Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM has a plan to keep Pontiac buyers...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:22 AM
  #31  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Captain Jeff Z28
Very good point. I've seen a lot of (not to stereotype) women, driving G8's.

Jeff


Now that you mention that, the cleaning girl at our office, probably about 35 years old, etc... has a V6 G8 in the nice bright blue color.

Her previous car was a yellow Cobalt SS 2 door............................
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:37 AM
  #32  
Captain Jeff Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 545
From: Fort Erie, Ont.
Originally Posted by Darth Xed
Now that you mention that, the cleaning girl at our office, probably about 35 years old, etc... has a V6 G8 in the nice bright blue color.

Her previous car was a yellow Cobalt SS 2 door............................
...And while we're on the subject, I passed a red 2010 Camaro yesterday and so, performing what I felt was my duty, made an effort to give the driver a thumbs up.


..Only to be 100% ignored by the woman driving it.

Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:56 AM
  #33  
Raven99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 224
From: Lincolnwood IL
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
From you sig, I gather Pontiac didn't have anything in the last few years you felt worthy of purchase either. Otherwise you would have one rather than a Scion...
100% correct. Pontiac didn't have anything to compare to the xB. Nothing. The closest thing in GM's lineup that did was the HHR. If GM made a Pontiac version of the HHR then perhaps that would have been my daily driver.

Also, the Solstice GXP Coupe was on my short list of new cars to purchase, but we all know how that went - not gonna buy a one-year only model from a dead brand.

For the foreseable future, GM is dead to me.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 10:59 AM
  #34  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
Originally Posted by Raven99
100% correct. Pontiac didn't have anything to compare to the xB. Nothing. The closest thing in GM's lineup that did was the HHR.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #35  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Raven99
100% correct. Pontiac didn't have anything to compare to the xB. Nothing. The closest thing in GM's lineup that did was the HHR. If GM made a Pontiac version of the HHR then perhaps that would have been my daily driver.

Also, the Solstice GXP Coupe was on my short list of new cars to purchase, but we all know how that went - not gonna buy a one-year only model from a dead brand.

For the foreseable future, GM is dead to me.
I'm sorry to hear that that is the case for you at this point.

Hopefully that will change in the future.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #36  
Raven99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 224
From: Lincolnwood IL
Originally Posted by 97z28/m6
Not even close Vibes weren't comparable to the HHR, IMO. I'd purchase an HHR before a Vibe. Or a Honda Fit. Or a number of other cars.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #37  
Raven99's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 224
From: Lincolnwood IL
Originally Posted by 1fastdog
I'm sorry to hear that that is the case for you at this point.

Hopefully that will change in the future.
I hope so too! I grew up inspired by GM cars - Corvettes, Camaros, Firebirds, Chevelles, 442s, El Caminos, Monte Carlos, Grand Prix, Fieros, Syclones, the list goes on and on....

I am a car guy for life because of GM cars. For now though, all I can do is wait and hope for some product that I can get the same feelings of inspiration and passion for. Right now, other than the Vette, GM doesn't have anything else that does that for me.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:16 PM
  #38  
Jason E's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,376
From: Sarasota FL
Originally Posted by Z28x
Fantastic point. I used to be one of those GP owners.

Now that the G6 is gone I think it is time for a Malibu coupe. Offer it with the DI 2.4L for the commuters and Turbo DI 2.0L for the performance guys.

Camaro doesn't cut it for the GP coupe owners, it has too small of a back seat. We really need the Holden Commodore in North America
Thanks for agreeing with me, unlike Darth!!!!

Darth,

1) RWD is not FWD. For many people that is a LEGITIMATE reason to like a Malibu coupe over a Camaro
2) Sit in a W body coupe, then sit in a Camaro, and tell me the size and comfort level is the same. It isn't. The visability alone takes a significant amount of GP owners out of that car.

Camaro does NOT replace the idea of a FWD Chevy coupe...at all...a Grand Prix and a 4th gen were two ENTIRELY different animals.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:30 PM
  #39  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Jason E
Thanks for agreeing with me, unlike Darth!!!!

Darth,

1) RWD is not FWD. For many people that is a LEGITIMATE reason to like a Malibu coupe over a Camaro
I agree.... and why I really thought AWD on the Camaro as a base model option would have been great.

2) Sit in a W body coupe, then sit in a Camaro, and tell me the size and comfort level is the same. It isn't. The visability alone takes a significant amount of GP owners out of that car.

I would accept more difference between the Camaro and W-body than the Camaro and the G6 coupe...

Still, this is a market that has shrunk to extinction... Thunderbird, Grand Prix coupe, then finally Monte Carlo... all gone, and it doesnt seen as though many care. We had two MC SS's (2001 and 2002)... loved them, but I think this falls back on the who fact that 4 doors does not equal a stigma anymore... and thus this market has shrunk a lot, where a purpose-driven vehicle like Camaro mat have seen some actual growth.


Camaro does NOT replace the idea of a FWD Chevy coupe...at all...a Grand Prix and a 4th gen were two ENTIRELY different animals.
Again I agree they are not the same, I just feel that a lot people in the Monte Carlo / GP Coupe market can choose from Camaro and/or Impala, Malibu, LaCrosse, and you will only lose a handful that had any chance of sticking around anyway. (PS: This statement notes that Impala needs redone at this point... assumes a contender in that slot)
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:30 PM
  #40  
formula79's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,698
From: USA
It is easy to equate that to today's lineup. However today's less focused lineup is the reason Pontiac is being cancelled. Go back 5-7 years ago, and Pontiac was VERY focused. You would not cross shop a Grand Am or Grand Prix with a Malibu or Impala. They appealed to different people..just like a pair fo Air Jordan's to a pair of Doc Martens.

Originally Posted by Darth Xed
While this thread has focused almost entirely on how GM is making a joke of themselves by trying to retain G8 customers with what isi currently available in their other divisions...... I would guess that only G8 and Solstice customers would not be able to find a legit alternative in another line.

G3 = Aveo.

G5 = Cobalt.

G6 Sedan = Malibu.

G6 Coupe = Camaro. I know others feel differently, but I don't. The V6 Camaro price point should make this viable.

G6 convertible = Camaro convertible when it comes out.

G8 = Nothing, though I would argue there are SOME G8 customers that would probably buy an Impala. Not everyone who buys a G8 is a gearhead. taking it outside of Chevy for a moment, I thin kthe new LaCrosse is also an alternative if you want somethign fresher than Impala.

Solstice = Nothing, though if they just want a sporty car, a Camaro could fill the bill... but granted, they are not much alike at all.

Torrent = Equinox.




So... we have to remember that Pontiac did NOT = G8. It equaled ALL of those vehicles, so the idea of making efforts to retain Pontiac customers, and reflecting back ont he Olds losses is quite a smart move.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 12:33 PM
  #41  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by formula79
It is easy to equate that to today's lineup. However today's less focused lineup is the reason Pontiac is being cancelled. Go back 5-7 years ago, and Pontiac was VERY focused. You would not cross shop a Grand Am or Grand Prix with a Malibu or Impala. They appealed to different people..just like a pair fo Air Jordan's to a pair of Doc Martens.

I can agree with that to a point. Especially the old Malibu vs the old Grand Am.

I would say in that time frame though, that there were still peopel cross shopping Impala and Prand Prix, especially base Grand Prix... rmeember, not all of them were GTP's...

FWIW, with all the G8 talk, I felt it most appropriate to compare what is offered today.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #42  
rlchv70's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 681
Originally Posted by formula79
It is easy to equate that to today's lineup. However today's less focused lineup is the reason Pontiac is being cancelled. Go back 5-7 years ago, and Pontiac was VERY focused. You would not cross shop a Grand Am or Grand Prix with a Malibu or Impala. They appealed to different people..just like a pair fo Air Jordan's to a pair of Doc Martens.
Pontiac 5-7 years ago was panned for the plastic body cladding and for the Aztec. In order to fix that, they dropped both. They also dropped the Sunfire. The dealers cried foul and we got the G3 and G5. Today's Pontiac is what it is because that is what the "people" wanted.

Last edited by rlchv70; Jul 10, 2009 at 01:54 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:03 PM
  #43  
Maximum Bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 178
Yes, but look at who the "people" were. Car critics & dealers. While their input is useful, it also , like so many things in life, has to be taken in moderation. G.M. should have been balancing what they were saying with looking at the sales numbers & seen what was actually SELLING! They would've noticed a lot of plastic cladded vehicles selling awfully well in spite of the onerous cladding. Then maybe they might've been smart enough to say "If it aint broke, don't fix it!".
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:08 PM
  #44  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by rlchv70
Pontiac 5-7 years ago was panned for the plastic body cladding and for the Aztec. In order to fix that, they dropped both. They also dropped the Sunfire. The dealers cried foul and we got the G3 and G5. Today's Pontiac is what it is because that is what the "people" wanted.
This is my own personal opinion, but some of the concerns that befell Pontiac was that many of the dealers insisted on having Chevrolet product along with what was offered as an exclusive.

Offering a Pontiac version could often increase engineering expense to the Chevy version as the Pontiac version could not shoulder the costs alone.
Old Jul 10, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #45  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Maximum Bob
Yes, but look at who the "people" were. Car critics & dealers. While their input is useful, it also , like so many things in life, has to be taken in moderation. G.M. should have been balancing what they were saying with looking at the sales numbers & seen what was actually SELLING! They would've noticed a lot of plastic cladded vehicles selling awfully well in spite of the onerous cladding. Then maybe they might've been smart enough to say "If it aint broke, don't fix it!".
There was a place and time where all GM divisions were clammoring for cladding in styling statements for what they were trying to sell.

The Aztek and Avalanche answered many questions as to whether cladding was over as a must have on the exterior.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 AM.