Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 05:46 PM
  #16  
Kris93/95Z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,449
From: Bentonville, AR
Thumbs up Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
For all Ford did, they could've done better. JMHO though.
I guess they could be doing the job GM is doing to get us a car? You know the car we won't be able to own for upwards of 3 years by most speculation.

I am not a Ford fanboy, and have never owned a Ford. But, I will give a to Ford for having the ***** to be out there making cars like this.
Old Jun 23, 2006 | 11:20 PM
  #17  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
...And this is what scares me about the talk of Chevy already developing a supercharged V8 for the Camaro.

I'll give Ford the credit for having the cajones to drop such a monster motor into the Mustang, but I am left unimpressed with the engineering behind the GT500. Quite honestly, the '03-'04 Cobra was a more impressive piece....even though it's a few ticks slower....
Flexi-flopper chassis with a **** poor IRS is impressive?
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 02:11 AM
  #18  
grossesexy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 483
From: Far, far away
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Am I the only one who sees the cyclical way the mustang is progressing? Look back at how the mustang started and how things went, and look at what is happening now.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #19  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

You mean small light car with small V8 grows into a fairly big car with large V8 (64 to 73) then shrinks to a small light car with a small V8 grows into a fairly big car with a slightly bigger V8? (74 to 07)?
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 09:22 AM
  #20  
Good Ph.D's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,597
From: Mack and Bewick
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Kris93/95Z28
You guys crack me up YES, The car is heavy... GET OVER IT. The damn thing runs low 12s out of the box with a good driver. Think about how mean these things are going to be when someone slaps on some drag radials, a pulley and gets a tune

Give Ford some friggin' well deserved credit.
For what? They killed SVT, killed the LS and are finding progressively more boring cars to put an oval, wing and crosshair on.

Mustang is the only car they have that isn't an also ran, so yes they are trying to make it everything to everyone. See the eleventy billion SE models.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 09:30 AM
  #21  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Gloveperson
I noticed the numbers are uncorrected; were his other test also uncorrected as well (say the 12.43 of the Cobra and the 12.9 of the LS1)
No. They always report actual ET/MPH (as they should, IMHO).

Bob

PS....there certainly are some sour grapes on this Forum.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #22  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Gloveperson
Wow! So, at E-town I could easily see that trap going up another .5 or so!
LOL. Cute. Perhaps another 1-2 mph, and another .1-.3 in ET. I'll stick by my original prediction that someone will run 11.9x with a stone stock car (putting in right around stock C5 Z06 territory....in a straight line, of course). Whether that lives up to the "obscene expectations" that it had, I couldn't tell you. I like the car, but I won't buy one, mainly because of its tonnage (and to some extent, the price).

Seriously. Do you think it has something to do with that the car is not living up the obscene expectations that it had?
Seriously. I think it has to do with a number of things. But mostly, I just think there is.

Bob
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #23  
grossesexy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 483
From: Far, far away
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by bossco
You mean small light car with small V8 grows into a fairly big car with large V8 (64 to 73) then shrinks to a small light car with a small V8 grows into a fairly big car with a slightly bigger V8? (74 to 07)?
Yeeeep, that is exactly what I'm talking about although your years are kind of off at the start.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 12:19 PM
  #24  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Good Ph.D
For what? They killed SVT, killed the LS and are finding progressively more boring cars to put an oval, wing and crosshair on.

Mustang is the only car they have that isn't an also ran, so yes they are trying to make it everything to everyone. See the eleventy billion SE models.
Exactly how I feel about Ford. I don't really want to hate Ford. They used to make a lot of interesting stuff. There is just almost nothing in the present day that interests me all about Ford. Besides the Mustang, that seem to have decided to follow the Toyota example of product.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #25  
RussStang's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Exton, Pennsylvania
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by bossco
Flexi-flopper chassis with a **** poor IRS is impressive?
I thought it was. People can talk trash on the chassis all they went. The Terminators were nice cars, and when they came out they offered a hell of a lot of power, for a relatively low price. There was also much potential in the car. It was quite a nice piece.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #26  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Gloveperson
The ET will probably drop once they get the 60 footer down; which seems to have been done by 5.0 Mustang. 1-2 MPH is more than I think will go down by, but perhaps you are correct (you have more drag racing experience than I do).
I haven't seen anything from 5.0. What did they do with it?

I do believe 1-2 mph is quite possible, assuming it is done in really cool weather on a good track. "Pedaling" a car in any gear will hurt both MPH and ET. The real question is how much did he really have to "pedal" it. I don't know. We'll just have to wait and see.

Bob
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 01:33 PM
  #27  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Not saying Evan Smith isnt a badass (although id love to challenge him to any driving contest), I went a 12.3 with 361 wheel hp (mustang dyno).

I had a lil better 60' though, lol.

If that 60' is legit and he really was peddling the car (and aparently was with that short time), the car should get .2 faster easy but with the same MPH.
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #28  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by bossco
Flexi-flopper chassis with a **** poor IRS is impressive?
Well, the fact that they could run as much power as they could through that flexi-flopper chassis and cobbled-together IRS was pretty impressive honestly, yes. Sure, the "LS Mustang" is structurally more solid, at a good weight penalty. The '03 Cobra was also working with a smaller motor (though not that important in the grand scheme of things I suppose...)
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 01:38 PM
  #29  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
PS....there certainly are some sour grapes on this Forum.
Bob, as I pointed out in the link I posted, there are a decent number of Mustang guys who are disappointed in the time as well.

Perhaps expectations for this car were too great...especially with Shelby's name on it....

Where the 2003 Cobra was a quantum leap forward in Mustang performance (considering the smack-down the LSx engines were giving Ford), this seems more like an incremental improvement....
Old Jun 24, 2006 | 06:46 PM
  #30  
bossco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,977
From: SeVa
Re: Evan Smith goes 12.25 in the GT500.

Originally Posted by RussStang
I thought it was. People can talk trash on the chassis all they went. The Terminators were nice cars, and when they came out they offered a hell of a lot of power, for a relatively low price. There was also much potential in the car. It was quite a nice piece.
It is what it is, methinks the SN95 chassis (IIRC) was some 40% stiffer than the old Fox bod chassis and the IRS was the best they could do given the limitations of the platform (however I suppose anything was better than the deathwish 4 link underpinning the live axle cars) what the SN95/Foxbody cars proved was anything can be made to handle with a set of high performance tires.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:03 AM.