Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2005, 08:04 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Meccadeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,473
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

I've been saying this for a few years now, GM has the most outdated V6's in the industry...its almost embarrasing.
Meccadeth is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 08:28 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
90rocz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Posts: 2,947
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

I don't believe it's a matter of CAN'T, it's probably more of, "we can buy it cheaper than: redesigning, retooling, and recertification"..... "And right now we have neither the TIME or MONEY to devote to reinventing the wheel"....(my opinion paraphrase not GM's)
The lines between companies have become so blurred, is it any wonder people think, "what difference does it make which car I buy?, they all share the same parts"...
Here in Dayton the All Mighty Toyota's struts are made AT THE SAME FACTORY as GM's, by the SAME PEOPLE...
90rocz is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 08:56 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by 305fan
30thZ286speed --you know your Northstars I was wondering if I was the only one!


Yeah GM has way too many V6's but I still see some role for the old 60 degree pushrod engines (HV) Heres what I would do.

Drop 3400, 3800, 3800 S/C and 4.3L
Done
2.8L HF (Buick and Caddys exclusively)
3.6L HF 265 (G6, Grand Prix, Torrent and Buicks)
3.6L HF HO 285hp (RWD Buicks, Caddys)
2.8 will be Saturn/Caddy/SAAB/maybe Buick

3.6 will be Caddy/Buick/maybe Saturn

Why make a higher output version of the 3.6 HF when the 3.8 HF is being built in AUS as we speak?
3.5L 211hp (Malibus, Impalas, Equinnox, G6, Equinox)
3900 245 (Malibus, Impalas, Equinnox)
3.5 is in all but the Nox now and will be within the next year or so. Probably will wait till the 6 speed auto is ready for emmissions validation with the 3.5.

Put the HF engines optional in Pontiacs while Chevy gets all the HV lineup.
Buick and Caddy gets all HF V6. This would offer some meaningfull differentation, mechanically between the brands.
Agreed.
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 05-02-2005, 09:39 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
305fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,308
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by Meccadeth
I've been saying this for a few years now, GM has the most outdated V6's in the industry...its almost embarrasing.

Well I would say Fords are worse. Chryslers aren't so hot either and they have a few. There 3.5L 253hp V6 gets wasted by the CTS 3.6L.

I haven't heard of the 3.8L HF V6--have to check that out.
305fan is offline  
Old 05-03-2005, 03:09 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
Meccadeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,473
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by 305fan
Well I would say Fords are worse. Chryslers aren't so hot either and they have a few. There 3.5L 253hp V6 gets wasted by the CTS 3.6L.

I haven't heard of the 3.8L HF V6--have to check that out.
Well...I should say American V6's in general. Fords are horrible too
Meccadeth is offline  
Old 05-03-2005, 09:04 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
morb|d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Posts: 1,440
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Since your reading comprehension is poor let me spell it out for you.

GM/Izusu traded their overseas diesels for a Honda motor. GM decided the 3.5 was the best bet.

Duramax is a partnership between GM and Izusu it has NOTHING to do with Honda. The common rail turbos that GM got out of the Fiat fiasco will be coming to the states, the factories are GMs now. If ANYONE is ahead of the game on diesels it is GM.
those diesel's are going NOWHERE unless they pass the new emissions out for 2006-7. If VW and Mercedes are backing out of their US diesel sales due to failing new emissions standards, you can be SURE the Fiat designed diesel isn't going to pass.

The only place those engines will help is like 3 countries in Europe. THAT'S IT.
morb|d is offline  
Old 05-03-2005, 09:12 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
morb|d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
Posts: 1,440
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by Z28x
3.4L and 3800 are on there way out, but they can't be replaced overnight, They are paid for looooong ago so it really doesn't cost much for GM to keep them around.

AronZ28 what are the 9 V6's? you only listed 7. 3.9L & 3.5L HV, 2.8, 3.6L HF, 3800, 3400, Honda V6. That is all GM uses in the USA, thats 7 not 9.

Hi Value V6's are $800 cheaper to build than DOHC HF V6's!!!

Think of them as a filler between a 4 cyl. and a HF V6. Eventually GM will have 2 lines of V6's for cars. THe HF & HV. This is fine in my book. If you have a value priced car like the Malibu or Impala why would GM spend $800 on a DOHC 2.8L when they can get the same HP and more torque out of a In-block-cam 3.5L V6 and save $2000 off the MSRP. I read before that Honda DOHC engines cost as much as an LS1. I don't know about you, but If I'm spending the same money I'd rather have an LS1 (or new DoD LS4)
how about we turn the pictue on its ear and look at it from a different perspective? If GM put a OHC engine into an Impala that costs $800 more to produce they could KEEP the MSRP the same but deal away with offering a $5000 rebate. Which way makes more sense again?

Last edited by morb|d; 05-03-2005 at 09:14 PM.
morb|d is offline  
Old 05-03-2005, 09:24 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
91_z28_4me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Pewee Valley, KY
Posts: 4,600
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by morb|d
those diesel's are going NOWHERE unless they pass the new emissions out for 2006-7. If VW and Mercedes are backing out of their US diesel sales due to failing new emissions standards, you can be SURE the Fiat designed diesel isn't going to pass.

The only place those engines will help is like 3 countries in Europe. THAT'S IT.
I think GM would look ahead, since they plan things almost a decade ahead, and make new engines that are low emissions. it shouldn't be that hard since we are getting away from high sulfur fuel.
91_z28_4me is offline  
Old 05-04-2005, 08:33 AM
  #39  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
AronZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chattanoga & Franklin
Posts: 1,276
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

I heard that we are getting low sulfer diesel fuel in the next few years. This would allow any diesel to pass the emissions tests much more easily. Hopefully all this will bear to fruit, because I would pick up a K1500 mini-duramax diesel Silverado any day of the week over the gas V8 version if it got better mileage and made the same amount of power. Or they could install the same Duramax in 3500 into a 1500. We'd have much lighter diesel hot rods now.
AronZ28 is offline  
Old 05-04-2005, 08:41 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Z28x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 10,287
Re: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.

Originally Posted by morb|d
how about we turn the pictue on its ear and look at it from a different perspective? If GM put a OHC engine into an Impala that costs $800 more to produce they could KEEP the MSRP the same but deal away with offering a $5000 rebate. Which way makes more sense again?
I'd rather have a 3.9L VVT OHV and the $5000 cash than a OHC V6. 98% of the mainstream sedan public doesn't even know what OHC stands for.

3.5L HV = 211HP/220tq
2.8L HF = 210HP/194tq

I can't see the avg. value sedan buyer paying more just so they can say they have an OHC engine.

Originally Posted by AronZ28
I heard that we are getting low sulfer diesel fuel in the next few years. This would allow any diesel to pass the emissions tests much more easily. Hopefully all this will bear to fruit, because I would pick up a K1500 mini-duramax diesel Silverado any day of the week over the gas V8 version if it got better mileage and made the same amount of power. Or they could install the same Duramax in 3500 into a 1500. We'd have much lighter diesel hot rods now.
4.9L Duramax V6 with 450 lb-ft of torque in the 1500 series trucks would be awesome

Last edited by Z28x; 05-04-2005 at 08:44 AM.
Z28x is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Victor Lamb
Suspension, Chassis, and Brakes
3
08-26-2017 02:52 PM
Roadie
Parts For Sale
7
02-16-2015 10:34 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
01-29-2015 07:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
1
01-08-2015 11:29 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
12-28-2014 06:20 PM



Quick Reply: GM powertrain has their heads up their a@@es regarding V6's.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.