Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

The Future....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 01:16 PM
  #1  
2001Firehawk's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 284
From: Pa
The Future....

video.... of race...and one ugly little car...

http://jalopnik.com/5101963/tesla-sc...-car-drag-race

In what may be the first ever drag race between production electric cars, the geeky Tango electric cruiser edged out the trendy Tesla Roadster electric sports car. How fast were these electron-fueled warriors going when they crossed the finish line?

According to the person who posted the video, the Tango crossed the quarter mile in 14.48 seconds at a speed of 92.15 mph, besting the Tesla's 14.666 seconds at 101.23 miles.

On Nov 30th, the fastest production electric vehicles in the U.S. went head-to-head. While their first meeting had a number of issues, most notably the underfilled Tango battery pack, and the Tesla's non-upgraded drivetrain, the 1/4 mile time is quite close and indicative of races to come.

In this race, the Tango got 92.15mph in 14.480 seconds, beating its 14.7 "dial" handicap and thus losing the competition; the Tesla got 101.23mph in 14.666 seconds, slower than its 14.5 "dial" handicap and allowing it to proceed to the next round. (Two rounds later, the Tango's driver got behind the wheel of the Tesla and also beat its "dial" handicap... and thus lost!)
Old Dec 4, 2008 | 08:31 PM
  #2  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
one is a 1 seater?? but that thing looked funny taking off.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:41 AM
  #3  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Ooooh, 14 second cars.

I used to know a guy (haven't seen him since college) that worked for GM Ovonic, the company that was responsible for the battery in the Saturn EV1.

Apparently, they had prototype vehicles running the quarter mile in the 11-12 second range, although I'm sure their other attributes were not viable for a car to be sold to the public.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 08:53 AM
  #4  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
I'd like to see the Dodge EV thrown in.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #5  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Electric is not the future

I realize that almost all the vehicle manufacturers are rushing to get an electric vehicle to market…that it’s the “in” thing to be doing now; but if you are really looking toward the future; I don’t see electric vehicles ever being much more than a vehicle for daily commuting/grocery getters; and a fairly expensive option for those uses (even with mass production).

Looking back at the history of the automobile, it’s represented, especially in the U.S., far, far more than just transportation to/from work or running around town…it’s represented true freedom to travel almost anywhere…obviously; part of that is the distribution network of fuel.

In the desire to remove the U.S. from dependence on foreign sources of energy (i.e. crude oil), our one best domestic source of energy is natural gas…T. Boone Pickens has it right on this one.

Starting with commercial uses and then private sector, CNG is likely our best source of a extremely abundant and relatively inexpensive (compared to gasoline) source of energy and more importantly, it really doesn’t require a lot of changes for the automotive industry – most engines in every car on the road today could be converted to run on CNG and it wouldn’t take a lot of R&D to make an IC engine perform even better on CNG than a engine can on gasoline.

The only real drawback with CNG at the moment is a lack of refueling stations but that can be easily solved; much more easily solved, most likely, than building infrastructure for other substitutes.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 02:03 PM
  #6  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Robert_Nashville
I realize that almost all the vehicle manufacturers are rushing to get an electric vehicle to market…that it’s the “in” thing to be doing now; but if you are really looking toward the future; I don’t see electric vehicles ever being much more than a vehicle for daily commuting/grocery getters; and a fairly expensive option for those uses (even with mass production).

Looking back at the history of the automobile, it’s represented, especially in the U.S., far, far more than just transportation to/from work or running around town…it’s represented true freedom to travel almost anywhere…obviously; part of that is the distribution network of fuel.

In the desire to remove the U.S. from dependence on foreign sources of energy (i.e. crude oil), our one best domestic source of energy is natural gas…T. Boone Pickens has it right on this one.

Starting with commercial uses and then private sector, CNG is likely our best source of a extremely abundant and relatively inexpensive (compared to gasoline) source of energy and more importantly, it really doesn’t require a lot of changes for the automotive industry – most engines in every car on the road today could be converted to run on CNG and it wouldn’t take a lot of R&D to make an IC engine perform even better on CNG than a engine can on gasoline.

The only real drawback with CNG at the moment is a lack of refueling stations but that can be easily solved; much more easily solved, most likely, than building infrastructure for other substitutes.
The smart thing to do would be too keep Natural Gas as a home heating and industrial feedstock only. Keep it as far away as possible transportation as possible.

US gas production peak in the 70's and is on a slow decline. We move vehicles to CNG and in 5-10 years we will be no better off than we are today with oil.

If we truly do care about energy independence we will move toward electrified rail to replace trucking and electrify cars (start with plug in hybrids) as soon as we can. Building the grid to handle this needs to start now while we still have the means.




Last edited by Z28x; Dec 8, 2008 at 02:07 PM.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 02:42 PM
  #7  
Robert_Nashville's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,938
Originally Posted by Z28x
The smart thing to do would be too keep Natural Gas as a home heating and industrial feedstock only. Keep it as far away as possible transportation as possible.

US gas production peak in the 70's and is on a slow decline. We move vehicles to CNG and in 5-10 years we will be no better off than we are today with oil.

If we truly do care about energy independence we will move toward electrified rail to replace trucking and electrify cars (start with plug in hybrids) as soon as we can. Building the grid to handle this needs to start now while we still have the means.
I think you may be confusing production with resources...I've heard estimates that known reserves could serve the U.S.' current transportation needs for at least a century.

Also, doing "one" doesn't mean we have to "not do" the other...we need to be doing a lot of different things (so long as they make economic sense).
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 02:56 PM
  #8  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
Diversity in the energy supply is the answer - though I am huge fan of gaseous fuels.

Never again should we allow ourselves to be beholden to any single source.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #9  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Caps94ZODG
one is a 1 seater?? but that thing looked funny taking off.
Actually its a two-seater. The passenger sits behind the driver like in a jet airplane.
Old Dec 8, 2008 | 07:37 PM
  #10  
Kevin Blown 95 TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,684
Some of the comments were funny:

"We can collide some pop culture here.

Old guy:
"Boy, that's one fast phone booth."

Young guy: "What's a phone booth?"
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
JakeRobb's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 9,507
From: Okemos, MI
Originally Posted by jg95z28
The passenger sits behind the driver like in a jet airplane.


I'm assuming you mean like a fighter jet...
Old Dec 9, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #12  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by JakeRobb


I'm assuming you mean like a fighter jet...
Yes. That is what I meant.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CustomSSI
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
2
Mar 25, 2006 08:28 PM
JeremyKweens
LT1 Based Engine Tech
8
Apr 20, 2005 08:33 AM
12secondv6
Middle Atlantic
11
Nov 8, 2004 02:19 PM
ZeeDub
LT1 Based Engine Tech
0
Sep 15, 2004 02:01 AM
Aeromaks
LT1 Based Engine Tech
7
Nov 18, 2003 01:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.