I keep hearing that American doesn't need 3 car companies, but...
#61
i think you ignore the japanese market. GM is profitable in all foreign countries except here.
A focus solely on product is how the competition is fought. Tariffs in theory should prevent imports or at the least cause them to be higher priced and less desirable.
The foreign automakers laughed at the tariff and worked around it out smarting everything we had. Fool us once, shame on us, fool us twice.....
The big three can be competitive on product alone and they need to do it here first. Penetration into other protective foreign markets can be a future goal they can pursue once healthy for the fight.
A focus solely on product is how the competition is fought. Tariffs in theory should prevent imports or at the least cause them to be higher priced and less desirable.
The foreign automakers laughed at the tariff and worked around it out smarting everything we had. Fool us once, shame on us, fool us twice.....
The big three can be competitive on product alone and they need to do it here first. Penetration into other protective foreign markets can be a future goal they can pursue once healthy for the fight.
#62
The playing field needs to be leveled, I'd rather see a $5000 tariff on every imported car from outside North America.
Big 3 are a mess and need to be restructured, I wish I knew what the best way was. They will need some loans to pay for that restructuring, American laws make it easier for a company to grow than contract. America needs the heavy manufacturing infrastructure, it would be foolish to throw it away.
Big 3 are a mess and need to be restructured, I wish I knew what the best way was. They will need some loans to pay for that restructuring, American laws make it easier for a company to grow than contract. America needs the heavy manufacturing infrastructure, it would be foolish to throw it away.
Tariffs are THE reason the transplant facilities are in the U.S. in the first place...do you really think more of the same is going to give a different result?
People didn't stop buying Detroit products overnight; Detroit lost its market because Detroit chose not to compete - there isn't a single thing wrong with Detroit that Detroit couldn't have fixed on its own (supposed subsidies of foreign brands notwithstanding) and there is no reason why Detroit can't go toe to tow with ANY other manufacturer (even subsidized ones) and win the battle for customers other than its own lack of will.
#63
You know; that is an excellent point...if the Detroit Three had truly competed here, in their "home" market; there is no reason why they couldn't be so profitable here that they wouldn't need a foreign market presence at all or at least could pursue foreign markets from a position of strength.
#64
I had a feeling you just made the information up and don't have a source. I also don't have the data, but it is my understanding that from about 1850 - 1975 the USA ran mostly trade surpluses. We made a lot of money selling great products and natural resources to other nations. Back in the 1930's the US was the Saudi Arabia of the oil industry. We used to be the worlds largest oil exporter.
#65
I had a feeling you just made the information up and don't have a source. I also don't have the data, but it is my understanding that from about 1850 - 1975 the USA ran mostly trade surpluses. We made a lot of money selling great products and natural resources to other nations. Back in the 1930's the US was the Saudi Arabia of the oil industry. We used to be the worlds largest oil exporter.
It's probably just as well you not waste your time researching as I doubt you would change your mind regardless of what data you found.
#66
Here is some data that goes back to 1960. Looks like we did have a trade surplus for all of the 60's and a couple years in the 70's. From then on it just gets ugly.
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/...ical/gands.pdf
http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/...ical/gands.pdf
#67
An interesting response from someone whose favorite lines are"What's your source?" and "Where's the proof?" (paraphrasing because, well, I don't have time to look up your exact quotes. ) :blah:
#68
Not everything can be reduced to a single web link nor can an adult lifetime of living this kind of data be reduced to a paragraph in an internet board.
Last edited by Robert_Nashville; 12-09-2008 at 12:12 PM.
#69
Unlike the responses I typically get after asking that type of question; I provided several sources for the data.
Not everything can be reduced to a single web link nor can an adult lifetime of living this kind of data be reduced to a paragraph in an internet board.
Not everything can be reduced to a single web link nor can an adult lifetime of living this kind of data be reduced to a paragraph in an internet board.
#71
Not everything can be reduced to a single web link nor can an adult lifetime of living this kind of data be reduced to a paragraph in an internet board.
Hello, Pot? This is the Kettle...
Do you have a real point to make here or do you just want to argue?
Hello, Pot? This is the Kettle...
#72
Since you decided to jump into the thread; I'm sure you have a great handle on the topic that was being discussed...perhaps you would care to elaborate on the meaning and importance of the U.S. balance of trade and the consequences and benefits of carrying a surplus and/or a deficit?
Last edited by Robert_Nashville; 12-09-2008 at 01:27 PM.
#73
Trade deficits can be maintained if one's country creates enough wealth to increase both its own prosperity and that of the rest of the world in an amount sufficiently greater than the deficit.
Anyone who would argue that we're in a position to do so today has probably been sleeping since the 60s.
Anyone who would argue that we're in a position to do so today has probably been sleeping since the 60s.
#74
People far smarter than I (or you, Eric…no offense) would state that there is nothing neither inherently “good” with a trade surplus nor inherently “bad” about running a trade deficit.
Those same people will also cite that even with many decades of trade deficits, the U.S. economy was creating jobs and still THE economy the rest of the world wanted to and did invest in…unfortunately, the ridiculous housing bubble, which fueled a lot of the recent economic boom we were enjoying, finally burst (as it was always destined to do).
But even taking the downturn of the past 8-12 months into consideration, and going back to the original post about the current trade deficit, I suggested earlier in the thread, and it’s never been challenged, that much of this year’s deficit is due to the record high crude oil prices…take that away and I would suggest that the number would not look so frightening.
Those same people will also cite that even with many decades of trade deficits, the U.S. economy was creating jobs and still THE economy the rest of the world wanted to and did invest in…unfortunately, the ridiculous housing bubble, which fueled a lot of the recent economic boom we were enjoying, finally burst (as it was always destined to do).
But even taking the downturn of the past 8-12 months into consideration, and going back to the original post about the current trade deficit, I suggested earlier in the thread, and it’s never been challenged, that much of this year’s deficit is due to the record high crude oil prices…take that away and I would suggest that the number would not look so frightening.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-03-2014 12:30 PM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
11-30-2014 08:41 AM