GTO dyno sheet
Just saw this on another board, so I thought people might want to discuss it here, too. 
http://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...54#post1653154
Doesn't look like underrated, or does it?
No mention about the tranny, though...
TS

http://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...54#post1653154
Doesn't look like underrated, or does it?
No mention about the tranny, though...TS
Good find!
Assuming it's really 350 crank HP than that's less than 13% drivetrain loss. If I was to throw up a guess, I'd say it's putting out no more than 360 at the crank.
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Assuming it's really 350 crank HP than that's less than 13% drivetrain loss. If I was to throw up a guess, I'd say it's putting out no more than 360 at the crank.
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
I'm sure there has been a number of LS1 Z28's that have put that out.........

Mabye I'm think of the SS dyno's I've seen..........
Well don't forget that when it breaks in, those numbers will get a decent bit higher in keeping with other LS1 cars. It's not too impressive right out of the box though since the F-bodies could meet or beat those numbers......................it just shows you how under rated they were.
At 305rwhp and 328rwtq its not too shabby. I would've expected a little more but there is no telling how many break in miles the car had, hopefully very few. This car could be more in the 310rwhp / 330rwtq range after break in. Its not going to suprise any F-body or pull 12's off the showroom floor but its certainly plenty stout for what it is.
As for a stock LS1 F-body my 99 M6 SS was rated at 320hp but it put down 309rwhp and 327rwtq when it was dynoed, stock 18,000 miles.
As for a stock LS1 F-body my 99 M6 SS was rated at 320hp but it put down 309rwhp and 327rwtq when it was dynoed, stock 18,000 miles.
Originally posted by Joe K. 96 Zeee!!
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Funny thing is I've seen more than a few 01-02 F-body Dyno's that put up basicly identical numbers.
Originally posted by Steve0
Dont forget that F-bodies are putting that power through a solid rear axle. They have less drivetrain loss.
Dont forget that F-bodies are putting that power through a solid rear axle. They have less drivetrain loss.
Originally posted by the pool boy
Bone stock 02 M6 LS1 dyno in the link in my sig, page two. Very similar numbers.
Bone stock 02 M6 LS1 dyno in the link in my sig, page two. Very similar numbers.
Originally posted by Pandamonkey
How much more is the losses from a IRS setup than from a live axle?
How much more is the losses from a IRS setup than from a live axle?
Plenty efficient.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tdigger9899
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
9
Sep 7, 2015 10:56 AM



