Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GTO dyno sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #1  
95GRNZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,779
From: Denton, TX
Thumbs up GTO dyno sheet

Just saw this on another board, so I thought people might want to discuss it here, too.

http://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...54#post1653154

Doesn't look like underrated, or does it? No mention about the tranny, though...

TS
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 01:40 PM
  #2  
ced8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 576
From: Houston, TX
It's an M6.. Silver color. Got that information from the owner at LS1.com.

Pretty good run and that Torque curve is FLAT....
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 01:47 PM
  #3  
Joe K. 96 Zeee!!'s Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,531
Good find!

Assuming it's really 350 crank HP than that's less than 13% drivetrain loss. If I was to throw up a guess, I'd say it's putting out no more than 360 at the crank.

Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 02:34 PM
  #4  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!

Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
You beat me to it!
I'm sure there has been a number of LS1 Z28's that have put that out.........
Mabye I'm think of the SS dyno's I've seen..........
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
Well don't forget that when it breaks in, those numbers will get a decent bit higher in keeping with other LS1 cars. It's not too impressive right out of the box though since the F-bodies could meet or beat those numbers......................it just shows you how under rated they were.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
At 305rwhp and 328rwtq its not too shabby. I would've expected a little more but there is no telling how many break in miles the car had, hopefully very few. This car could be more in the 310rwhp / 330rwtq range after break in. Its not going to suprise any F-body or pull 12's off the showroom floor but its certainly plenty stout for what it is.

As for a stock LS1 F-body my 99 M6 SS was rated at 320hp but it put down 309rwhp and 327rwtq when it was dynoed, stock 18,000 miles.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 04:41 PM
  #7  
Steve0's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,327
From: Hartford, CT
Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Dont forget that F-bodies are putting that power through a solid rear axle. They have less drivetrain loss.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 04:54 PM
  #8  
hp_nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 293
From: Hou,TX
That's pretty damn good. 360 at the crank. It's 10 more than advertised.

Could be the GTO is cammed for more torque. I'd like to see a bone stock '02 M6 LS1 dyno for comparison.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 05:53 PM
  #9  
Pandamonkey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,417
From: Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Originally posted by Steve0
Dont forget that F-bodies are putting that power through a solid rear axle. They have less drivetrain loss.
How much more is the losses from a IRS setup than from a live axle?
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 07:21 PM
  #10  
jrp4uc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,724
From: Hebron, KY
Thumbs up

Good numbers. People should remember, this GTO isn't just a drag racer.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #11  
the pool boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 137
From: Georgia
Bone stock 02 M6 LS1 dyno in the link in my sig, page two. Very similar numbers.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 11:19 PM
  #12  
hp_nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 293
From: Hou,TX
Originally posted by the pool boy
Bone stock 02 M6 LS1 dyno in the link in my sig, page two. Very similar numbers.
Yup. Any difference can probably be attributed to environmental conditions and the the motor not being broken in. Looks like the '04 GTO motor is the same as the '02 LS1.
Old Jan 26, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #13  
Larnach's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 816
From: San Diego PB
Originally posted by Pandamonkey
How much more is the losses from a IRS setup than from a live axle?
Probably even less, depending on the type of differential. I think its a 8.5 ring gear, I dunno, something like with what Ford did with the 8.8 and the thunderbird.

Plenty efficient.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quickss96
Cars For Sale
6
Jan 29, 2016 05:56 PM
fift5
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
11
Oct 1, 2015 10:31 AM
Daluchman1974
Cars For Sale
1
Sep 11, 2015 06:12 AM
damnyankee36
LS1 Based Engine Tech
5
Sep 9, 2015 07:06 PM
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.