Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Hypothetical...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-01-2007, 08:07 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
number77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
Hypothetical...

IF GM was building this generation's (18-25 year olds) low cost hotrod...

1. What do you think it would be?
number77 is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 08:35 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
97z28/m6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: oshawa,ontario,canada
Posts: 3,597
cobalt SS S/C.
97z28/m6 is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 08:59 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
yellow_99_gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 394
Cobalt SS + AWD
yellow_99_gt is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:22 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Steve0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by yellow_99_gt
Cobalt SS + AWD
People would complain when an AWD Cobalt SS would end up costing $28,000.

The Cobalt SS is up there, especially the new turbo charged version. The Solstice/Saturn Sky aren't bad sports cars either, and not too expensive.
Steve0 is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:24 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Camaro, but cheaper....Solstice 2+2 maybe
Z28x is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Steve0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,327
This thread poses the question, how do you define a "low cost hotrod."

To me its a well performing sporty car with a base price under $25,000...
Steve0 is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:31 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Sharker524's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 255
Originally Posted by Steve0
This thread poses the question, how do you define a "low cost hotrod."

To me its a well performing sporty car with a base price under $20,000...
It's called the Solstice hardtop. RWD coupe, very attractive/stylish...Under $20K.

Z28x- WhyTF does it need to be a 2+2? If all it's got is four cylinders, leave it a 2 seater. Let the Camaro take the 2+2 market. The Solstice hardtop should top out(with GXP) a good bit below the V8 Camaro bases. There would be overlap with the V6 models, which are actually decent, sporty cars. So if someone wants a 2+2, they can get one for the same price as a Solstice hardtop with a few options. I know they won't be sitting next to each other on lots, but people know what they are looking for.
A 2+2 Solstice would not only look horrendous, it'd also be slower and handle ****tier. So no 2+2 Kappa. Bad dog. That's what Alpha is for(Later, though).

Last edited by Sharker524; 11-01-2007 at 09:50 PM.
Sharker524 is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:51 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
Around here, Colbalt SS's could be had for right at, or just under $25 G's, if you shop around..
I'd say the Cobalt SS is it.
Tho, I would say making it RWD, or an AWD version would be better.

Last edited by 90rocz; 11-01-2007 at 09:53 PM.
90rocz is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 09:58 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
SSbaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,123
Subaru WRX AWD or Mitsubishi Lancer EVO AWD - something non-V8. GM are not making inroads into the ricer crowd.
SSbaby is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 10:05 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
OutsiderIROC-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Middle of Kansas
Posts: 2,688
Originally Posted by number77
IF GM was building this generation's (18-25 year olds) low cost hotrod...

1. What do you think it would be?
They aren't building a hotrod...
OutsiderIROC-Z is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 10:20 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Evilfrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Alton IL
Posts: 751
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Around here, Colbalt SS's could be had for right at, or just under $25 G's, if you shop around..
I'd say the Cobalt SS is it.
Tho, I would say making it RWD, or an AWD version would be better.
Really? Thats kinda high. I loaded cobalt SS goes around $25. Starts at $21.
Evilfrog is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 10:35 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
Yeah, that's why my friend drove to Indiana for his...
90rocz is offline  
Old 11-01-2007, 11:14 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Steve0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,327
Originally Posted by Evilfrog
Really? Thats kinda high. I loaded cobalt SS goes around $25. Starts at $21.
$25k? Are you sure?

If you get the GU5 package or whatever its called with Recaro's and the LSD, I think you can sticker up over $25k. I remember doing a dealer search back when I graduated college, and I remember quite a few coming back stickering really close to $27000. How much was a fully loaded regular Cobalt SS minus the package? I believe the performance package was an extra $1500 or so on top of whatever other options you have. I'm sure you could negotiate it down, but still thats what it stickered.

Whatever the sticker price was, it was enough to dissuade me from looking at the car any further brand new when used examples with low milage went for $8k under sticker.
Steve0 is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:33 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
GRNcamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: albany, ny
Posts: 666
Originally Posted by Steve0
This thread poses the question, how do you define a "low cost hotrod."

To me its a well performing sporty car with a base price under $25,000...
i agree with you that it would have to cost below 25,000
Originally Posted by Z28x
Camaro, but cheaper....Solstice 2+2 maybe
camaro is a good idea but maybe a new type of car is needed similar idea but more performance orientated.

Originally Posted by SSbaby
Subaru WRX AWD or Mitsubishi Lancer EVO AWD - something non-V8. GM are not making inroads into the ricer crowd.
i disagree with this statement. a very cheap low cost v8 car is what gm needs. not that it could happen ever happen but if gm could make a 20,000 v8 sports coupe that would be perfect.

the tuner crowd popped up not because they were into imports. They popped up because they were young guys looking to get into cars and didnt have much cash to start with. Imports like civics could be had cheap and were readily avalible. And at the time upgrade parts were cheap.


to me if Gm has to build the hot rod of today. it would be a sports coupe. a large displacement simple v6 a small displacement simple v8 cheap. Gm worked with the after market to have parts avalible and then advertise it as a cheap sports car for the young and supported by a large after market . now we know this would never happen but just my idea.

just making a hotrod type car isnt enough i think that was clearly evident with the prowler. I think the cobalt ss is to expensive and doesn't offer enough.
GRNcamaro is offline  
Old 11-02-2007, 06:48 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
2K1SunsetSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clinton TWP, MI
Posts: 650
Originally Posted by Steve0
$25k? Are you sure?

If you get the GU5 package or whatever its called with Recaro's and the LSD, I think you can sticker up over $25k. I remember doing a dealer search back when I graduated college, and I remember quite a few coming back stickering really close to $27000. How much was a fully loaded regular Cobalt SS minus the package? I believe the performance package was an extra $1500 or so on top of whatever other options you have. I'm sure you could negotiate it down, but still thats what it stickered.

Whatever the sticker price was, it was enough to dissuade me from looking at the car any further brand new when used examples with low milage went for $8k under sticker.

i priced one out(sc/ss) with everything and it was right at 22k if memory serves me right.
2K1SunsetSS is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 PM.