New Mercedes Powerplant
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
It's official! The LS7 is now a slow piece of crap! 

Just looking at that motor gives me a headache. Its a V8. They usually just go fast for cheap with little. But I wont complain when another v8 is added to the world, its much better than the alternative.
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
A Mercedez 6.3L engine with 510 HP and 464 lb-ft of torque.
BMW has 5.0L V10 that makes 507 HP and 384 lb-ft of torque.
Z06 makes 505 HP and 470 lb-ft of torque with 7.0 L.
Mercedez beat GM for the torque with .8L less (7011 vs. 6208), but to advertise the "invention" as "the new AMG 6.3-litre V8 engine is the first in the world to combine the high-revving concept with a large displacement."
No, they are not the first in the world. What about all those days of C5R, or even the above quoted example of BMW (relatively large 5.0L displacement), or even 2006 Z06.
I wouldn't have a problem if they said "among the first" or "one of the first"
BMW has 5.0L V10 that makes 507 HP and 384 lb-ft of torque.
Z06 makes 505 HP and 470 lb-ft of torque with 7.0 L.
Mercedez beat GM for the torque with .8L less (7011 vs. 6208), but to advertise the "invention" as "the new AMG 6.3-litre V8 engine is the first in the world to combine the high-revving concept with a large displacement."
No, they are not the first in the world. What about all those days of C5R, or even the above quoted example of BMW (relatively large 5.0L displacement), or even 2006 Z06.
I wouldn't have a problem if they said "among the first" or "one of the first"
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
All those extra moving parts for basically the same performance as the LS7.
It's impressive, but I'm more impressed with the pushrod LS7.
I'd like to see the TQ curve and fuel economy rating, and see how that compares!
Dan
It's impressive, but I'm more impressed with the pushrod LS7.
I'd like to see the TQ curve and fuel economy rating, and see how that compares!
Dan
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
Crappy article with bad wording or not, I still think the motor is a pretty nice piece.
I would like to see more specs on it though, like weight for one, amongst other things.
I would like to see more specs on it though, like weight for one, amongst other things.
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
Originally Posted by RussStang
Crappy article with bad wording or not, I still think the motor is a pretty nice piece.

But seriously, I think we all are curious about the weight.
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
Originally Posted by stereomandan
All those extra moving parts for basically the same performance as the LS7.
It's impressive, but I'm more impressed with the pushrod LS7.
I'd like to see the TQ curve and fuel economy rating, and see how that compares!
Dan
It's impressive, but I'm more impressed with the pushrod LS7.
I'd like to see the TQ curve and fuel economy rating, and see how that compares!
Dan
Last edited by SCNGENNFTHGEN; Jul 15, 2005 at 06:47 PM.
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
Originally Posted by SCNGENNFTHGEN
AW has it at 438 lbs.
That's actually good. I thought it was going to be in the 500's easily.
Impressive engine.
Re: New Mercedes Powerplant
LS7 has the advantage by 0.7L.
The 6.0 LS2 should be able to perform at these levels with a bigger cam, maybe intake/heads I bet it could. That's all they've done here, I wonder how street friendly it is???
The 6.0 LS2 should be able to perform at these levels with a bigger cam, maybe intake/heads I bet it could. That's all they've done here, I wonder how street friendly it is???
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
Oct 31, 2016 11:09 AM
[Exterior] BMW & Mercedes can look like 5th gen Camaro
Husbarn
2010 - 2015 Camaro Interior, Exterior, Paint & Body, Electronics/Car Audio
3
Mar 30, 2015 11:45 AM
95GRNZ
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
9
Nov 6, 2003 12:52 PM
bigsteve7
Site Help and Suggestions
0
Mar 28, 2003 09:59 PM



