32  
routesixtysixer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 669
From: Arcadia, OK
Originally Posted by Plague
The Pontiac G8 V6 weighs 3885lbs.
Length 196.1
Width 74.8
Height 57.7
Head Room Front 38.7
Head Room Rear 38.0
Shoulder Room Front 59.1
Shoulder Room Rear 59.1
Hip Room Front 56.7
Hip Room Rear 58.0
Leg Room Front 42.2
Leg Room Rear 39.4
17/25 MPG

Impala V6
Length 200.4
Width 72.9
Height 58.7
Head Room Front 39.4
Head Room Rear 37.8
Shoulder Room Front 58.7
Shoulder Room Rear 58.6
Hip Room Front 56.4
Hip Room Rear 57.2
Leg Room Front 42.3
Leg Room Rear 37.6
18/28 MPG

The G8 V6 is smaller, weighs more, and gets worse mileage. How did this happen?
G8 isn't really "smaller", just less space efficient due to rear-drive configuration. A bit shorter, but 2-inches wider. And gas mileage deficiency is probably due to the fact that it weighs more (in part because it's rear-drive) and is tuned more for performance than the 3.5 Impala, which I would imagine is aimed more at conservative folks that value mileage as a higher priority.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 11:45 AM
  #33  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
In all honesty, the Commodore is smaller but has the same space as the larger Impala. G8 also has a 261hp V6 vs a 211hp V6 in the Impala. Compare the 3.9 to the G8 V6, see the mpg difference.

G8 also has a larger DOHC V6 as well as 5spd auto trans.
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #34  
FS3800's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,028
From: Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Plague
The G8 V6 is smaller, weighs more, and gets worse mileage. How did this happen?
the G8 is smaller externally.. but seems to have more interior room in more places than the Impala has more than the G8... according to the numbers you psoted

just guessing.. but the G8's DOHC v6 is probably a bigger (externally not displacement) engine, and thus probably heavier.. that and the extra drivetrain components required for RWD over FWD could add to drivetrain parasitic loss due to friction.. not to mention adding weight

so.. the G8 is smaller outside, bigger inside (in most measurements)...

but it is heavier and since it's RWD sufferes more drivetrain loss of efficiency.. so it has lower MPG
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nayr
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Mar 3, 2023 08:34 PM
bunker
Parts For Sale
2
Jan 30, 2016 08:09 PM
95chwagon
Parts For Sale
5
Oct 16, 2015 12:24 PM
68camaroboltz
Fuel and Ignition
2
Oct 5, 2015 01:46 PM
Dark Zeiro
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Jul 19, 2015 08:25 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:25 PM.