And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,291
From: Teeter-tottering between Brilliance and Insanity
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
Did we ever get any more information on that SS Colorado concept that was posted on here a while back. I got more exctied about that project than anything else thats been posted on here in a while.
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
Originally Posted by DarthIROC
Did we ever get any more information on that SS Colorado concept that was posted on here a while back. I got more exctied about that project than anything else thats been posted on here in a while.
And SRT Dakota, had better be packing more than a 5.7 Hemi.
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I think, excellent chance it's going to happen.
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
One would have to be blind to not predict that there would be a Hemi-powered Dakota in the very near future...
I knew when it was unveiled with only the 3.7L V6 and the two versions of the 4.7L SOHC red-headed stepchild V8 that the hemi would follow sooner or later.
:blah:
EDIT: Oh yeah, and I too long for the Colorado SS concept (but with a six speed manual option). That was a bad, bad looking truck.
I knew when it was unveiled with only the 3.7L V6 and the two versions of the 4.7L SOHC red-headed stepchild V8 that the hemi would follow sooner or later.
:blah:
EDIT: Oh yeah, and I too long for the Colorado SS concept (but with a six speed manual option). That was a bad, bad looking truck.
Last edited by 96_Camaro_B4C; Mar 1, 2005 at 09:22 AM.
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
A. Didn't see anything in linked article about Hemi in Dakota.
B. Everything I have previously read said that the Hemi wouldn't fit in current Dakota.
C. Hemi is supposedly significantly cheaper to manufacture than OHC 4.7 and therefore a Hemi-powered Dakota would be cheaper to make (and more profitable) than the cammer.
Bottom line is: how can Chrysler be so stupid as to spend all that money re-designing this truck and not allow for installation of Hemi?
B. Everything I have previously read said that the Hemi wouldn't fit in current Dakota.
C. Hemi is supposedly significantly cheaper to manufacture than OHC 4.7 and therefore a Hemi-powered Dakota would be cheaper to make (and more profitable) than the cammer.
Bottom line is: how can Chrysler be so stupid as to spend all that money re-designing this truck and not allow for installation of Hemi?
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
That's true, the cheaper for the consumer, 4.7 is more expensive to manufacture than the pushrod Hemi. The issue right now however, is that Hemi production can barely keep up with demand for Ram, Durango and LX cars.
Re: And now for something completely different.... SRT Dakota?
Mmmmm.....Hemi Dakota. A little fugly but that joker would be quick. GM would be able to have a reason to build the SS Colorado to compete then....I'll take one in black please.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



