DROVE the GTO at Milford
Registered User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 358
From: AU
i think that redzed is butt hurt, because he was under the false impession that his car was the last performace car gm was ever going to build for a long time and that its resale value in the following years would skyrocket...
if we go way way back to one of his early posts, you can clearly see why a new GTO (so soon) after the discontinuation of his f-body, threatens what he would have liked to happen.
this first post could possibly reveal redzed's hatred towards the GTO - http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...&threadid=7373
if we go way way back to one of his early posts, you can clearly see why a new GTO (so soon) after the discontinuation of his f-body, threatens what he would have liked to happen.
this first post could possibly reveal redzed's hatred towards the GTO - http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...&threadid=7373
Registered User
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Re: Re: Re: Re: DROVE the GTO at Milford
Originally posted by redzed
1. The Malibu is smaller than the Camry. (Less car)
2. The Malibu is lighter than the Camry. (Less car)
3. The Malibu most probably won't have the reliability record of a Camry. (Flying pig alert?)
1. The Malibu is smaller than the Camry. (Less car)
2. The Malibu is lighter than the Camry. (Less car)
3. The Malibu most probably won't have the reliability record of a Camry. (Flying pig alert?)
2) throw some weights in the trunk
3)Didn't the OLD Malibu beat the Camary in the last reliability servay by JD power.
Camary is no better looking than the Malibu, both are plain.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post