Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Edmunds Test Drive - Nissan GT-R

Old May 9, 2008 | 10:42 AM
  #16  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
But the GT-R has back seats.

The fact that excites me is that Nissan can get that performance with a twin-turbo V6. It shows promise for our future that gas prices may not kill performance cars, they just may evolve from the traditional NA V8s we've had up to now.
Old May 9, 2008 | 10:51 AM
  #17  
blackrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 587
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by jg95z28
It shows promise for our future that gas prices may not kill performance cars, they just may evolve from the traditional NA V8s we've had up to now.



The Zo6 gets better gas mileage.

Not that it really matters, you don't buy a car like that with mpg in mind.
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #18  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by blackrat


The Zo6 gets better gas mileage.
I realize that.
Originally Posted by blackrat
Not that it really matters, you don't buy a car like that with mpg in mind.
Agreed, but it shows the potential of getting V8 level performance with smaller engines.

With GM getting over 100hp/liter out of the Ecotecs, I really think smaller higher performance engines are the answer to CAFE... and that may include a smaller, lighter and higher reving V8. (Say 4.0L for example?)

Just thinking outside the box.
Old May 9, 2008 | 12:05 PM
  #19  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by jg95z28
But the GT-R has back seats.

The fact that excites me is that Nissan can get that performance with a twin-turbo V6. It shows promise for our future that gas prices may not kill performance cars, they just may evolve from the traditional NA V8s we've had up to now.
Sadly, all of Nissan's wunder-tech yields little real MPG benefits. In real-world test driving, one of the major mags recently got a dismal 10 (yes, TEN) MPG in the GT-R.

Couple that with the likely ownership nightmares of all this complexity. Only half of Nissan dealers are certified to service these cars (care to speculate, how many of that fraction will actually be good at working on them?). Just changing the OIL, requires removal of a aero-shroud body pan. Nissan has already made clear, the GT-R PCM has unprecedented new levels of anti-tampering protection... no doubt to help contain warranty costs, but also no doubt because tweaking all that complexity will be near-impossible. Want custom wheels? Forget it. Want a PCM tune? Forget it. Want to fling the car around a curve in a fun power-slide? No-no. No Thanks.
Old May 9, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #20  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
I would just buy a Z06 and a GT-R.

Old May 9, 2008 | 12:22 PM
  #21  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by BigDarknFast
Sadly, all of Nissan's wunder-tech yields little real MPG benefits. In real-world test driving, one of the major mags recently got a dismal 10 (yes, TEN) MPG in the GT-R.
Nissans have never been known as fuel miserly vehicles. I wouldn't expect the GT-R to change that.
Old May 9, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #22  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
I would just buy a Z06 and a GT-R.

After your student loans are satisfied I presume...
Old May 9, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #23  
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 574
From: Richmond, TX
the GT-R has a combination of things that make it the premier supercar value.

1) turbos - a tune and exhaust SHOULD turn this into a 10 sec at 130+ car
2) the ultimate handling
3) 4 seats
4) Exotic looks. sorry but the Z06 still just looks like any other $45K vette
5) price - 1 year from now these will be available under sticker.


Again, the potential of the turbo 3.8 V6 reminds me of the insane performance from another 3.8 turbo V6 a little over 20 years ago.

The GT500 is similar. Underwhelming numbers stock. But turn up the boost and it outpowers everything in the 1/4.
Old May 9, 2008 | 05:35 PM
  #24  
BigDarknFast's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,139
From: Commerce, mi, USA
Originally Posted by jg95z28
Nissans have never been known as fuel miserly vehicles. I wouldn't expect the GT-R to change that.
Actually - it has little to do with Nissan's fuel economy reputation. It has everything to do with porky curb weight, lossy AWD, and the simple physics of putting out 480 *under-rated* HP. My point being, there are lots better ways to confront our supposed "oil shortage" than by making sports cars like the GT-R.
Old May 9, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #25  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
It is indeed porky.

/me saves this post for future reference.
Old May 9, 2008 | 09:23 PM
  #26  
notgetleft's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 808
From: manassas, VA
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
t4) Exotic looks. sorry but the Z06 still just looks like any other $45K vette
Originally Posted by Slappy3243
They're also more luxurious, more livable and far more impressive to members of the opposite sex, most of whom would see the GT-R and wonder why you put that big ugly wing on your 300ZX.
Looks are definitely subjective, but i have to agree with that part of the article there. The GTR doesn't look exotic AT ALL to me, it looks like any other nissan Z car with a boy racer bodykit on it.

The Z06 might look like just another vette, but the vette is a DAMN nice looking car to start. And speaking of exotic looks, i've personally witnessed a couple people do double takes of a C6 in traffic and say wait, is that a ferrari. No way you mistake a GTR for any >100k car.

Last edited by notgetleft; May 9, 2008 at 09:26 PM.
Old May 9, 2008 | 11:03 PM
  #27  
SSbaby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,123
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by jg95z28
But the GT-R has back seats.

The fact that excites me is that Nissan can get that performance with a twin-turbo V6. It shows promise for our future that gas prices may not kill performance cars, they just may evolve from the traditional NA V8s we've had up to now.
As an all out sports car, these points are irrelevant, IMO.

Turbos generally use more fuel than NA as they run richer.

But who cares about fuel when you could have the ultimate performance car for $76 large? The car is a purpose built weapon and all the arguments leveled against the GTR are somewhat unfair (except the looks comments which is always subjective). The weight issue is moot given it runs AWD. Without AWD it wouldn't be the beast that it is.

Having said that, the Z06 is all about raw performance in the purest sense, which has its core fans... as well as detractors.
Old May 10, 2008 | 01:37 AM
  #28  
grossesexy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 483
From: Far, far away
Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
the GT-R has a combination of things that make it the premier supercar value.

1) turbos - a tune and exhaust SHOULD turn this into a 10 sec at 130+ car

Again, the potential of the turbo 3.8 V6 reminds me of the insane performance from another 3.8 turbo V6 a little over 20 years ago.

The GT500 is similar. Underwhelming numbers stock. But turn up the boost and it outpowers everything in the 1/4.

Haven't read much about the controls on the car have you? Good luck tuning the car.
Old May 10, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #29  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by SSbaby
The weight issue is moot given it runs AWD. Without AWD it wouldn't be the beast that it is.
Weight is never "moot". At least not from an enthusiast POV. Yes, the handling is OUTSTANDING. The braking is phenomenal. The acceleration is excellent. But it would handle better, brake faster, and accelerate harder if it weighed 100 lbs less. Or 200 lbs. Or [insert number here] less.

Weight is never "moot". At least not to an enthusiast.
Old May 10, 2008 | 12:18 PM
  #30  
soul strife's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 824
From: North of Cincy
Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
I would just buy a Z06 and a Turbo kit.

Fixed

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.