Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM Picked As Strike Target

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #16  
Josh452's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Just updated my coverage on www.TheGMSource.com

We are close to it being done and GM unloading $30 Billion in healthcare on to the Union.......the only issue right now (that is not being published) is that the Union wants GM to come off with a couple a billion more than they want to in order to fund the VEBA.
Old Sep 14, 2007 | 11:33 PM
  #17  
Josh452's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
I've just been told exclusively that the talks are extended an hour, and are rumored to be going hour by hour at this point.

The teams are going all night it appears.
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 04:29 AM
  #18  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Looking like there're very close to an agreement.
Old Sep 15, 2007 | 04:38 AM
  #19  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by Derek M
Yea who cares about giving the employees some actual empowerment or job security. Most Americans really prefer to be laid off or fired on the spot just because the company has chosen to do so. If it were for unions in the auto industry you can guarantee that many more Americans would be out of work today.

Some also are of the mindset that the unions hay days, back earlier this century, help level set acceptable work places and ethics of which most of us still benefit today.

CNN posted a stat that the state of Michigan has lost 300k jobs in the last 6 years alone. Makes you wonder without unions how many more people in the US would be out of work and jobs shifted over to foreign countries. Comes down to what if anything is worth saving or keeping in our country.
Good points all around.

I'll be the 1st to point out how unions went overboard, and shot themselves in the head over the years. But over the past few years, unions (though appearing standoffish to the outsider) has been far and away more responsible and has done their fair share in helping US makers get their act together.

But I don't buy into those who engage in completely mindless union bashing, and lay all the blame of the faltering US car industry at their feet. The 1st and largest level of blame for the current state of affairs is the management of US car companies. If US car companies got as serious about quality and put as much effort into cars 7-10 years ago as they have been been doing the past couple of years, Toyota would still be 2nd fiddle to GM (or even 3rd to Ford or 4th to Chrysler), and the Korean transplants wouldn't stand a chance.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 01:48 PM
  #20  
93Phoenix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 392
From: Roch, NY
Sweet! Extend those 15 min coffee breaks every hour to 25 minutes, raise the unskilled workers from $40/hr to $50/hr, make overtime 2.0X, and finally pay their entire extended families health coverage. Unions FTW!
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #21  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by 94Camaro_Z_28
Speaking of, we actually have a company here in Iowa that got raided by INS back in 2006. Just this week, they're filing suit on behalf of the "workers" that were caught and arrested because the raid "violated their constitutional rights"
Illegal immigrants shouldn't have constitutional rights if they are not a citizen. They shouldn't have came into the country illegally and then file a law suit about being caught. That reminds of the border patrol agent that heard shots fired and then fired at an illegal immigrant who was smuggling drugs, and then went to jail because he shot the illegal immigrant.

Such crap.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 02:39 PM
  #22  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by Plague
Illegal immigrants shouldn't have constitutional rights if they are not a citizen.
Everyone in US territory, citizen or not, has "constitutional rights". The Constitution constrains the government, not the people.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 03:45 PM
  #23  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by 93Phoenix
Sweet! Extend those 15 min coffee breaks every hour to 25 minutes, raise the unskilled workers from $40/hr to $50/hr, make overtime 2.0X, and finally pay their entire extended families health coverage. Unions FTW!
Venomous, nosensical sarcasm falls under the heading of mindless union bashing, since that's not even the issue. I find your descriptions pretty fanciful as well. Did you come up with that yourself, or did someone program that into you??

Perhaps you should actually study the facts before you jump in on this one.

Last edited by guionM; Sep 17, 2007 at 03:48 PM.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 04:04 PM
  #24  
91_z28_4me's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,600
From: Pewee Valley, KY
Originally Posted by guionM
Looking like there're very close to an agreement.
Anything on an agreement?
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 04:44 PM
  #25  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Everyone in US territory, citizen or not, has "constitutional rights". The Constitution constrains the government, not the people.
True, every "person" has rights protected by our constitution but that does note mean this suit has any real substance.

There seems to be a growing belief by some "pro-illegal alian" groups that they have a "right" to be here...they do not.

All persons, including illegal aliens, have a right to due process and being presumed innocent until proven guilty, etc., etc., they do not have a right to be here illegally nor do they have a right to not have ICE raid their place of employment and begin processing them for deportation.

Last edited by Robert_Nashville; Sep 25, 2007 at 12:46 PM.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #26  
Ken S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 2,368
From: OR
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...13/1148/AUTO01
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:19 PM
  #27  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
Originally Posted by georgejetson
Everyone in US territory, citizen or not, has "constitutional rights". The Constitution constrains the government, not the people.
That is a good point. but what if we decided that the Constitution only limits the government with respect to it's actions related to citizens and it was not in fact limited in action towards noncitizens?
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 08:03 PM
  #28  
georgejetson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 689
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
That is a good point. but what if we decided that the Constitution only limits the government with respect to it's actions related to citizens and it was not in fact limited in action towards noncitizens?
Then parts of the US that make a lot of money off of tourists would make a lot less money.
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #29  
scott9050's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 1,547
From: Panhandle of West Virginia
Originally Posted by robvas
You don't need unions when you have illegals!
Yep. If amnesty had passed the Unions would have loved their $10 an hour replacements.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Formula Steve
LT1 Based Engine Tech
45
Sep 19, 2023 08:31 AM
Bigfatrat
Parts Wanted
3
Oct 16, 2015 04:48 PM
WobblySausage
LT1 Based Engine Tech
6
Oct 7, 2015 02:44 PM
WobblySausage
Drivetrain
4
Oct 7, 2015 10:09 AM
1994formy
Wheels and Tires
5
Sep 28, 2015 01:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.