REPORT: Corvette C7 Coming in 2012 as a 2013 model

The DI LS2 prototype, according to one of the engineers, produced "well north of 450hp". This was a 6.2L engine. The LS2 put out 66.7hp/liter. The LS3 69.4hp/liter. Assume the prototype made 475hp, 76.6hp/liter - or a 10% improvement, which is reasonable. GM increased power output 5% by going to the LS3 without variable tech or DI. Think a variable cam could add another than 5%? I think easily. But lets say just 5%. That means a 6.2L GenV makes 500hp. Could even be higher. In theory, a dry sump 6.2L GenV just made the LS7 obsolete - just as recent base Vette motors obsoleted the high-end Vette motor of the previous generation.
A 440hp "LS3 replacement" motor at that point could be about what.... 5.5 liters? And a 400hp "L98" replacmement could be about.... 4.9 liters? Ever heard either of those displacements around genV motors before?
Originally Posted by Ken S
I'd be impressed enough if GM outfits the base pushrod V8's with a 7000 rpm redline from what they learned from the LS7.
Originally Posted by Northwest94Z
What's wrong with the ride quality of the Corvette driving around town?
.
Originally Posted by DAKMOR
i just want the most fuel efficient V8 i can get with enough power to equal LS1s.
Last edited by Geoff Chadwick; Aug 14, 2009 at 02:49 PM.

Anyways, that's why I'd say I'd be impressed if GM did figure out a way to make it cost effective for a base engine (for the Vette at least) with a 7k red line, cause it would be impressive.
EDIT: Extra points for anyone that can graphically map the redline of the pushrod engines used in the base Corvette over the years and generations.
Last edited by Ken S; Aug 14, 2009 at 03:34 PM.
And FWIW, I don't want an 8000 rpm motor either. I've got one in my Cobra, and while it moves pretty good, finding a tranny that will shift that high under full power (I'm kind of rough on trannies) negates any chance of a truly street-friendly setup at anything coming close to resembling a reasonable cost.
http://wot.motortrend.com/6475908/au...014/index.html
Doesn't it make sense that the Corvette would be the first GM car to get this transmission?
The 453hp 3600# Ferrari California uses a rear mounted, 7 speed dual clutch transaxle.

Doesn't it make sense that the Corvette would be the first GM car to get this transmission?
The 453hp 3600# Ferrari California uses a rear mounted, 7 speed dual clutch transaxle.


1+1=2
It's not the same and you know it.
Try again. 
The DI LS2 prototype, according to one of the engineers, produced "well north of 450hp". This was a 6.2L engine. The LS2 put out 66.7hp/liter. The LS3 69.4hp/liter. Assume the prototype made 475hp, 76.6hp/liter - or a 10% improvement, which is reasonable. GM increased power output 5% by going to the LS3 without variable tech or DI. Think a variable cam could add another than 5%? I think easily. But lets say just 5%. That means a 6.2L GenV makes 500hp. Could even be higher. In theory, a dry sump 6.2L GenV just made the LS7 obsolete - just as recent base Vette motors obsoleted the high-end Vette motor of the previous generation.
A 440hp "LS3 replacement" motor at that point could be about what.... 5.5 liters? And a 400hp "L98" replacmement could be about.... 4.9 liters? Ever heard either of those displacements around genV motors before?

The DI LS2 prototype, according to one of the engineers, produced "well north of 450hp". This was a 6.2L engine. The LS2 put out 66.7hp/liter. The LS3 69.4hp/liter. Assume the prototype made 475hp, 76.6hp/liter - or a 10% improvement, which is reasonable. GM increased power output 5% by going to the LS3 without variable tech or DI. Think a variable cam could add another than 5%? I think easily. But lets say just 5%. That means a 6.2L GenV makes 500hp. Could even be higher. In theory, a dry sump 6.2L GenV just made the LS7 obsolete - just as recent base Vette motors obsoleted the high-end Vette motor of the previous generation.
A 440hp "LS3 replacement" motor at that point could be about what.... 5.5 liters? And a 400hp "L98" replacmement could be about.... 4.9 liters? Ever heard either of those displacements around genV motors before?
ower ratio that the article discussed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bonniew
Events and Cruise Spots
0
Jan 18, 2015 01:14 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Dec 4, 2014 11:56 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM



).