Offical Cash for Clunkers Trade-In List...Are People Really This Stupid?
i just cant belive that someone would clunk a typhoon ,i mean WTF i would give my left nut for one of those , i have a very deep love for s-10's and blazers, who the hell would clunk a vette or any 8 cylinder camaro, i wonder how many tuned port injection 3rd gens got clunked
(
(The restoration would cost more than the restored car would be worth.
All you had to do with CfC was get the car to the lot under its own power.
i just cant belive that someone would clunk a typhoon ,i mean WTF i would give my left nut for one of those , i have a very deep love for s-10's and blazers, who the hell would clunk a vette or any 8 cylinder camaro, i wonder how many tuned port injection 3rd gens got clunked
(
(1. If someone could sell those for more money, why didn't they?
2. If one of those showed up at a dealer as a "clunker", there isn't likely a car dealer on earth who would have gone through the headache of filing the paperwork on a C4C program when he could have simply given the person the whosesale value on the vehicle towards a new car, and sold the thing at a healthy profit.
3. Keep in mind, the only operational requirements were that the vehicle ran, was continuously insured for a year. That leaves alot of room for junk.
I greatly doubt that GNX was anywhere near a shiny, showroom condition, highly desirable or easily refurbished vehicle we may inagine it to be.
Last edited by guionM; Oct 4, 2009 at 12:42 PM.
Exactly!
Again, I would give take some of those "junked" models with a grain of salt.
1. If someone could sell those for more money, why didn't they?
2. If one of those showed up at a dealer as a "clunker", there isn't likely a car dealer on earth who would have gone through the headache of filing the paperwork on a C4C program when he could have simply given the person the whosesale value on the vehicle towards a new car, and sold the thing at a healthy profit.
3. Keep in mind, the only operational requirements were that the vehicle ran, was continuously insured for a year. That leaves alot of room for junk.
I greatly doubt that GNX was anywhere near a shiny, showroom condition, highly desirable or easily refurbished vehicle we may inagine it to be.
Again, I would give take some of those "junked" models with a grain of salt.
1. If someone could sell those for more money, why didn't they?
2. If one of those showed up at a dealer as a "clunker", there isn't likely a car dealer on earth who would have gone through the headache of filing the paperwork on a C4C program when he could have simply given the person the whosesale value on the vehicle towards a new car, and sold the thing at a healthy profit.
3. Keep in mind, the only operational requirements were that the vehicle ran, was continuously insured for a year. That leaves alot of room for junk.
I greatly doubt that GNX was anywhere near a shiny, showroom condition, highly desirable or easily refurbished vehicle we may inagine it to be.
im not sayin that they would worth a crap some of them but the parts on them are worth a pretty penny to owners of the typhoons and GNX's , they wouldnt let them strip them of anything good they had to just crush the whole thing
This isn't true. The engine has to be seized, but other salvageable parts can be removed. The whole of the vehicle does have to be crushed within six months of the filing, but they can be stripped first.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
surreybrad
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 29, 2015 09:00 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Sep 14, 2015 09:20 AM



.
