Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
PLEASE - take 2 minutes and glance at these...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...

Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
PLEASE - take 2 minutes and glance at these...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...

Mother****er! What the ****! ****ing....****!
Why in the **** is ford not making cars like that here? I know from talking to some aussies that they like their fast cars a bit more than we do up here, but ....****!
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
proud, there was a stang gt in "the oc"
just letting you know they did get it out a little
just letting you know they did get it out a little

So Ford got a background shot in a show on the WB...
GM got a 2-hour movie in which the GTO was the star...
Mmmmm.... Close!
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by Ryan's LT1
All of the cars that ProudPony linked to look AMAZING, and have pretty powerful motors. 290kw is like what, 370hp? That's pretty damn good.
290*1000/746 = 388.7hp - NATURALLY ASPIRATED TOO.
They are using the BOSS 260 and BOSS 290 engines extensively down there.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by grossesexy
Mother****er! What the ****! ****ing....****!
Why in the **** is ford not making cars like that here? I know from talking to some aussies that they like their fast cars a bit more than we do up here, but ....****!
Why in the **** is ford not making cars like that here? I know from talking to some aussies that they like their fast cars a bit more than we do up here, but ....****!
GT-P
Super Pursuit
Typhoon
Falcon XR8
I have been smitten with their cars for the last 3-4 years.
The Aussies have it going on down there!
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
Not only do the exteriors look hot, but did any of you look at the interiors?!?!
GT-P
Super Pursuit
Typhoon
Falcon XR8
I have been smitten with their cars for the last 3-4 years.
The Aussies have it going on down there!
GT-P
Super Pursuit
Typhoon
Falcon XR8
I have been smitten with their cars for the last 3-4 years.
The Aussies have it going on down there!

Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
PLEASE - take 2 minutes and glance at these...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...
MkII GT
MkII GT-P
Pursuit
SuperPursuit
Typhoon
Tornado
Falcon XR6 and XR8
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
I for one, would be buying one of the FPV vehicles - probably the MkII GT-P...

Now I am a Ford hater most of the time, but DAMN. Ford looks to be giving Holden and HSV some serious competition. The real muscle car war seems to be in Australia.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by scott9050
The top 10 selling Focus is nothing? I am sure plenty of Focus owners would disagree. The 500 may be boring at the moment but it is selling better than expected and will do even better when the 3.5 becomes available. Ford is in a changeover period and it will take a few years for everything to be set in place, they aren't going anywhere, and let's not forget the renovation of SVT is going on right now.
But GM needs everything NOW!!
It needs RWD NOW
It needs a Camaro NOW
It needs supercharged V8 Solstices NOW
Everything needs to be RWD, everything needs to have 400hp, and everything has to handle on rails and be priced under 25k...but only GM.
Ford...eh..they can wait. No need to rush the 3.5 Durtec, lets leave the 10 year old 3.0 to do the work in a near 2 ton car and push its AWD.
No need to rush the Fusion and others to a new cars...the 30 year old Taurus should hold up fine.
No need to hurry up on any sort of replacement or anything for the Panther cars...just take your time. I mean...the Mustang should hold everyone over till whenever.
And its not about excitement, its about product, and GM has it in spades. Outside of the underpowerd, and overweight 500, Ford has nothing to bank on. Focus is sad compared to what the rest of teh world gets to drive.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
I don't know why in frozenhell Ford does not make cars like that and sell them in the US?!?!
Ford Aussie doesnt export vehicles like Holden does, or doesnt export them to LHD nations.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by guionM
GM has some really exciting stuff coming as Bob Lutz's product standards, Ed Welburn's design leadership, and Rick Wagoner's willingness to delegate to the car guys kicks in.
Originally Posted by ProudPony
Allow me to make two replies...
1) For the fastest way back on the lots...
I know it would mean a blistered hood at best because of additional deck height, but I would choose the n/a 5.4 with 4v heads and the Lightning cams. For torque - more than anything else. That was the top complaint of rags and gear heads. The Marauder would actually run pretty well once rolling, but nobody could smoke the tires.
Basically, it would be an n/a version of the 2003 Lighning without the blower. Unfortunately, I don't think the Panther platform will accept a manual tranny without major development and testing costs, so it would have to have the auto tranny. 3.55 rear gears in the live axle have to stay for now since the panther platform rests on it anyways.
I think a slightly domed hood - if detailed right - would actually accentuate the lines of the car anyways. Heck, if the buyer is getting chromed 17's, 3" rolled-tip stainless dual exhausts cut through the rear valence, blacked-out grill and trim... what agressive difference is a 1.5" hood blister gonna make?
2) For the BEST way but might take a few more months than option 1...
Grab the BOSS 290 from Australia and bolt it in place, hit the test yard, crash a few, and sell 'em! That engine has great capabilities in N/A cofiguration. I think (but am unsure) that the engine architecture is similar to the modular engines in North America, so it should fit in size-wise and bolt-pattern wise.
That is 390hp in n/a form from a 5.4l engine and it is already available - ready to ride. Nice-looking engine too IMO... Linky .
From the website...
"So not only is there free-revving top-end power but a wall of torque at low speeds as well."
1) For the fastest way back on the lots...
I know it would mean a blistered hood at best because of additional deck height, but I would choose the n/a 5.4 with 4v heads and the Lightning cams. For torque - more than anything else. That was the top complaint of rags and gear heads. The Marauder would actually run pretty well once rolling, but nobody could smoke the tires.
Basically, it would be an n/a version of the 2003 Lighning without the blower. Unfortunately, I don't think the Panther platform will accept a manual tranny without major development and testing costs, so it would have to have the auto tranny. 3.55 rear gears in the live axle have to stay for now since the panther platform rests on it anyways.
I think a slightly domed hood - if detailed right - would actually accentuate the lines of the car anyways. Heck, if the buyer is getting chromed 17's, 3" rolled-tip stainless dual exhausts cut through the rear valence, blacked-out grill and trim... what agressive difference is a 1.5" hood blister gonna make?
2) For the BEST way but might take a few more months than option 1...
Grab the BOSS 290 from Australia and bolt it in place, hit the test yard, crash a few, and sell 'em! That engine has great capabilities in N/A cofiguration. I think (but am unsure) that the engine architecture is similar to the modular engines in North America, so it should fit in size-wise and bolt-pattern wise.
That is 390hp in n/a form from a 5.4l engine and it is already available - ready to ride. Nice-looking engine too IMO... Linky .
From the website...
"So not only is there free-revving top-end power but a wall of torque at low speeds as well."
EXCELLENT ProudPony!Your idea hits on a very simple and inexpensive way to bring this to market, shows a knowledge of some of the problems involved, and gives a great jump off point in which to make it happen IMHO.

Send your idea (including all the points you made) to:
Board of Directors
c/o Philip R. Martens
Group Vice President
Product Creation
Ford Motor Company
P.O. Box 685
Dearborn, MI 48126-0685
U.S.A.
Or drop an e-mail to:
https://www.ford.com/en/support/emailUs.htm.
With the new and likely final Panther coming up shortly, it's a good opportunity to inject some excitement in these cars, this time for real.
Last edited by guionM; Jun 26, 2005 at 10:56 AM.
Re: Not exactly confident with Ford's future.
Originally Posted by 1st and goal
I'd have to say that the "American Revolution" sucks 

I think RP's words here were "I don't know how I'm going to get them all on display".
Originally Posted by Big Als Z
Could be the massive cost of developing LHD?
Ford Aussie doesnt export vehicles like Holden does, or doesnt export them to LHD nations.
Ford Aussie doesnt export vehicles like Holden does, or doesnt export them to LHD nations.
The problem is Ford of Australia manufactures less cars than Holden. Holden manufactures cars for the middle east, New Zealand, and a few otrher countries. Ford of Australia is pretty much limited to Oz and New Zealand, and isn't intrested in expanding capacity since Ford NA & Europe covers what Ford Australia doesn't.
Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
...Both companies have serious problems. One day I think GM is worse off than Ford, and the next I think the opposite. Once again, we will just have to see how it all plays out.
Originally Posted by falchulk
I dont see this. Ford's cars are looking better and better. We will see.
Originally Posted by falchulk
I owned a 98 f150 and the new f150 is worlds beyond that truck!! I dont see how its a step backward in the least. The interior alone is one of the best on the market including cars.
J. Mays is a fashion designer. His outstanding talent is taking shapes that have been around forever, and normally would be as boring as hell, and turning them into jewels of fashion. I used the Mustang and F series as examples. The new F series truck is essentially the super duty design that's been around over 10 years. But because of very minor tweaks, and attention to detail, it is an exceptionally good looking truck without having to resort to oversized grilles, or even side character and creases.
Mays is also IMHO the best car interior designer on the planet at the moment.
The issue I have with Ford isn't so much the styling of J. Mays, it's the chassis direction they are going. The DEW is an exceptional chassis, and with minimal investment (ie: Mustang's D2C) it will be a very cost effective structure. Yet, it's the FWD Volvo based chassis that seems to be getting the nod because of it's AWD capability. There's a good chance that Mustang will be the only RWD car at Ford dealerships in a couple of years.
Originally Posted by IREngineer
Ford has some exciting stuff coming too, they just aren't flashing it in front of the media. Trust me on this one.
Guy - I would be a little worried about D3, but let's give it a year to see how it pans out.
Guy - I would be a little worried about D3, but let's give it a year to see how it pans out.

Originally Posted by Big Als Z
I know I said this about 4 months ago, and I was laughed off teh site becaue I didnt know what I was talking about and made no sence.
Outside of the Mustang and F series, Ford has ZERO to offer.
Fusion and its twins are boring and just another version of a the Temp/Taurus duplication that goes on WAY too much at Ford. Its not that they share a chassis...its that they share near the same body!!
500 and its siblings...same thing.
There is nothing unique and appealling at Ford outside of the Mustang.
But Ford, like Chrysler, uses there new icon cars to cloud the rest of the lazy and crappy line up. You walk in to see Mustang or a 300C, and to the left and right is fleet chams Taurus and Crown Vic, and on Chryslers side, you have the Pacifica and a Sebring?
GM has the opposite. GM has no icon car or cars that will cloud the line up, but there line up is very impressive. They have a lot of divisions, and they have there seperate icons such as Vette, but Vette is almost a seperate brand (and almost was). Caddy is so high above everything else, that the popularity doesnt trickle down, and there is no icon car for Pontiac, Buick or Chevy that will really bring them in.
Outside of the Mustang and F series, Ford has ZERO to offer.
Fusion and its twins are boring and just another version of a the Temp/Taurus duplication that goes on WAY too much at Ford. Its not that they share a chassis...its that they share near the same body!!
500 and its siblings...same thing.
There is nothing unique and appealling at Ford outside of the Mustang.
But Ford, like Chrysler, uses there new icon cars to cloud the rest of the lazy and crappy line up. You walk in to see Mustang or a 300C, and to the left and right is fleet chams Taurus and Crown Vic, and on Chryslers side, you have the Pacifica and a Sebring?
GM has the opposite. GM has no icon car or cars that will cloud the line up, but there line up is very impressive. They have a lot of divisions, and they have there seperate icons such as Vette, but Vette is almost a seperate brand (and almost was). Caddy is so high above everything else, that the popularity doesnt trickle down, and there is no icon car for Pontiac, Buick or Chevy that will really bring them in.
Very intresting.


