Heard on the news today: Ford to sell Volvo and bag Mercury
Scrapping Merc, fine. Concentrate efforts on Ford NA and Lincoln.
But man, why sell Volvo, they're finally making some very good cars and their safety technology is top notch?
I was sitting at a gas station today and this brand new white Volvo coupe, looked like a retractable hardtop (?) with dual exhaust, its the first time I can ever remember saying "man, thats a nice volvo"....
But man, why sell Volvo, they're finally making some very good cars and their safety technology is top notch?
I was sitting at a gas station today and this brand new white Volvo coupe, looked like a retractable hardtop (?) with dual exhaust, its the first time I can ever remember saying "man, thats a nice volvo"....
Last edited by pickardracing; Apr 25, 2008 at 07:17 PM.
volvo wont be sold, ford already tried selling it back with jaguar and land rover, but its still worth too much and they couldnt find a buyer
as for why there is ford and mercury, its because there re alot of people that dont want a ford product, but will still buy amercury, plus it alows you to make very simple variations of the same car. i think mercury should have some of its own vehicles though, but there is still a good reason for it
as for why there is ford and mercury, its because there re alot of people that dont want a ford product, but will still buy amercury, plus it alows you to make very simple variations of the same car. i think mercury should have some of its own vehicles though, but there is still a good reason for it
You can make variations without a Mercury. Call it a Lincoln or just make it a second Ford. However, the most successful current companies don't seem to make variations of a single model, unless they're adding in luxury. So I question whether two or more variations of the same vehicle with minimal functional difference is really a winning strategy.
volvo wont be sold, ford already tried selling it back with jaguar and land rover, but its still worth too much and they couldnt find a buyer
as for why there is ford and mercury, its because there re alot of people that dont want a ford product, but will still buy amercury, plus it alows you to make very simple variations of the same car. i think mercury should have some of its own vehicles though, but there is still a good reason for it
as for why there is ford and mercury, its because there re alot of people that dont want a ford product, but will still buy amercury, plus it alows you to make very simple variations of the same car. i think mercury should have some of its own vehicles though, but there is still a good reason for it
Which platforms do Ford supply to underpin Volvo cars? I thought Volvo's cars were all on their platforms, and in fact supplied chassis for some of Ford's cars, e.g. the Taurus being on the Volvo P2 platform.
The S40, C30, small convertible are all on the Euro Focus's C2 platform right?
IMO, that would would be the perfect idea.
Saturn is Opel USA, and Pontiac's connection to Holden is defining Pontiac's personality. Taking Mercury and using Australia's Ford Falcon line along with Europe's Mondeo line and rounding it out with Mercury's current crossovers (which aren't doing all that bad) would make a pretty strong Mercury lineup IMO.
Saturn is Opel USA, and Pontiac's connection to Holden is defining Pontiac's personality. Taking Mercury and using Australia's Ford Falcon line along with Europe's Mondeo line and rounding it out with Mercury's current crossovers (which aren't doing all that bad) would make a pretty strong Mercury lineup IMO.
It might even be cheaper to launch a new brand (or a sub-brand of Ford) than it would to reinvent Mercury.
They could launch a new brand. Hmm. What about using the German name for Mercury to emphasize the Europeanness of the cars



Seriously though, after you solve the problem of the name, you still have the dealers to deal with, and that (along with Merkur being clumsy on American tongues) contributed to sinking the previous attempt.


