Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

The latest on large RWD sedans (and CAFE)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2009, 02:02 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
teal98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 3,132
Originally Posted by AdioSS
My 96 impala has a LOT more front and rear overhang than my wife's 04 impala...

I have noticed that FWD cars generally have the rear wheels further back in the chassis than RWD cars.
Older American RWD cars (a category your Impala falls into) had lots of front and rear overhang. Minimal front overhang on RWD started in Europe and spread.

The other difference between FWD and RWD is distance from front axle to passenger compartment. It's greater with RWD.
teal98 is offline  
Old 01-13-2009, 06:21 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
flowmotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by AdioSS
My 96 impala has a LOT more front and rear overhang than my wife's 04 impala...

I have noticed that FWD cars generally have the rear wheels further back in the chassis than RWD cars.
Those B-bodies were probably the most extreme case of overhang.

I don't think it's front versus rear wheel drive, just that modern car design pushes the wheels out to the corners to maximize passenger space over the hood/trunk. Look at the 300C for example.
flowmotion is offline  
Old 01-13-2009, 07:45 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
colin911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: London, ON
Posts: 285
guionM, do you know when are we going to see Chrysler's redesigned LX cars???
colin911 is offline  
Old 01-13-2009, 10:42 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Wild Willy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: upstate New York
Posts: 439
Couldn't some of the drivetrain and chassis engineering already developed for the new Camaro be used in another RWD platform? Your company's own research seems to indicate that such a car would not be a big seller- why not have both versions available, FWD and RWD- sort of an economy line or a luxury/performance line? There is a small but dependable segment of the buying public that want such a vehicle, and will buy elsewhere if need be- whether at the Ford/Mercury store, re-furbed, or an SUV- which sort of knocks down the CAFE numbers if the truck/utility vehicle mileage numbers end up being included-

What about fleet markets? Taxi, rental, police and municipal? GM gave these markets away when they had a vehicle that was stellar- on paid-for tooling, already designed and running. I know Arlington plant went to truck production, but I would have to say that this may have been short-sighted on management's part- nice to make money on one segment of the market, by cannibalizing another part-

I don't know- I realize that the market is shrinking, and the government is stacking the playing field against big vehicles, but there is a consistent section there that GM continues to give to Ford, and now Chrysler- the POMS market- not high volume, but steady, and much like other low-volume lines that are flagships, such as corvette or camaro, a fleet vehicle is a rolling billboard that shows there are still people who believe in your product.
Wild Willy is offline  
Old 01-13-2009, 03:56 PM
  #35  
West South Central Moderator
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kilgore TX 75662
Posts: 3,372
Originally Posted by Wild *****
Couldn't some of the drivetrain and chassis engineering already developed for the new Camaro be used in another RWD platform? Your company's own research seems to indicate that such a car would not be a big seller- why not have both versions available, FWD and RWD- sort of an economy line or a luxury/performance line? There is a small but dependable segment of the buying public that want such a vehicle, and will buy elsewhere if need be- whether at the Ford/Mercury store, re-furbed, or an SUV- which sort of knocks down the CAFE numbers if the truck/utility vehicle mileage numbers end up being included-

What about fleet markets? Taxi, rental, police and municipal? GM gave these markets away when they had a vehicle that was stellar- on paid-for tooling, already designed and running. I know Arlington plant went to truck production, but I would have to say that this may have been short-sighted on management's part- nice to make money on one segment of the market, by cannibalizing another part-

I don't know- I realize that the market is shrinking, and the government is stacking the playing field against big vehicles, but there is a consistent section there that GM continues to give to Ford, and now Chrysler- the POMS market- not high volume, but steady, and much like other low-volume lines that are flagships, such as corvette or camaro, a fleet vehicle is a rolling billboard that shows there are still people who believe in your product.
I agree with most of your post. As much as I like the B-bodies, the Arlington plant probably made a lot larger profit from the Tahoes, Denalis and Escalades it has built there over the past 12 years than it would have if it continued to make full-size cars.
AdioSS is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
09-15-2015 11:53 AM
cmsmith
2016+ Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and General Discussion
7
09-14-2015 09:25 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
09-11-2015 09:44 AM
whitehooptie
LT1 Based Engine Tech
2
08-17-2015 08:35 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
08-03-2015 10:26 PM



Quick Reply: The latest on large RWD sedans (and CAFE)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.