Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Interesting LSx factoid...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #1  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Interesting LSx factoid...

The LS2 weighs... get this... 255lbs. less than the LT5.

Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #2  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

yea, without those huge double cam heads, lol. please tell me secrets. i want to know whats really going on. all the people in the know keep themselves and have formed a support group specifically to not tell me stuff. i want in.
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Sorry, young Skywalker, you do not have a secret decoder ring.

Just pulling yer leg...

No news right now.
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #4  
Meccadeth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,472
From: South Bend, Indiana
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

?! Thats insane! How did they do that??
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 05:20 PM
  #5  
Big Als Z's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,306
From: Jersey Shore
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

wowowowowowowowowowowow!!

Tell me this is not new news to anyone? Its a lot of weight, but when it comes to weight and packaging, OHV>OHC.
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #6  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

The weight in relation to a LT-1 or an LS-1 would be alot more useful to us I think. Granted, that is quite a difference, but it is kind of a no brainer. DOHC engines weigh alot due to all the associated hardware necessitated by their configuration. But God, LT-5
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 06:56 PM
  #7  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by eagleknight97
The weight in relation to a LT-1 or an LS-1 would be alot more useful to us I think. Granted, that is quite a difference, but it is kind of a no brainer. DOHC engines weigh alot due to all the associated hardware necessitated by their configuration. But God, LT-5
The LS2 is 15lbs. lighter than the LS1

I'd like to know what a DOHC V6 weighs, how about a Northstar
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #8  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by eagleknight97
The weight in relation to a LT-1 or an LS-1 would be alot more useful to us I think. Granted, that is quite a difference, but it is kind of a no brainer. DOHC engines weigh alot due to all the associated hardware necessitated by their configuration. But God, LT-5
The LT5 weighs approximately 140 lbs. more than the LT1 and 240 lbs. more than the LS1/LS6... it's a ton bigger (volume-wise) than either.

Oh, one more thingy... The fastest small block powered, naturally aspirated Corvette on the planet is an LT5 car.

Last edited by PacerX; Oct 26, 2004 at 07:01 PM.
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 07:15 PM
  #9  
eagleknight97's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,495
From: Westmont, IL
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by PacerX
Oh, one more thingy... The fastest small block powered, naturally aspirated Corvette on the planet is an LT5 car.
The exact reason for the
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

wasn't this in that tech article about he LS2?? I remember reading that the gm powertrain team used computer modeling to remove "excess" metal from the LS1 castings for the LS2.

on the one hand this could signal that the engine is more robust. but on the other it could also spell fragile. :blah:

Old Oct 26, 2004 | 07:37 PM
  #11  
MissedShift's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 858
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by morb|d
wasn't this in that tech article about he LS2?? I remember reading that the gm powertrain team used computer modeling to remove "excess" metal from the LS1 castings for the LS2.

on the one hand this could signal that the engine is more robust. but on the other it could also spell fragile. :blah:

They're probably talking about casting flash, and other unnnecassary bits.
Old Oct 26, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #12  
poSSum's Avatar
Disciple
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,479
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

I'd be more interested in knowing how much lighter the LS2 is than the (over)hyped hemi.
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #13  
PacerX's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,979
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by poSSum
I'd be more interested in knowing how much lighter the LS2 is than the (over)hyped hemi.
Hmmm... LS2 vs. "LS1 junior", i.e. the "Hemi" (which ain't).

Are there fully aluminum Hemi's out yet?
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #14  
Gold_Rush's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,870
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by Big Als Z
wowowowowowowowowowowow!!

Tell me this is not new news to anyone? Its a lot of weight, but when it comes to weight and packaging, OHV>OHC.
Hehe, i love it when import guys label v8's as big, heavy, and guzzlers of gas. Then i break out the fact that that mammothly humongous (can never convince them that 346ci isn't THAT big) v8 weighs less than their NSX's high-tech all-aluminum 3.2 v6 while having an average fuel economy similar to that of the lighter, smaller, and less powerful 2.0L s2000. That usually shuts them up.

PacerX, not that i've seen yet. I believe both the 5.7 and upcoming 6.1 Hemi's are still using Iron-blocks.
Old Oct 27, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #15  
DrewSG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 627
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Re: Interesting LSx factoid...

Originally Posted by Gold_Rush
Hehe, i love it when import guys label v8's as big, heavy, and guzzlers of gas. Then i break out the fact that that mammothly humongous (can never convince them that 346ci isn't THAT big) v8 weighs less than their NSX's high-tech all-aluminum 3.2 v6 while having an average fuel economy similar to that of the lighter, smaller, and less powerful 2.0L s2000. That usually shuts them up.

PacerX, not that i've seen yet. I believe both the 5.7 and upcoming 6.1 Hemi's are still using Iron-blocks.
Import guys never believe I average 23+ MPG in my Camaro, they the best I average is around 15. Ignorance is bliss I guess



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.