Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

How relevent is Bob Lutz now....?

Old Jan 12, 2009 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
How relevent is Bob Lutz now....?

On the surface..I want to say him still being there shows GM wants to stay serious about good product over beancounting. If he had nothing to do I think he would simply leave. That being said, just how relevent is he? I mean was he envolved in the decision to neuter Pontiac and get out of the mess moving forward? I would imagine his ability to force through some decisions relating to better product has severely been crimped due to the collapse of the market.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 03:01 PM
  #2  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
I would hope that he was involved... and I suspect his involvement is the only thing that kept Pontiac alive in reduced form, rather than eliminated.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 05:20 PM
  #3  
Fbodfather's Avatar
ALMIGHTY MEMBER
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,298
From: Detroit, MI USA
VERY (let me rephrase that...)

VERY relevant..........

If the industry wasn't in such turmoil, there would be no talk about Pontiac -- it would be its own Division.........

.........the world, however, has changed.

I can tell you firsthand that Lutz and Wellburn are the two leaders of a cadre of car guys and gals -- and that's what brings you great cars like Malibu, CTS, ZR1, Camaro, etc..........
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #4  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
A car company can always use a car guy with some good ideas. That will never change.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #5  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by Fbodfather
VERY (let me rephrase that...)

VERY relevant..........

If the industry wasn't in such turmoil, there would be no talk about Pontiac -- it would be its own Division.........

.........the world, however, has changed.

I can tell you firsthand that Lutz and Wellburn are the two leaders of a cadre of car guys and gals -- and that's what brings you great cars like Malibu, CTS, ZR1, Camaro, etc..........
And keep them coming...
Did they have any influence on the new LaCrosse? I might have to get one of those.
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 06:05 PM
  #6  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by 99SilverSS
A car company can always use a car guy with some good ideas. That will never change.
The question becomes, in difficult times, do the right people remember that fact?

Based on Scott's post, it sounds like in this case, the right people did indeed remember. Kudos to them for not forgetting the product while worrying about the finances!
Old Jan 15, 2009 | 10:29 PM
  #7  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
Wonder if there is a chance Pontiac will make a comeback.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
hey01's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 505
From: Jax,FL
Lutz rocks!
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #9  
Ed 2001 SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 499
From: Miami, Fl USA
GM's biggest redeeming quality today, several well designed an executed current cars plus an impressive slate of upcoming vehicles, wouldn't exist without him. Accountants know nothing about how to make an appealing car. I'm glad Lutz is there.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:24 PM
  #10  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
If anyone could bring me back to GM, I still believe it would be Lutz.

Too bad he didn't have dictatorial power - I suspect I'd be much happier today.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:41 PM
  #11  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by Ed 2001 SS
GM's biggest redeeming quality today, several well designed an executed current cars plus an impressive slate of upcoming vehicles, wouldn't exist without him. Accountants know nothing about how to make an appealing car. I'm glad Lutz is there.
Not just accountants, many engineers as well. Six sigma will build you a car that is reliable and meets wants/needs very well... But six sigma has no slots for passion or aggressive styling.

Indeed, without lutz we would not be where we are today. As things in GM change, *we* need him there to protect the products we are interested in.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #12  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Just my personal opinion, but I think Lutz has been a breathe of fresh air for GM.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 01:47 PM
  #13  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Plague
And keep them coming...
Did they have any influence on the new LaCrosse? I might have to get one of those.
In a way, I suppose.

The Lacrosse was designed in China.

Welburne heads design globally, so he probally OKed it before it was released for development.

Lutz coordinates global products, so he OKed it to be sold in the US.


To answer the original question, Bob Lutz is alot more than just "relevent".... how about, "vital"!

It's Lutz that reminds GM's naysayers that cars like the ZR1 does make profits, Camaros are relevent and have a market, & interior materials can't be skimped on (though there's some instances where one has to wonder).

However, he's not infallable.

Killing the G8 ST after all the press despite it being profitable simply for product focus is questionable. The flip-flop-flip-flop on both the Orlando and Beat have no place to go other than his doorstep.

He's also become seemingly far less aggressive (dare I say timid?) than he was when he rammed through both the GTO and the Solstice shortly after his arrival once it was proven both made financial sense. I'm sure alot of it is politics and keeping his powder dry and his capital intact for bigger fish (ie: Camaro).

He's also gone into retreat like a scalded cat on North American Zeta and the Alpha, but at least one can imagine that a failing GM (they didn't get this bad overnight) had alot to do with both.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #14  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Originally Posted by guionM
Killing the G8 ST after all the press despite it being profitable simply for product focus is questionable. The flip-flop-flip-flop on both the Orlando and Beat have no place to go other than his doorstep.

He's also become seemingly far less aggressive (dare I say timid?) ...
I wonder what has happened behind the scenes since he got there to make him more timid. I also wonder if he will change when the dust starts to settle and product becomes more important again.

In terms of the G8 ST, I cant understand why the G8 ST AND Sportwagon weren't brought over. Sales might be small, but every one of them would have been a quality vehicle with a profit margin - AND it would have put better vehicles into a Pontiac showroom. But then again, I love sportwagons and I always liked the el camino.

If Pontiac is reduced to the G8 Lineup as the cornerstone of its fleet, perhaps the Coupe/Sedan/Wagon/Ute will become present. We can only hope GMNA will see the light.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Injuneer
LT1 Based Engine Tech
10
Apr 25, 2022 06:22 PM
marlar98
LT1 Based Engine Tech
15
Sep 12, 2018 07:18 AM
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
tls2000
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
86
Jan 6, 2003 09:07 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
4
Dec 14, 2002 02:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 AM.