More Mustang.
You know, in the picture with the old car and the new one, they seem to have a pretty similar profile except that the 05's hood doesn't dip as much as the old car. The 05' seems to have a look of more "mass" than the old one even with disregaurding the camo. I still say the new car will be a few hundred pounds more than the current model.
Originally posted by Schismblade
How much is it supposed to weigh?
Also, do us LS1 guys have anything to worry about from the stock 05' GTs?
How much is it supposed to weigh?
Also, do us LS1 guys have anything to worry about from the stock 05' GTs?
Originally posted by Schismblade
How much is it supposed to weigh?
Also, do us LS1 guys have anything to worry about from the stock 05' GTs?
How much is it supposed to weigh?
Also, do us LS1 guys have anything to worry about from the stock 05' GTs?
Originally posted by guionM
Put it this way, the stock '05 Mustang GT targeted the LS1 F-bodies in performance.
Put it this way, the stock '05 Mustang GT targeted the LS1 F-bodies in performance.
However, if it weighs less.....
Originally posted by Schismblade
I thought the Mach 1s were targeting us? So far the popular opinion seems to be 275 rwhp for the GTs. 30 or so shy of an LS1.
However, if it weighs less.....
I thought the Mach 1s were targeting us? So far the popular opinion seems to be 275 rwhp for the GTs. 30 or so shy of an LS1.
However, if it weighs less.....
That's right. The new 3V 4.6 puts out around 300 at the crank equal to the current 4V 4.6 in the current Mach1, which runs low 13's at 106-108 stock.
The new 3V head is more compact than the old 2V and flows close to the Mach1 4V head. Amazing.
So there's your '05 base Stang GT.
Starting at $24K and change.
The new 3V head is more compact than the old 2V and flows close to the Mach1 4V head. Amazing.
So there's your '05 base Stang GT.
Starting at $24K and change.
Originally posted by hp_nut
That's right. The new 3V 4.6 puts out around 300 at the crank equal to the current 4V 4.6 in the current Mach1, which runs low 13's at 106-108 stock.
That's right. The new 3V 4.6 puts out around 300 at the crank equal to the current 4V 4.6 in the current Mach1, which runs low 13's at 106-108 stock.
Originally posted by Doug Harden
Scott brought up an interesting point at our BG breakfast meeting....how many of these will sell in Europe due to the higher speeds on the Autobahn?
The front of these have to be horrible in the wind tunnel.
Scott brought up an interesting point at our BG breakfast meeting....how many of these will sell in Europe due to the higher speeds on the Autobahn?
The front of these have to be horrible in the wind tunnel.
Originally posted by PacerX
Since when does 300 crank hp run with an LS1?
Since when does 300 crank hp run with an LS1?
300 crank GT < 325-350ish crank LS1.
It sounds to me like the new GTs will be LT1 speed.
Wow, thats a nice Mach1...maybe if I have the $$ I will trade in my v6 for that...
I like the interior...it kinda looks retro!...if i bought that car I would get it in electric blue with black stripes!
I like the interior...it kinda looks retro!...if i bought that car I would get it in electric blue with black stripes!
Originally posted by PacerX
Since when does 300 crank hp run with an LS1?
Since when does 300 crank hp run with an LS1?
The average mph is about 2 less than LS1 which translates to about 20-25 hp difference.
So the current "officially rated 300hp" Mach1 is explainable running low 13s @ 106.
I guess the question is will the 300hp 3V in the '05 be underrated or will it be really 300 meaning it should dyno around 255 at the wheels and run significantly slower than an LS1.
But... word is LS1 performance is the target for the GT and coupled with the reports of test mules dynoing 275 at the wheels suggests that the '05 GT will run about where the current Mach1 is.


