Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Move over Prius, its America's turn!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #16  
97QuasarBlue3.8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,018
Range is a valuable feature. However, I think it's misguided when they put a big fuel tank in a little car just to be able to say it can do 700+ miles or "1000 miles" on a tank of gas to make it sound like its super-efficient. Especially if the goal is fuel efficiency in a small car where fuel = more weight and typically smaller motors.

I believe the recommendation is to stop every 2 hours of continuous driving. It's good to fend off clot formation, for stretching, for renewing alertness, to check the vehicle, and it's another chance to fuel up. I've done the LA-SF drive many times, as well as Seattle - SF, and Seattle - LA. Not once have I ever been in jeopardy of running out of fuel in a 250 mile range car (Jeep Wrangler) or a 400+ mile range car (GTI). I still stop just as often, either at a rest stop or gas station.

The only benefit (personally) for long range is when I go on one of those "remote" camping trips where the nearest gas station is like 75 miles away, so there and back eats up a good 1/3 tank plus any driving/offroading, etc. I sure as hell wouldn't be taking a Ford Fusion though...
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 02:42 PM
  #17  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
I wonder what GM's V6 Diesel would have done in mpg in either Zeta or Sigma...
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 03:13 PM
  #18  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
You know for some little old ladies that hardly ever drive, that sort of range might start presenting issues with the age of the fuel.
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 05:09 PM
  #19  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Threxx
You know for some little old ladies that hardly ever drive, that sort of range might start presenting issues with the age of the fuel.
My grandmother before she died in 2002 had a 1995 Olds. In that 7 years she put 18,000 miles on the car. She dove slow and would have filled the tank less than most people change their oil in a year if she was driving a Fusion Hybrid.
Old Apr 22, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #20  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
23mph sounds very slow, but it's an average, and it isn't too bad if you deal with stop and go traffic. Keep in mind their test route probably won't include too much (if any) hwy driving, and will most likely tackle normal roads with stop and go traffic which is where the hybrid system really shines.

I usually average no more than 28-30mph on a full tank and that's with me driving 10-15mph over the speed limit half the time. That's also with 2/5th's hwy driving.

So the 23mph average isn't as bad as it sounds.

Last edited by Gold_Rush; Apr 22, 2009 at 06:37 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Feffman
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
4
Oct 9, 2015 05:42 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Mar 11, 2015 06:10 PM
192cobra
Midwest
0
Jan 26, 2015 12:12 PM
192cobra
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
0
Jan 26, 2015 12:10 PM
formula79
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
26
Aug 5, 2002 12:21 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.