Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

"Power Lock" torque converter boosts mileage 46%?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-24-2008, 09:33 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
routesixtysixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arcadia, OK
Posts: 669
"Power Lock" torque converter boosts mileage 46%?

http://newsok.com/fuel-saving-conver...rticle/3301885
Wed September 24, 2008
Fuel-saving converter’s results drive optimism
By Debbie Blossom, Business Writer

With today’s fuel prices, a nationwide focus has shifted to vehicles that can squeeze more miles out of a tank of gasoline. And as American automakers push to produce cars and trucks sporting better gas mileage and fewer emissions, one local manufacturing company has created a fuel-saving converter that has proved it can produce better mileage while also helping improve air quality.

At Blumenthal Cos., a 59-year-old Oklahoma City company that remanufactures engines, a tested converter that boosts fuel savings came about almost by accident as the company grappled with extending the transmission lifespan on fleet trucks used by some of its customers. Robert Yarbrough, senior general manager of Blumenthal’s engines and automatics division, and employee Richard Walker were the chief designers who collaborated on the idea three years ago for a converter that would keep heavy-duty truck running longer. “At UPS, they were burning up transmissions at 40,000 miles, and the first converter we designed prolonged that to 120,000 miles,” Yarbrough said.

Test results show big savings from that initial discovery of fuel savings for big, half-ton trucks, next came designs that also would improve the performance of smaller, everyday vehicles. The company acquired a patent for its power lock converter system a year ago and since then has put it through tests on different cars and trucks to gauge actual savings. What they found was an increase in mileage from 24 percent to 59 percent depending on a vehicle’s make and model. Trucks have been the focus, Yarbrough said, “because there are so many more, and they are the biggest gas guzzlers.”

The company invested $30,000 for the converter’s patent and almost $275,000 just for converters for Ford engines. Its research determines that, so far, the converter can be installed in General Motors vehicles, Ford and Chrysler sport utility vehicles and rear-wheel drive cars, and Dodge diesel trucks. At $695 installed, the converter’s price “will pay for itself within six months in fuel savings,” Yarbrough said. Although Blumenthal just now is starting to market the converter, the company already is targeting cities and law enforcement agencies as potential customers. The converter is installed in two cars at both the Stillwater and Duncan police departments, as well as two cars used by the Oklahoma Highway Patrol.

What’s next for Blumenthal? All the converter’s parts are made in Oklahoma, Blumenthal marketing director Harry Brown said, but the company wants to take the product beyond state lines. “We’re trying to get companies like Napa Ford to pick this up to get the converter into the automotive aftermarket,” Yarbrough said, and the company is in discussion with Ford Motor Co. and Mopar, the parts division of Chrysler Corp. “The more we sell, the more we can put into research and development.” As the company works to bring heavy-duty engine applications to more car brands, it is also involved in research into other areas, including hydrogen fuel alternatives.

Test results
A 2003 Ford Crown Victoria was tested over 5,633 miles and showed a gas mileage increase of 44.7 percent; a 2000 Crown Victoria tested by the Duncan Police Department saw a gas mileage increase of 21 percent, and a 2004 model tested by the Comanche Nation police saw its gas mileage improve from 17.77 miles per gallon to 27.73 mpg, or 56 percent.

On average, vehicles tested for mileage with the converter had almost 14 mpg before the installation and 20.4 mpg after the converter was added, the company reported, bringing the average savings to 46.23 percent. Vehicles used 1,794 gallons of gas before adding the converter, and only 1,227 with the converter, a 25,000-mile test showed.
That’s an average of 567 gallons less per year, and calculated at $3.50 a gallon for gas, that’s a saving of $1,985.87 per vehicle each year.
Source: Blumenthal Cos.
Any theories as to how this could possibly work?
routesixtysixer is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 09:55 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
DAyers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Fresno, California USA
Posts: 101
Thumbs down

Sorry, but this sounds like snake oil to me. Auto manufacturers have been installing locking torque converters in their products since the early 1980s. I don't know how many different ways you can make a torque converter lock up but I doubt any one way would provide more efficiency than any other way.
DAyers is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 09:58 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Aaron91RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 163
I doubt it does.
ONLY think I can think of is they are tiny and weigh nothing. Less rotational weight.
Beyond that you can't really make it any more efficient then a lockup already is.
Aaron91RS is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 10:52 AM
  #4  
Koz
Registered User
 
Koz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 445
I have to agree with the above sentiments. While there is inneficiency in a torque converter, the designs are still pretty good. No way you could increase gas mileage 4x% by making the converter that last 5% efficient or so (I remember reading they were around 95% efficient?).

Maybe it locks up when the engine is idling, causing it to stall. When the engine's off you can't burn much gas
Koz is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 10:56 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
tireburnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,193
Sound like they "invented" a converter that is locked more than it is unlocked. More along the lines of an automatic clutch. Less slipping = less wasted work. If I locked my converter during 90% of driving it would improve my mileage.
tireburnin is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:19 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
R377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,712
As everyone else has been saying ... if they went from 14 to 20 mpg just because of a converter, they're basically saying the stock converter is somehow responsible for losing 6 mpg. Obviously that's not true. Unless the converter is positively affecting inefficiencies somewhere else in the drivetrain, but again, most everything is already optimized almost to their fullest (e.g. ratios).

The other odd thing is that it started out as a means to improve transmission life, which would likely point towards a less strict lockup program to prevent shock loads from slipping the tranny's clutches. But less lockup would degrade efficiency, not improve it. So count me firmly in the skeptical crowd.
R377 is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:34 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
km9v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Beaumont, TX
Posts: 1,295
Lower stall speed?
km9v is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 11:38 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
So then shouldn't manual trans cars get 40-50% better economy than the same car with an automatic?
Z28x is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QuickSilver02
Midwest
1
04-07-2015 11:12 AM
armedtrigger
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
02-24-2015 08:30 PM
StansZ28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
02-19-2015 07:39 AM
PCLZ28
Parts Wanted
0
02-12-2015 11:35 PM
Collector Car
Cars For Sale
0
12-17-2014 01:12 PM



Quick Reply: "Power Lock" torque converter boosts mileage 46%?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:21 AM.