Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

GM, Chrysler agree to reconsider dealer closings

Old Dec 3, 2009 | 06:33 PM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
GM, Chrysler agree to reconsider dealer closings

All of the dealerships around here have already shut down & the lots are vacant....I'm shocked there are still some opened that were slated to close. They haven't been able to order new inventory have they?


WASHINGTON (AP) -- General Motors Co. and Chrysler will reconsider decisions to close thousands of dealerships as part of a compromise meant to stave off federal legislation that would require them to keep the showrooms open.

The decision by the two automakers, announced Thursday, raises the prospect of new life for some of the more than 3,000 dealerships that were slated to close as part of the broad auto industry restructuring. Dealers have loudly protested the decisions, and some said Thursday that the policy is merely an attempt by the automakers to placate Congress.

Just how many dealers could potentially be allowed to stay open remains unclear. The companies did not provide any estimates. Dealers involved in talks this fall with the automakers said likely only a handful of lots targeted for closure would survive, despite the new policy.

The plans of GM, based in Detroit, and Chrysler Group LLC call for face-to-face reviews with dealerships and binding arbitration for those who challenge closure of their showrooms. Chrysler said its review process would start Thursday while GM said talks with dealers would begin in mid-January.

Chrysler, based in Auburn Hills, Mich., said dealers will be given a chance to open new showrooms if an arbitration panel rules in their favor.

Dealer groups and a key lawmaker questioned the automakers' latest plans, however, opening the possibility of Congress considering the dealer legislation anyway. The National Automobile Dealers Association said the GM proposal was a "positive step" but did not create "a sufficiently meaningful process that provides for a reasonable opportunity for dealer reinstatement."

Rep. Christopher Van Hollen, D-Md., who has criticized the dealer cuts, said the GM and Chrysler plans "still fall short of what is needed to help reinstate profitable car dealers and put their employees back to work."

GM, the largest U.S. automaker, said it would be more transparent about how it picked the dealers that will be closed. It will speed up payments to assist closed dealers, whose staff will need job retraining.

As part of its deep restructuring this year, GM has said it will cut 2,400 dealers from its 6,000-dealer network by next fall. Chrysler announced similar plans, slashing 789 dealers as part of its restructuring this summer. Both automakers say the cuts are needed to better align their dealer network with much lower demand for cars and trucks.

But dealers have accused the automakers of closing lots that were still profitable, and said the auto companies weren't forthcoming about the criteria they used to decide who will close and who stay open.

The House passed legislation in July that would force the companies to reverse their closure plans, though the Senate has not taken it up. The Obama administration opposes the measure. The federal government holds a majority stake in GM and 10 percent in Chrysler.

Talks brokered by Congress between the dealer groups and the automakers began in September, but had stalled over disagreements over factors like the review process for dealers slated to close.

GM's vice president of U.S. sales, Susan Docherty, said in GM's statement Thursday that the company appreciated the efforts of Congressional leaders to reach a "non-legislative resolution to address dealer concerns that were critical to the development of GM's comprehensive plan."

But dealers who took part in talks said the automakers broke off negotiations and made the announcement on their own.

Tammy Darvish of the Washington-area Darcars chain, which has three dealerships slated for closure, said at most, only about 50 dealers would have their decisions reversed.

"Both of their plans are a sham," she said.

GM spokesman Greg Martin said the company released its proposal "because at some point you have to move forward." He would not speculate on how many dealer closures would ultimately be reversed.

Lawmakers have warned that if an agreement isn't reached, legislation would move forward to deal with the closures. Most of the Senate Commerce Committee wrote a letter two weeks ago to Chrysler and GM seeking more information about the talks and warning that dealers should be treated fairly.

Legislation appears to still be a possibility. A spokeswoman for House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., who helped set up the talks, said that GM and Chrysler must give dealers broad leeway to prove that their franchises should remain open.

Congressional leaders involved in the negotiations, including Hoyer, D-Md. and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the Senate majority whip.

Dave Jackson, whose GM franchise agreements are set to expire next August, has already closed his dealership in Three Forks, Mont., and is weighing what to do with the dealership he owns 50 miles away in Livingston, Mont. He has already laid off 26 of 32 employees and sold his new car inventory. But he said he would consider appealing GM's decision.

"If General Motors allows me to, we may be able to stay open," he said.

AP Business Writers Dee-Ann Durbin and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this story.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/GM-Chr...&asset=&ccode=
Old Dec 3, 2009 | 09:00 PM
  #2  
Josh452's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,496
From: Roseville, MI, USA
Dumb...Dumb...Dumb - you can't "undo" what you did in a bankruptcy court.

The dealers were named as debtors who wouldn't accept a package by GM and Treasury to save the company from bankruptcy - just like creditors wouldn't.

Who got screwed? The only 2 of the 3 that made changes to save the company money will be the UAW.

The dealers gambled and it looks like they are going to be successful in not sacrificing a single thing. This is not something that's good.

They should not give in to what they got in bankruptcy court. Let a politician pass a law...it won't mean much. It's already been decided on in a court of LAW called bankruptcy.

The Government does not want to get involved in the business of over-ruling what a bankruptcy judge says.....and they won't do it if GM sticks to their bankruptcy agreements with dealers.
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #3  
Bearcat Steve's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 210
From: Cincinnati, OH
I thought the "guvmint" wasn't going to get involved in day-to-day opps.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 08:43 AM
  #4  
1fastdog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,808
From: FL/MI
Originally Posted by Bearcat Steve
I thought the "guvmint" wasn't going to get involved in day-to-day opps.
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 01:07 PM
  #5  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Lawmakers agree on arbitration plan for rejected dealers

WASHINGTON -- House and Senate leaders agreed to a legislative proposal to give rejected General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group dealers access to third-party arbitration under criteria broader than that planned by the automakers.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., and Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin, D-Ill, said late Tuesday that the bill would require arbitrators to balance the economic interests of dealers, the companies and the public.

Dealers who appeal their termination and win in arbitration would receive a letter of reinstatement from GM or Chrysler within seven business days of the arbitrator’s decision, the joint statement said.

The bill -- whose enactment is now virtually assured -- is to be attached to a financial services spending measure and considered by a conference committee of congressional leaders this week. It then will be submitted for final votes by the House and Senate before going to the White House for President Barack Obama’s signature.

The agreement was praised by the National Automobile Dealers Association and the Committee to Restore Dealer Rights, a rejected-dealer group that had pushed most aggressively for dealer reinstatement.

The bill “establishes a fair, neutral, transparent and balanced arbitration procedure for all dealers who lost their franchises this year,” Committee leader Tamara Darvish said.

NADA said in its statement that the bill would “provide a fair process to address dealer concerns about the recent closure of General Motors and Chrysler dealerships.”

GM and Chrysler last week broke off settlement talks aimed at avoiding legislation and announced plans to give rejected dealers access to third-party arbitration.

Arbitrators under the automakers’ plans were to apply the original criteria used by the companies in marking them for termination.

Dealer groups said few dealerships would be restored under these criteria because they were circular and self-fulfilling.

Chrysler was to start implementing its plan this week, and GM next month.

http://www.autonews.com/article/2009...912099996/1078
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 07:39 PM
  #6  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
**** the dealers. They were closed for a reason.
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #7  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Obama's signature kicks off arbitration process for rejected GM, Chrysler dealers

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama signed legislation that would give rejected General Motors Co. and Chrysler Group dealers access to neutral arbitration if they want to be reinstated, kicking off a a six-and-a-half months arbitration process.

GM and Chrysler now have 30 days to send letters to the owners of about 2,150 rejected dealerships informing them of their rights under the new law and spelling out the reasons that their franchise agreements were terminated.

With Obama's signature, the eliminated dealerships have 40 days to give notice that they intend to seek arbitration.

Arbitration must be completed within six months, and dealerships that win must receive a letter of intent from the automakers within another 14 business days.
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #8  
DvBoard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 940
From: Southern Indiana
What the hell? Save the company, but then reattach the anchor that was weighing them down?
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
Aaron91RS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 162
From: St. Louis, MO
It's too late for most of them.
It will be interesting to see both sides if some do go in to arbitration with a neutral 3rd party.
We'll finally get to hear justification from both sides instead of the 'cause I said so' stuff.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93 RedBird
Fuel and Ignition
4
Nov 15, 2015 08:24 AM
9t4lt4z28
LT1 Based Engine Tech
1
Oct 2, 2015 10:28 AM
Ericksd
Drivetrain
2
Sep 16, 2015 07:08 PM
tommalcolm
Computer Diagnostics and Tuning
2
Sep 11, 2015 03:39 PM
Toxintwins
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
1
Sep 11, 2015 11:13 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.