Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

If Camaro is the only Zeta left........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 18, 2008 | 11:53 PM
  #31  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
How about a Pontiac built alongside Camaro with some different engine options... V6 w/forced induction? Doesn't have to be a "Firebird," just a sporty Pontiac coupe "big brother" to the Solstice. Extend the Solstice's design language into something slightly edgier with more creases.

Something akin to this:

Last edited by jrp4uc; Jan 18, 2008 at 11:58 PM.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 01:05 AM
  #32  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Like I said on C&G , If I were a gambling man .....I'd be betting the farm the Camaro is the only Zeta , save for the imported G8 the US will see . And if any other Zeta model survived the cut , it would be the DTS . They would almost need the DTS if they want to play equals with BMW and Merc . Then Alpha full speed ahead .

Pontiac has just got to have the biggest case of blue ***** ever with all these on again off again on again off again platform changes .

Just an opinion
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 02:49 AM
  #33  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
I think people are mixing up what is being said here. I think Josh is saying that the Y-body will become smaller/lighter and possibly more versitile and that is what Solstice will move to. Not that the Solstice will move to the current Y-body.
Thank you!!
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 02:51 AM
  #34  
JB'z 94's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 664
From: Hanford, CA, USA
I agree with 90 Z28SS, I don't see how relevant Cadillac can be HERE without the DTS/STS replacement, and the only platform that makes sense right now is Zeta. But please give use smaller Cadillacs!
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 02:52 AM
  #35  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Originally Posted by 90 Z28SS

Pontiac has just got to have the biggest case of blue ***** ever with all these on again off again on again off again platform changes .

Just an opinion
Since you like to talk about *****....you're dead nuts wrong. Pontiac is fine!

I hate to hear people claim one brand after the other is on the chopping block only to hear a few months later that GM "finally knows what they are doing."

Mark my words right here and now:

Pontiac will be the future PERFORMANCE aspect of E-Flex in the next 10 years.

End.Of.Story.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 02:55 AM
  #36  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally Posted by Josh452
Since you like to talk about *****....you're dead nuts wrong. Pontiac is fine!

I hate to hear people claim one brand after the other is on the chopping block only to hear a few months later that GM "finally knows what they are doing."

Mark my words right here and now:

Pontiac will be the future PERFORMANCE aspect of E-Flex in the next 10 years.

End.Of.Story.
I didnt refer to Pontiac as doom and gloom or on the chopping block . They possibly get GTO , then no GTO . They possibly get the ute , then likely no ute , they possibly get the G8 ST ...then no ST =blue ***** . Dont read more into what I said than the simple humerous statement it was
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 07:06 AM
  #37  
Capn Pete's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,308
From: Oshawa - Home of the 5th-gen
Wow. Apparently I'm WAY behind on the times!!! Why has GM decided to scrap all plans for other Zeta chassis cars?!

At one time, there was "hypothetically" supposed to be:
- Camaro
- Impala
- G8
- Buick ???
- Cadillac ???

..... correct? ... and now it's cut down to only Camaro!? That doesn't sound good.

So then, what are the future plans for the Impala? Or the G8? (it IS a Zeta chassis, isn't it??) Like someone else mentioned, since they're already converting Oshawa over to build the Camaro, why not run other cars of the same chassis down the line with it? Unless GM really wants to excercise the "FLEX" option of the Flex-line? (have Camaros, CUV's and full-size trucks rolling off the same assembly line?! )
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 10:07 AM
  #38  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
I think people are mixing up what is being said here. I think Josh is saying that the Y-body will become smaller/lighter and possibly more versitile and that is what Solstice will move to. Not that the Solstice will move to the current Y-body.
Can you offer a $20,000-$25,000 car on the same basic platform as a car costing twice as much (or 3 times at some trim levels)? Still doesn't seem to make sense.

You thought Vette guys had a s--- fit when XLR hopped on the Y-body train.....
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 11:35 AM
  #39  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Can you offer a $20,000-$25,000 car on the same basic platform as a car costing twice as much (or 3 times at some trim levels)? Still doesn't seem to make sense.

You thought Vette guys had a s--- fit when XLR hopped on the Y-body train.....
Who is to say the Solstice would stay at the $20k mark? Who is to say the Solstice will be comparable in power?

A Turbo DI 4 cylinder Solstice around 300 hp would be the ultimate 'Billy Bob' that the FRC was supposed to be. And offering it in a different showroom, in a different marketing channel for $10k less than the Vette and not offering the performance would certainly differentiate it.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #40  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
A Turbo DI 4 cylinder Solstice around 300 hp would be the ultimate 'Billy Bob' that the FRC was supposed to be. And offering it in a different showroom, in a different marketing channel for $10k less than the Vette and not offering the performance would certainly differentiate it.
Mmk, so why do I want to pay just $10k less than the Corvette for non-Corvette performance? Seems like a losing proposition to me.

I think the current Solstice/Sky's appeal is that it's a fun little car at a great price. It would seem to be much more expensive than it actually is, and its only direct competition is the Miata. A $35k-$40k Solstice puts it up against entry-lux roadsters like the BMW Z4, the Mercedes SLK....these aren't great areas for a Pontiac to play in.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #41  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Anyone know what the contractual obligations would be regarding Zeta, Oshawa and the CAW?
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #42  
Z284ever's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by jg95z28
I expect there's still a chance we'll see crossovers for Buick and Cadillac on Zeta-NA, or at least a modified version of it.
I think that's a real long shot. I certainly don't think that GM is prepared to spend much, if any money on something like that, unless you're suggesting a Zeta based SUV to replace the Escalade? Even then....

I see the handwriting on the wall. Zeta has a very short life expectancy in NA. That's pretty much a done deal.

My concern is for the Camaro. Not just now, but in the future. It makes little sense to dedicate a whole assembly line to an orphaned Zeta Camaro for very long. Therefore, I'd expect those within GM who are friends of the Camaro, to already be pitching a 6th gen.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #43  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Originally Posted by guionM
I pointed out in another thread that the actual amount of money spent developing the Camaro is relatively a pittance compared to what is normally spent on a new model... even with off the shelf parts. the amount spent on the new Camaro... absolute tops... doesn't seem to even be double what was spent on the 1998 redesign looking.

That being the case, it doesn't seem Camaro NEEDS Impala or a high volume Zeta.... or NEEDS to have that long of a run to recover it's investment.
There is just no way I can believe that the entire 09 Camaro cost only twice as much as retooling the hood, front fenders, headlights and wheels on the 98 Camaro.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 07:44 PM
  #44  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by Z284ever
I think that's a real long shot. I certainly don't think that GM is prepared to spend much, if any money on something like that, unless you're suggesting a Zeta based SUV to replace the Escalade? Even then....

I see the handwriting on the wall. Zeta has a very short life expectancy in NA. That's pretty much a done deal.

My concern is for the Camaro. Not just now, but in the future. It makes little sense to dedicate a whole assembly line to an orphaned Zeta Camaro for very long. Therefore, I'd expect those within GM who are friends of the Camaro, to already be pitching a 6th gen.
Sorry. But it sure seems to me that your judgment in speculations such as this is clouded by your dislike of certain attributes of the new Camaro itself.
Old Jan 19, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #45  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Sorry. But it sure seems to me that your judgment in speculations such as this is clouded by your dislike of certain attributes of the new Camaro itself.
I dont think so . Save for definately the Camaro and maybe one more Zeta ( not including the imported G8 ) it sure does sound still born to me as far as NA is concerned .



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 PM.