Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

REPORT: Corvette C7 Coming in 2012 as a 2013 model

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #61  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
And I'm sure 450 hp would be a cakewalk with DI from 6.2L (or less), since the LS3 is basically there already.
Try again.

The DI LS2 prototype, according to one of the engineers, produced "well north of 450hp". This was a 6.2L engine. The LS2 put out 66.7hp/liter. The LS3 69.4hp/liter. Assume the prototype made 475hp, 76.6hp/liter - or a 10% improvement, which is reasonable. GM increased power output 5% by going to the LS3 without variable tech or DI. Think a variable cam could add another than 5%? I think easily. But lets say just 5%. That means a 6.2L GenV makes 500hp. Could even be higher. In theory, a dry sump 6.2L GenV just made the LS7 obsolete - just as recent base Vette motors obsoleted the high-end Vette motor of the previous generation.

A 440hp "LS3 replacement" motor at that point could be about what.... 5.5 liters? And a 400hp "L98" replacmement could be about.... 4.9 liters? Ever heard either of those displacements around genV motors before?

Originally Posted by Ken S
I'd be impressed enough if GM outfits the base pushrod V8's with a 7000 rpm redline from what they learned from the LS7.
Bad idea. The base engine is going to be more expensive than the LS3 it replaces. The tech to run 7000rpm would increase cost too much.

Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
What's wrong with the ride quality of the Corvette driving around town?
I think its just fine. But when you compare a Z06 to a Ferrari, the Ferrari usually rides a little nicer (so sayeth the big rags and places like Top Gear). Those Ferrari owners dont have much to brag about anymore .

Originally Posted by DAKMOR
i just want the most fuel efficient V8 i can get with enough power to equal LS1s.
With 330hp+ V6s in our future (LS1 territory) there is no reason to have a sub 400hp V8.

Last edited by Geoff Chadwick; Aug 14, 2009 at 02:49 PM.
Old Aug 14, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #62  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
Bad idea. The base engine is going to be more expensive than the LS3 it replaces. The tech to run 7000rpm would increase cost too much.
Well, I'd argue that's what people probably said about the the current LS3 Vette 6600 rpm redline on a pushrod engine 20 years back too. Remember when the LS1 came out, people were impressed at the 6200 rpm redline? Now look where we are now. As an armchair engineer/product dreamer, I refuse to default on the "that too expensive" response when it comes to moving current high end tech to the masses in the next major iteration.... if anything, its not as fun.

Anyways, that's why I'd say I'd be impressed if GM did figure out a way to make it cost effective for a base engine (for the Vette at least) with a 7k red line, cause it would be impressive.

EDIT: Extra points for anyone that can graphically map the redline of the pushrod engines used in the base Corvette over the years and generations.

Last edited by Ken S; Aug 14, 2009 at 03:34 PM.
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 04:31 PM
  #63  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Wink

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
And FWIW, I don't want an 8000 rpm motor either. I've got one in my Cobra, and while it moves pretty good, finding a tranny that will shift that high under full power (I'm kind of rough on trannies) negates any chance of a truly street-friendly setup at anything coming close to resembling a reasonable cost.
Originally Posted by AdioSS
http://wot.motortrend.com/6475908/au...014/index.html

Doesn't it make sense that the Corvette would be the first GM car to get this transmission?

The 453hp 3600# Ferrari California uses a rear mounted, 7 speed dual clutch transaxle.
Originally Posted by JakeRobb
I trust that if GM built an 8000 rpm motor, they'd pair it with a transmission that could handle the workload (and/or cripple it with torque management ).
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
Hey - it might be the cat's meow. So long as it is efficient, and can handle full-throttle, high-rpm powershifts like my face-toothed G-Force T5....while being street friendly at the same time....I'm in like Flynn!
https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=705328


1+1=2
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #64  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
That's an automatic - I'm only interested in a manual.

1 x 1 = 1.
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 04:55 AM
  #65  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
Talking

you can manually pull the shift levers
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 01:00 PM
  #66  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Ya. I suppose.
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 02:15 PM
  #67  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
With 330hp+ V6s in our future (LS1 territory) there is no reason to have a sub 400hp V8.
Until someone is building a 330hp V6 that makes 375 lb-ft of peak torque, and sustains 300 lb-ft or more from 2000 rpm all the way to redline, it is not in "LS1 territory".

Originally Posted by AdioSS
you can manually pull the shift levers
It's not the same and you know it.
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 02:16 PM
  #68  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
Try again.

The DI LS2 prototype, according to one of the engineers, produced "well north of 450hp". This was a 6.2L engine. The LS2 put out 66.7hp/liter. The LS3 69.4hp/liter. Assume the prototype made 475hp, 76.6hp/liter - or a 10% improvement, which is reasonable. GM increased power output 5% by going to the LS3 without variable tech or DI. Think a variable cam could add another than 5%? I think easily. But lets say just 5%. That means a 6.2L GenV makes 500hp. Could even be higher. In theory, a dry sump 6.2L GenV just made the LS7 obsolete - just as recent base Vette motors obsoleted the high-end Vette motor of the previous generation.

A 440hp "LS3 replacement" motor at that point could be about what.... 5.5 liters? And a 400hp "L98" replacmement could be about.... 4.9 liters? Ever heard either of those displacements around genV motors before?
Try what again? Like I said, 450 hp is a cakewalk. I wasn't saying it would actually only make 450 hp... That was just a number in reference to the weightower ratio that the article discussed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bonniew
Events and Cruise Spots
0
Jan 18, 2015 01:14 PM
jayblev95
Track Kill Stories
3
Jan 15, 2015 07:48 AM
Red97LT1
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
9
Dec 17, 2014 06:13 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 4, 2014 11:56 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:23 AM.