Mustang Concept, first pictures
#16
I'm still wondering about why its on the beach. Spy shots are usually disguised cars on the ROADS sicne that's where they all exist. They don't pose at the beach with the owner! It looks awesome I think it still is suspicious. You can see how it matches all the proportions of the Lincoln LS and looks like all the concept drawings in the past few months. It seems like the real deal at least.
#18
Actually i am willing to bet that that shot came from Ford. It happens often that an automaker will leak a shot early to see how the public reacts. Notice it isn't watermarked by any of the know spy shot photographers such as Brenda Priddy company.
#20
the butt is HUGE, the nose is too angled (almost a cross between a 60's mustang and a 70s-80s BMW) and the side? It looks big and bulbous, not sleek and fast. a 280hp v8 and a 400hp v8. What about a 350hp v8 and then whatever GM does next? Comon. The Nissan altima is faster then the new GT mustangs now, and I hear a new honda accord with 280HP is on the way...
Also I'd like to note that the "retros" in recent history:
Prowler
PT Cruiser
New Beetle
Ford Thunderbird
SSR truck
I notice the prowler, PT cruiser, and beetle sold well. Who designed some of those cars, and the SSR? How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
Ford's retro department isnt quite on target...
A 2007 40th anniv' Camaro with the new Ls2, whatever it will be, would kick the snot out of it... Comon. The ls1's kick the snot out of the GT's now and the great ol 5.0's -- and I'm assuming the Ls2 will be nothing short of even more bad ***, considering they want to use it to slaughter the viper.
Also I'd like to note that the "retros" in recent history:
Prowler
PT Cruiser
New Beetle
Ford Thunderbird
SSR truck
I notice the prowler, PT cruiser, and beetle sold well. Who designed some of those cars, and the SSR? How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
Ford's retro department isnt quite on target...
A 2007 40th anniv' Camaro with the new Ls2, whatever it will be, would kick the snot out of it... Comon. The ls1's kick the snot out of the GT's now and the great ol 5.0's -- and I'm assuming the Ls2 will be nothing short of even more bad ***, considering they want to use it to slaughter the viper.
#21
Originally posted by formula79
Actually i am willing to bet that that shot came from Ford. It happens often that an automaker will leak a shot early to see how the public reacts. Notice it isn't watermarked by any of the know spy shot photographers such as Brenda Priddy company.
Actually i am willing to bet that that shot came from Ford. It happens often that an automaker will leak a shot early to see how the public reacts. Notice it isn't watermarked by any of the know spy shot photographers such as Brenda Priddy company.
As for the Mustang itself - I think it looks pretty cool. It isn't THAT retro, it's actually pretty modern, with many cues to the past.
#22
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
. The Nissan altima is faster then the new GT mustangs now
. The Nissan altima is faster then the new GT mustangs now
14.7 quarter mile versus 14.1. Yes, faster by a whole - 0.6 seconds.
#23
I wasnt totally serious about the altima being faster then the mustang... but I've driven a new altima, and they are cartainly fun cars.
But I WAS serious in the idea that a 4 door sedan (rather nice size too) with a 6 cylinder engine keeps up to a "sports car v8"
And a N/A 6cyl at that.
But I WAS serious in the idea that a 4 door sedan (rather nice size too) with a 6 cylinder engine keeps up to a "sports car v8"
And a N/A 6cyl at that.
Last edited by Geoff Chadwick; 12-03-2002 at 11:54 AM.
#24
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
A 2007 40th anniv' Camaro with the new Ls2, whatever it will be, would kick the snot out of it... Comon. The ls1's kick the snot out of the GT's now and the great ol 5.0's -- and I'm assuming the Ls2 will be nothing short of even more bad ***, considering they want to use it to slaughter the viper.
#26
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
Also I'd like to note that the "retros" in recent history:
Prowler
PT Cruiser
New Beetle
Ford Thunderbird
SSR truck
I notice the prowler, PT cruiser, and beetle sold well. Who designed some of those cars, and the SSR? How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
Ford's retro department isnt quite on target...
Also I'd like to note that the "retros" in recent history:
Prowler
PT Cruiser
New Beetle
Ford Thunderbird
SSR truck
I notice the prowler, PT cruiser, and beetle sold well. Who designed some of those cars, and the SSR? How well did the "new" thunderbird do? Last I knew, it was a flop.
Ford's retro department isnt quite on target...
This Mustang doesn't look like a huge departure from the direction they started moving in '99. It's a safe bet that the Mustang will continue to sell well regardless, and especially with no direct competitor. I think it will be a sharper car in coupe/fastback trim (and likely with faux hood scoops). I really don't know how you can slam Ford about it. Not that I'm saying this is completely the case, but an unoriginal, retro pony car is better than no pony car at all...
Originally posted by Geoff Chadwick
I wasn't totally serious about the altima being faster then the mustang... but I've driven a new altima, and they are cartainly fun cars.
But I WAS serious in the idea that a 4 door sedan (rather nice size too) with a 6 cylinder engine keeps up to a "sports car v8"
And a N/A 6cyl at that.
I wasn't totally serious about the altima being faster then the mustang... but I've driven a new altima, and they are cartainly fun cars.
But I WAS serious in the idea that a 4 door sedan (rather nice size too) with a 6 cylinder engine keeps up to a "sports car v8"
And a N/A 6cyl at that.
#27
Originally posted by jrp4uc
I don't know about Altimas, but I know of a certain 4 cyl sedan that can run with the Mustangs and some of the other V8s.
I don't know about Altimas, but I know of a certain 4 cyl sedan that can run with the Mustangs and some of the other V8s.
#29
Or the DSM crowd.
Yes I know, there is no knowledge of a 5th gen camaro. Sadly though, whatever GM continues to work on, something worth while will come of it. I'm upset because they're still sticking that dumb engine in there. It's a nice motor, but a lower displacement engine SHOULD get better gas milage for testing then a larger displacement. I could understand if it werent normally aspirated... But the 4.6L mustang gets 24/17 rated vs 27/16 rated in the lt1. It should be better then that I would think. It should atleast be better then the lt1! But the motor gets less power and torque, as well as similar if not worse gas milage. For what? They should have atleast kept up with the 5.0 engine.
When they came out with the 5.0 engine, it was a slap in the face to GM. Even into the mid 90's against the Lt1's - the tried and true 5.0 engine held it's weight decently, and with the plethera of aftermarket parts it was more then worthwhile. Then they change so a SOHC 4.6 and a DOHC 4.6... And even now, I'm not impressed. But the cars are apparently more balanced then our cars. The ride is more comfortable (albeit I dont like the seats and the controls arent all within real easy reach) and it's more of a car to enjoy the ride vs go fast. But that's how most people want it these days.
Granted, the thunderbird is selling decently, and the beetles/pt cruisers (speaking of which - Isnt the PT cruiser almost identical in chassis to the 4 door neon??) are more of a fad - as will the SSR and whatever follows, but the sales of the PT cruisers and Beetles, fad or not, are really high. If Ford made more thunderbirds, would they all sell? Good question. But from almost everyone I know, some dont like the PT cruiser, some dont like the beetle, but most agree the prowler is cool, and the pt cruiser and beetle are atleast "nifty" but the thunderbird just looks funny. Like they tried to make it more retro then they should have. I'll agree it was something interesting, sure, but it just dosent have some of the appeal that the pt cruiser or beetle had. I would have thought if ford would go retro, the first to go would be the mustang...
Speaking of which, I still think it looks bulbous and really too big. Now that I think of it, the design is too simple and straight. The hood and trunk line right up and it looks strange. Let me see a fastback though, maybe my mood will change.
Yes I know, there is no knowledge of a 5th gen camaro. Sadly though, whatever GM continues to work on, something worth while will come of it. I'm upset because they're still sticking that dumb engine in there. It's a nice motor, but a lower displacement engine SHOULD get better gas milage for testing then a larger displacement. I could understand if it werent normally aspirated... But the 4.6L mustang gets 24/17 rated vs 27/16 rated in the lt1. It should be better then that I would think. It should atleast be better then the lt1! But the motor gets less power and torque, as well as similar if not worse gas milage. For what? They should have atleast kept up with the 5.0 engine.
When they came out with the 5.0 engine, it was a slap in the face to GM. Even into the mid 90's against the Lt1's - the tried and true 5.0 engine held it's weight decently, and with the plethera of aftermarket parts it was more then worthwhile. Then they change so a SOHC 4.6 and a DOHC 4.6... And even now, I'm not impressed. But the cars are apparently more balanced then our cars. The ride is more comfortable (albeit I dont like the seats and the controls arent all within real easy reach) and it's more of a car to enjoy the ride vs go fast. But that's how most people want it these days.
Granted, the thunderbird is selling decently, and the beetles/pt cruisers (speaking of which - Isnt the PT cruiser almost identical in chassis to the 4 door neon??) are more of a fad - as will the SSR and whatever follows, but the sales of the PT cruisers and Beetles, fad or not, are really high. If Ford made more thunderbirds, would they all sell? Good question. But from almost everyone I know, some dont like the PT cruiser, some dont like the beetle, but most agree the prowler is cool, and the pt cruiser and beetle are atleast "nifty" but the thunderbird just looks funny. Like they tried to make it more retro then they should have. I'll agree it was something interesting, sure, but it just dosent have some of the appeal that the pt cruiser or beetle had. I would have thought if ford would go retro, the first to go would be the mustang...
Speaking of which, I still think it looks bulbous and really too big. Now that I think of it, the design is too simple and straight. The hood and trunk line right up and it looks strange. Let me see a fastback though, maybe my mood will change.
#30
No one knows what is coming in 5 years, how can you comment on the LS2 or its potential when you know nothing about it?
IF a 5th gen came out it would be a good bet this engine would be used in that car. Redplanet tells us a 5th gen would have a V8 and be RWD.
Now...given the Mustang specs in the article it is not a great leap to argue that a 5th gen IF it existed could best a 4.6 V8 powered mustang.