Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Consider these Zeta based vehicles

Old Feb 16, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #16  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally posted by Darth Xed
A lot of other things have added weight to the Camaro over the years....

Standard seat belts.
Standard Power steering.
Standard Power brakes.
Standard Air Conditioning.
ABS
ASR
6 disc CD changers
Airbags

The list goes on.
Thats stretching it just a wee bit

Some of you guys are making too much of an issue
And the same can be said of those in favor
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 04:40 PM
  #17  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally posted by 90 Z28SS
A glimpse into the future

"GM pricing set on 2007 camaro Z28 ......$45K with a curb weight of 3850 lbs "

How about we just leave AWD , which has had nothing ever to do with a camaro , to other divisions ......keep the current formula , remember... that rwd affordable 2+2 with great looks and power and just build a better damn car
So then get the sub $30K 3400lbs. RWD Camaro Z28. No one here is saying AWD should be standard equipment on all Camaros.

I'm sure a lot of people would buy a 245HP V6 w/ AWD for $25K, especially here in the North east. Let the market decide, if people don't want AWD they won't buy it. The number 1 reason people tell me they won't buy a Camaro is because it is RWD.
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:10 PM
  #18  
90 Z28SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,801
From: South Bend , IN
Originally posted by Z28x
So then get the sub $30K 3400lbs. RWD Camaro Z28. No one here is saying AWD should be standard equipment on all Camaros.

I'm sure a lot of people would buy a 245HP V6 w/ AWD for $25K, especially here in the North east. Let the market decide, if people don't want AWD they won't buy it. The number 1 reason people tell me they won't buy a Camaro is because it is RWD.
And just having that AWD option is gonna drive the prices higher across the line . The mustang , even in its last days on the fox platform doesnt have any touble consistently selling a 100K + cars a year . Where would a logical argument be that camaro need awd available as an option .

Guess I just agree to disagree ...no biggie .
Old Feb 16, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #19  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally posted by 90 Z28SS
And just having that AWD option is gonna drive the prices higher across the line .
Not necessarilly.

AWD isn't being developed specifically for the Camaro. It is a feature being incorporated into the architecture that we believe the Camaro will use.

The several hundred thousand cars per year, built on this architecture, (including Camaro), will pay for AWD....whether Camaro gets it or not.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #20  
KLee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 370
From: Honolulu, Hi USA
The Camaro needs a LS2 or LS7 with a live rear axle, real dual exhaust and a T-56. Curb weight in the neighborhood of 3300 lbs and 400+ horsepower. All for less than 35K.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 12:52 AM
  #21  
morb|d's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,440
From: five-one-oh/nine-oh-nine
how about the caddy "XTC"? it would be a rave with the younger crowd looking for the smaller brother of the XLR. it would have to be based on Kappa not Zeta though. or they could just skip the foreplay and go straight to naming their cars after frats. how about Kappa Gamma Beta?
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 06:26 AM
  #22  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Originally posted by Z284ever
Not necessarilly.

AWD isn't being developed specifically for the Camaro. It is a feature being incorporated into the architecture that we believe the Camaro will use.

The several hundred thousand cars per year, built on this architecture, (including Camaro), will pay for AWD....whether Camaro gets it or not.

This is the all-important factor.... without it, I would not even propose AWD on a Camaro... but being that it should be readily available in a sort of "plug and play" parts bin thing... Chevy would be foolish to not at least consider it as an option.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 12:36 PM
  #23  
jg95z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Thanks for hijacking my thread guys and turning it into a debate on AWD vs. RWD.
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #24  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Consider these Zeta based vehicles

Originally posted by jg95z28
Instead of an AWD Camaro how about considering this shared body style line-up for Zeta: (Doesn't include utes, elkys, or V6 derivatives in some cases, etc)

Group A - Based on the current Monaro/GTO style
Holden Monaro - V8 RWD
Pontiac GTO - V8 RWD
Buick GS - TurboV6 RWD (exact name TBD)

Group B - Based on a sexier 2+2 Sports Coupe
Chevrolet Camaro - V8 RWD
Holden Torana - V8 RWD?
Cadillac XLZ - V8 AWD (exact name TDB)

Instead of upscaling the Camaro with AWD, keep it a lean and mean RWD car and create an upscale version with AWD in Cadillac's camp.

Thoughts?
Well, you kind of had the whole thing tied in with AWD and RWD to begin with...
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 02:19 PM
  #25  
jg95z28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Re: Re: Consider these Zeta based vehicles

Originally posted by Darth Xed
Well, you kind of had the whole thing tied in with AWD and RWD to begin with...
Not as a CAMARO. But instead as a "what if" a sister car was offered in AWD trim by another GM company, like Cadillac or Buick.

The idea being that AWD is consider by many to be an "upscale" option, and Buick/Cadillac are more traditionally in that ballpark, while Chevrolet is more traditionally the "value" brand.

Specifically, would those people who want AWD accept it on another loaded vehicle if it had a different badge and name, but was essentially the same car with AWD?
Old Feb 17, 2004 | 05:54 PM
  #26  
hp_nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 293
From: Hou,TX
Re: Re: Re: Consider these Zeta based vehicles

Originally posted by jg95z28
Not as a CAMARO. But instead as a "what if" a sister car was offered in AWD trim by another GM company, like Cadillac or Buick.

The idea being that AWD is consider by many to be an "upscale" option, and Buick/Cadillac are more traditionally in that ballpark, while Chevrolet is more traditionally the "value" brand.

Specifically, would those people who want AWD accept it on another loaded vehicle if it had a different badge and name, but was essentially the same car with AWD?


Oh.. well then that would be OK.
Old Feb 18, 2004 | 07:32 AM
  #27  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Re: Re: Re: Consider these Zeta based vehicles

Originally posted by jg95z28
Not as a CAMARO. But instead as a "what if" a sister car was offered in AWD trim by another GM company, like Cadillac or Buick.

The idea being that AWD is consider by many to be an "upscale" option, and Buick/Cadillac are more traditionally in that ballpark, while Chevrolet is more traditionally the "value" brand.

Specifically, would those people who want AWD accept it on another loaded vehicle if it had a different badge and name, but was essentially the same car with AWD?

I've been down that road too.... I suggested that perhaps AWD would be a nic way to differentiate a new Firebird from the new Camaro if they ended up doing a Firebird too...

But, ya, assuming there is no Firebird, it works that way too....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Aug 7, 2015 08:52 AM
Boss002
Autocross and Road Racing Technique
2
Jul 24, 2015 10:47 AM
Xiantyl
LT1 Based Engine Tech
18
Jul 21, 2015 05:42 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
Jul 10, 2015 02:23 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.