Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Hypothetical...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2007, 07:36 PM
  #46  
West South Central Moderator
 
AdioSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Kilgore TX 75662
Posts: 3,372
I'd say that trucks have become today's hot rods. They are relatively cheap and very easy to fix up.
AdioSS is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 07:51 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
CaminoLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
I'd say that Alpha is the answer.

Imagine the Cobalt SS/TC engine in a well-balanced, attractive, small RWD coupe. Especially one engineered to handle more potent powerplant configurations as well.
CaminoLS6 is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 11:26 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
DAKMOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Philaduhphia
Posts: 1,406
^Modern Nova?
DAKMOR is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:36 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
CaminoLS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Something very much like it.
CaminoLS6 is offline  
Old 11-03-2007, 09:42 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
RussStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Exton, Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,011
Originally Posted by SSbaby
There are those who believe our beloved V8s are 'dinosaurs'. You can't change their mindset... they won't ever consider driving one no matter how good we V8 owners know they are.

I probably would never own a ricer myself... so maybe I'm the same, just older.
There are youngers guys like that, but in my experiences they are few and far between. The anti-v8 feelings the ricer crowd is supposed to feel gets greatly exaggerated. Young guys aren't buying v8s because they hate them, they aren't buying them because they can't afford them. As it was mentioned, the ricer movement started because young guys started taking their hand-me-down pieces of crap and started modifying them.

I don't think the Cobalt is the answer to the OP's question. Most people I went to school with didn't seem to give it much credit, especially compared to the SRT-4. I don't know why it doesn't but my experiences insist to me that it doesn't. I think for a cheap hotrod a young guy would possibly buy, the answer lies in some variant of the Solstice, as mentioned. If it were cheap enough, and a hard top, it would be something GM offers that nobody else really has on the market right now.
RussStang is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:48 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
dav305z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 757
It's called a Camaro Z/28. GM built in 2002, and it's perfect car for kids to hotrod, given that it's a pretty good deal to get in the V8 game.

I bet in three or four years the 2004-2007 GTO will also find its way into the hands of the younger set.
dav305z is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 12:03 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Big Als Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 4,306
You need to first look into what you mean by "hot rod".

Hot Rod, to me, is usually a mishmash of parts that have been taken from other cars, put together for a fast car, and done on the cheap. Its usually not something you can buy from the dealer, but something that you got from a used lot, or something you pulled out of the junkyard in roller form.

Now, what I think you are refering too is a modern day, factory built, Muscle car or personal performance car. Buying a new car defeats several purposes. Its usually much more expensive then getting a used car, its modability isnt that great since its new, and not everyone wants to drop more money into a new car that they just bought and void the warranty, which is one of the reasons people buy new cars.

What more people in that range want (since Im one of them) is a car thats already been out. A car that has a heavy aftermarket already built for it due to the demand of the car.
Cars like this include
Camaro/Firebird
Impala SS/Caprice
Mustang
W bodies with SC motor
Civic and sister cars
VW 1.8T cars
Big 3 trucks

Newwer additions are the GTO, Cobalt SS, SRT4, Sentra, 240/300/350Z, and some others as price comes down. Even C4 Vettes are now in the price range for 18-25 kids with not a ton of money, but they arre eqiuped with either cheap to build LT1s or cheaper to build L98's.

Now, if GM were to build a new generation of performance machines for the 18-25 crowd, I think they are doing it now. Sky and Solstice Turbo cars, Turbo Cobalt and HHR, Camaro. You could look to the 303hp V8 W bodies as well, especially the GXP. The Ecotec motor is quickly becoming GM's new SBC as the engine is starting to dominate sport compact competitions. These are fast cars that people of my generation can pick up.

GM is doing its part to get the new age enthuisats looking into GM dealers.
Big Als Z is offline  
Old 11-04-2007, 11:22 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
DAKMOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Philaduhphia
Posts: 1,406
Hell, this guy is right. I dream of a mid engine Aveo with the 2.0L Ecotec S/C. Sleeper like all hell!
DAKMOR is offline  
Old 11-05-2007, 06:29 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clinton TWP, MI
Posts: 650
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
I'd say that Alpha is the answer.

Imagine the Cobalt SS/TC engine in a well-balanced, attractive, small RWD coupe. Especially one engineered to handle more potent powerplant configurations as well.
This is exactly what I want and I've been saying it for years.
2K1SunsetSS is offline  
Old 11-05-2007, 06:47 AM
  #55  
Super Moderator
 
JakeRobb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Okemos, MI
Posts: 9,488
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
cobalt SS T/C.
Fixed that for you.
JakeRobb is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 AM.