Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Leaked email....maybe bad news for Mustang GT?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:20 AM
  #1  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Leaked email....maybe bad news for Mustang GT?

http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?showtopic=1376
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:31 AM
  #2  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
Grain of salt for now.
I don't think Ford would risk anything "covert" on such an important product.
Besides, they are already rolling Pre-prod units to aftermaket shops...
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:36 AM
  #3  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
That's a shame for the new GT. Surely Ford is in touch with their enthusiasts (that's all we ever hear around here, why can't GM listen to their supporters like Ford does), so the amount of effort to modify torque/ECM seems questionable. Even if Ford's strategy was for customers to buy add-on performance parts from them, unless the dealer is installing them that problem will persist.

But 300hp in 3800lb car...the author was correct that a new Camaro SS will have it for breakfast. Not to mention a lot of Camaros that have been on the streets for about a decade.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 09:57 AM
  #4  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Ouch! If that is true then the GT will not be any faster than the current one I would bet. The weight issue was brought up before and the general opinion was that it would weigh more but 3800 lbs, wow, that is really over weight. The weight issue will also hurt all of the other cars on the platform seing as the GT was always the lightest.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:17 AM
  #5  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
I've hard the 05 GT to be 320hp but the weight was high, in the 3600 range. Thats a far cry for this info and who knows how legit any of this is. But good for debate.

As for the ECM thats the first I've heard of it. It would be interesting if Ford made modding something that has to be ok'd by the dealer. Meaning you'd have to have your PCM flashed in order to even drive the car if modded seems a bit too over protective. I know they have been real tight on the 03-04 Cobra and modding. It could get a lot worse.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:43 AM
  #6  
Sixer-Bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,215
From: Coppell, Texas
Not sure if I believe any of this. The new Stang doesn't look to be a feather-weight by any means, but 3800 is pretty heafty. And I though the GTO was a bit on the heavy side...

If the whole thing about the ECM is true, its probably in response to any potential warranty claim issues.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:50 AM
  #7  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
If this is all true....

The ECM issue is probably not a biggie. It won't take the aftermarket too long to crack the code.

But a GT at 3800 lbs......holy moley!

I remember that heads rolled at Ford after the MN12 came in too heavy....wonder what might happen here?
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
Magnum Force's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 578
From: N. Providence, RI
I called it back in Aug.!

My original estimate for weight was 3750 lbs!!
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:08 AM
  #9  
95GRNZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,779
From: Denton, TX
Thumbs down

Just like posted in that original thread: sounds like a disgruntled employee to me.

Maybe some of the things he is telling have some truth behind them, maybe not, but I'd definetely take all of them with a grain of salt.

Who knows, he might be exaggerating just to stir the pot for nothing.

Also, why does it say at the bottom part that

I'm bound by a confidentiality agreement.
when he is spewing out all that info already earlier??? Hypothetical, or not... Or is that a comment from somebody else...? Confused:

Anyway... We'll know for sure shortly, I guess...

TS
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:12 AM
  #10  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
If the ECM thing is true, it's probably a function of the new OBD III emission regs that's to be released soon.

If it is part of OBD III, then every manufacturer will have to install this feature on every car.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #11  
stars1010's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,121
From: Houston
I don’t know what to think. I hope for the Camaro’s sake that the new mustang doesn’t have its arms tied behind its back. GM is only going to do enough to make sure they beat the Stang. In my opinion if the Stang isn’t doing all that hot it wont be good for the Camaro.

I don’t think we should read too much into this. That guy was obviously bitter towards Ford for being fired by upper management. Its not like he’s going to get fired and say nice things. So yeah, what ProudPony said, “take this with a grain of salt”. I doubt Ford would put so much into a new Mustang only to make it a flop to the performance world. Lets just wait and see.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #12  
Schismblade's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 563
From: Z
Looks like I won't have to be worried about new GTs with that heavy of a weight.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #13  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Originally posted by stars1010
I hope for the Camaro’s sake that the new mustang doesn’t have its arms tied behind its back. GM is only going to do enough to make sure they beat the Stang. In my opinion if the Stang isn’t doing all that hot it wont be good for the Camaro.

What makes you think that GM will do the bare minimum to beat the Mustang? This certainly was not true for the 4th gen. I would think that most of what the Camaro will have mechanically has already been determined and will especially by the time the Mustang comes out so I think that is a non-factor. I never bought into the theory that the fate of the Camaro depends on the Mustang or vice-versa.

Also, why would this guy make this stuff up? What does he have to gain? It will not hurt Ford if he is giving false info because it will be proven wrong once the car is ready to be sold to the public. Also, it doesn't sound like something someone would just pull out of thier ***, speaking mostly about the ECM stuff. Do you think at Detroit they will release all the specs including weight?
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
RiceEating5.0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,313
If all is true, than that's not good.

Guess we'll find out sooner or later.
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 03:11 PM
  #15  
Doug Harden's Avatar
Prominent Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,282
GM, OBII has had Torque Management built into thier programming for a few years now.....LS1 edit guys can get rid of it, for the most part.

......New torque based strategy that would not allow mods that increased torque. If you did it would put the car in FAILSAFE drive condition.

That means going to the dealer and having them reset the PCM.

A PCM with no chip port like on the new 04 F150.

That also means the tuners and chip suppliers are going to have to work to decode a all new calibration. That is going to take time to decode and offer a reflash to change the torque tables in the strategy for mods.
But what does no chip port mean?!? I guess they no longer use a replaceable chip? GM hasn't used chips since 1993.....

People will figure it out soon enough.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.