Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

On / Off Skip Shift Button

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 06:22 PM
  #16  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
I have no problems with skip shift. I know a lot of people that really don't have a problem with it - and those that do get a CAGS eliminator. Easy as pie.

On terms of a manual switch, I do not know about that. If there was such a switch, it would likely be integrated into the traction/transmission/stability switch, simply engaging or disengaging when the driver wanted "sport". But at that point, you're going outside the CAGS range anyway, so it would be unnecessary to have a switch.

I'm more curious what happens if you drive a car with it and test the EPA rating and then disable it and test it again.
Old Dec 6, 2009 | 08:29 PM
  #17  
Chewbacca's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 859
From: AR (PA born and fled)
Originally Posted by King Moose SS
Now, I'm not absolutly postive, but I think if thats true, the new 5.0 Mustang will be the first Ford with Skip Shift. GM has used the application in a couple of vehicles in the past 5 years.
Skip shift's been around a bit longer than that for GM.

Like since at least... ohhh... the 1989 Corvette.
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 02:18 PM
  #18  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally Posted by jmsjags
wouldn't start/stop accelerate the wear on your engine? most engine wear occurs at startup does it not? i'd rather just use a little bit more gas and continue to run my engine for another 100k miles
Electric oil pump - problem solved.
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 03:52 PM
  #19  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by ProudPony
Electric oil pump - problem solved.
I don't really think such a change is necessary. I don't see how drain down and dry parts will be a result of sitting at a light with the ignition off.

With the latest EPA ruling on CO2 and the face off regarding Cap and Trade which will likely ensue, lots of measures regarding emissions will be institued, IMO.

Last edited by 1fastdog; Dec 8, 2009 at 04:00 PM.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 09:15 PM
  #20  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
I don't really think such a change is necessary. I don't see how drain down and dry parts will be a result of sitting at a light with the ignition off.

With the latest EPA ruling on CO2 and the face off regarding Cap and Trade which will likely ensue, lots of measures regarding emissions will be institued, IMO.
Agreed to the short-stop time period, but even if that were not the issue, think of the other benefits....
* Oil pump primes the system to 60psi while the fuel pumps are priming before initial starting, so you greatly reduce wear during the initial cold starts - for the life of the car.
* You gain back the parasitic losses that the mechanical pump takes away from the engine - just like racers and tuners using electric fans and electric water pumps. Every 5hp counts.
* Easier to track and adjust pressures to suit the engine/speed/need
* Potentially far easier to change or service - especially if it's external as it should be.
* DO the words "dry sump" mean anything to anyone...

You can go on and on.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:36 AM
  #21  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
I don't see the feds allowing the defeat of a feature that is key to hitting mileage numbers. CAGS is only an issue if you drive lightfooted and try to short shift.
When automatic transmissions have a sport mode, then I believe EPA makes the mfr do two runs and take some sort of average, do they not? Maybe Ford will negotiate something similar here.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:40 AM
  #22  
teal98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,132
From: Santa Clara, CA
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
I'm more curious what happens if you drive a car with it and test the EPA rating and then disable it and test it again.
It will be worse, because the engine will rev higher with lesser throttle openings ==> more friction. But I'm sure you already knew that. It would be good to quantify the difference, just to satisfy our curiousity. But it's probably substantial.

From what I understand, the shifting strategy in the EPA cycles assumes a robot shifting at fixed speeds, and that's why skip shift works so well. Of course, that's not the way I (or most other people, I think) drive a manual. I tend to shift as soon as I can without lugging. So for me, skip shift is a loser, as it requires I rev the car higher in 1st gear.
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #23  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by King Moose SS
So I just got finished arguing with a Ford buddy of mine about the Skip Shift. It was a intresting arguement and I feel it'll probobly come up again so I just wanted to know if any of you have some facts.

My buddy claimed that the upcoming 5.0 Mustang WILL have Skip Shift, since it will be just shy of Gas Guzzler standards. However he told me something intresting he claimed it will have a On & Off button similar to a traction controll on/off button on a car. SAE claimed that as long as the car starts with the skip shift on, it can give them higher gas mileage rating. Even though the driver can turn it off.

Now, I'm not absolutly postive, but I think if thats true, the new 5.0 Mustang will be the first Ford with Skip Shift. GM has used the application in a couple of vehicles in the past 5 years. So I was wondering, is there any chance GM will go this route, I think the on / off button would save alot of complaining from people who don't know about the skip shift until after they get the car.

1. The 5.0 Mustang isn't using skip/shift to avoid Gas Guzzler. Like you mention, it's using it to boost fuel economy.... it be notably higher than the current 4.6 despite having at least 80 more horsepower.

2. I can easily see Ford adding a bypass feature (button or otherwise), being that Ford pretty much takes the pulse of the Mustang community and all but runs everything they plan to do (or not do... ie: live axle) through them.


Trivia: the 4th gen used skip-shift to pass driveby noise standards.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
LazyLemming
Drivetrain
3
Aug 29, 2015 07:36 PM
Greg88
Drivetrain
4
Aug 24, 2015 07:59 AM
War Engine
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
3
Aug 21, 2015 05:28 AM
Cam's maro
Drag Racing Technique
1
Aug 11, 2015 07:45 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:43 AM.