Corvette Forum member snaps ACTUAL, finished C6 pictures... in Dark Red...
Originally posted by unvc92camarors
question: someone on the vette forum said that the c5 had to go on a diet, but yet they made the rear glass extend almost all the way towards the bumper making it weigh more
now i kno the transition from f3-f4 they made the hatch glass shorter and less area to make it lighter. wouldnt making the glass longer defeat the purpose of making it lighter? unless they made some definite weight savings somewhere else (exposed headlights, etc.)
just a thought
question: someone on the vette forum said that the c5 had to go on a diet, but yet they made the rear glass extend almost all the way towards the bumper making it weigh more
now i kno the transition from f3-f4 they made the hatch glass shorter and less area to make it lighter. wouldnt making the glass longer defeat the purpose of making it lighter? unless they made some definite weight savings somewhere else (exposed headlights, etc.)
just a thought
What's the commotion about? It's just a freshened C5 from those shots.
Because of that it's still very nice but now it doesn't blow me away either. Hopefully the front end looks better than the "Boat Shop" pictures though....
Because of that it's still very nice but now it doesn't blow me away either. Hopefully the front end looks better than the "Boat Shop" pictures though....
If that is a C6.............what exactly does it have over a C5?
I still don't think that this "new" Vette should be called a C6........rather it should be a mild body change of a C5.
To me, the changes I've seen are similar to the changes that the 4th gen Camaro did from 97 to 98........
Still a 4th gen. Even though it has a fish face.
I still don't think that this "new" Vette should be called a C6........rather it should be a mild body change of a C5.
To me, the changes I've seen are similar to the changes that the 4th gen Camaro did from 97 to 98........

Still a 4th gen. Even though it has a fish face.
Originally posted by redzed
The rear is pure '68-73 C3 - or maybe '84-90 C4. There is way more C3 in the sideprofile, but the windshield/firewall area looks like a C5 carry over.
And that front end looks hideous, at least from what I see. I suspect that the profit motivation killed the trademark concealed headlights. I would like to personally thank GM for killing a styling feature that has been around since 1963!
I always wanted the Vette to look more like a Mitsubishi Eclipse.
The rear is pure '68-73 C3 - or maybe '84-90 C4. There is way more C3 in the sideprofile, but the windshield/firewall area looks like a C5 carry over.
And that front end looks hideous, at least from what I see. I suspect that the profit motivation killed the trademark concealed headlights. I would like to personally thank GM for killing a styling feature that has been around since 1963!
I always wanted the Vette to look more like a Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Maybe they are just changing things up a bit? The C3s looked basically nothing like C2s, but still related through the fenders/quarter panels. C4s looked drastically different from C3s, but still related. And so on. I can't believe how much the freaking headlights are hanging some of you up. Ferraris and Lambos used to be pop up headlights; now they are fixed projector type or whatever. Hell, the Diablo changed to fixed headlights as a mid cycle change, and actually used the headlights from the old 300ZX, I believe.
Pop up headlights are sort of out of style, anyway. Does anyone still use them?
Originally posted by unvc92camarors
i like it so far, looks like it sits lower (just looks like it from the profyle although it's probably close to he same) and the profyle shot is nice. deciding factor is the headlights though
o, and the rear doesnt look too bad either
i like it so far, looks like it sits lower (just looks like it from the profyle although it's probably close to he same) and the profyle shot is nice. deciding factor is the headlights though
o, and the rear doesnt look too bad either
Originally posted by guionM
I know exactly where that is, Financial District of San Francisco. They were taking promotional press shots of the car.
Both San Francisco and San Diego are favorite places for these, and I guess it's that season again.
This week's starting off with a BANG, isn't it!
I know exactly where that is, Financial District of San Francisco. They were taking promotional press shots of the car.
Both San Francisco and San Diego are favorite places for these, and I guess it's that season again.
This week's starting off with a BANG, isn't it!
looks pretty good, but too much C4 at the rear for my liking. still wouldn't think twice about getting one if i could afford it though.
I was disappointed with the nose last week when the boat shop pics surfaced, but these photos have me singing a different tune.
I knew the nose looked familiar...its the Stingray III/California Corvette, a 13 yr old concept.
http://www.corvette.nl/specials/stingray3.html
I knew the nose looked familiar...its the Stingray III/California Corvette, a 13 yr old concept.
http://www.corvette.nl/specials/stingray3.html
Last edited by Chris 96 WS6; Nov 17, 2003 at 02:46 PM.
Originally posted by JEDCamino
I'm surprised that so many see little difference between this and the C5. It looks considerably different to me, and we haven't even seen the finished front yet.
I'm surprised that so many see little difference between this and the C5. It looks considerably different to me, and we haven't even seen the finished front yet.
I must say, I instantly like this car more than the C5. I thought the C5 styling was nothing more than a C4 run through a wind tunnel. But this car has spunk, it doesn't look to be as much of a compromise as the C5 did, to me anyway. It's kind of funny, I was a fan of the C4, and when the C5 came out, I didn't really care for the jellybean design. But now, this C6 has almost gone the way of a retro C4 in alot of ways, and thats great for me! Also, I LOVE the fender flares off the C3, also one of my favorite gens. The double tipped exhaust as opposed to the quad looks good IMO, and the round tail lights are a welcome sight too. And the wheels are a VAST improvement over the first C5 wheels.
I felt a little better about the open grille when I realized that all the C2 Stingrays had a single big grille, that ties this car into Corvette tradition for me a little bit more. I look forward to seeing a full frontal of this car, to give a final grade to the front end, but from what I've seen, I am very happy and very relieved at the same time, after the almost disappointment I felt when I first saw the C5.
Good Job GM!
I felt a little better about the open grille when I realized that all the C2 Stingrays had a single big grille, that ties this car into Corvette tradition for me a little bit more. I look forward to seeing a full frontal of this car, to give a final grade to the front end, but from what I've seen, I am very happy and very relieved at the same time, after the almost disappointment I felt when I first saw the C5.
Good Job GM!
I'm lookin' at that red C6 and I'm sayin' to myself "I've seen that same rough design somewhere. But where?"
And then it hit me.
All Corvettes Are Red.
John Cafaro's black car.
Look in the book. In the middle. Right after page 128. There's a color section filled with pics. On the top of the 3rd page, there's a black Corvette concept sitting in front of an F-16.
The C6 has styling and styling elements that are very similar to that concept.
It looks to me like GM used this concept as the basis for the C6, and then refined it to what we see now.
What do ya think?
And then it hit me.
All Corvettes Are Red.
John Cafaro's black car.
Look in the book. In the middle. Right after page 128. There's a color section filled with pics. On the top of the 3rd page, there's a black Corvette concept sitting in front of an F-16.
The C6 has styling and styling elements that are very similar to that concept.
It looks to me like GM used this concept as the basis for the C6, and then refined it to what we see now.
What do ya think?



