Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Thanks to CNN and GMI for the link... http://money.cnn.com/2005/12/12/Auto...cool/index.htm
Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
GM's mass-market brand wants to turn back the clock to the days when exciting design sold cars.
December 13, 2005: 12:34 PM EST
By Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNNMoney.com staff writer
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - There was a time when a big Chevrolet was considered cool. With fins, chrome and lots of style and flash, 1950s models like the Bel Air were made to be noticed.
"Chevrolet used to be the exciting affordable car," said Jim Hall with the automotive marketing consultancy AutoPacific.
Chevrolet is still affordable. But exciting? Not quite.
Today's Chevrolets, even executives at General Motors will admit, do not inspire pounding hearts and raw desire. The brand's most successful products, its SUVs and trucks, dazzle only through sheer size. Even otherwise good cars, like the Impala sedan, have the visual excitement of a decent sport coat.
Now GM is looking back to the 1950s for inspiration as it tries to recover from declining market share and a seemingly unbreakable reliance on cash incentives to sell cars.
Not that future Chevrolets will necessarily sprout tail fins or dozens of pounds of glittering chrome, but they won't look like every other car on the road.
"For a while there I think there was a feeling that people who bought Chevrolets cared about a lot of things but they didn't care a lot about design," said Tom Wilkinson, communications director for GM design.
Eye-catching design has certainly worked for the Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler. Cars like the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum sell well without heavy incentives. Both cars are proportioned to look as if they could have driven straight out of a comic book.
But, those cars are not intended for mass appeal. They are designed for strong appeal among a relative few. The same can be said for GM's Hummer and Cadillac divisions, which have also used a more radical design approach to appeal to those who really want to stand out in a crowd.
But what about a car like the Chevrolet Impala, one of GM's most popular cars? Hundreds of thousands of Impalas are sold every year to consumers and fleet buyers like police departments. Are those buyers likely to want flash and style in their big family car?
"Something that's well designed doesn't have to be radically designed," said Wilkinson.
The change
Expect the change to start in the next couple of years.
While no images of the vehicles have been publicly released yet, a look ahead at upcoming Saturns and a look back at the classic Chevys of the 1950s gives an idea of the sort of thing Wilkinson is talking about. And, some experts say, it's just what Chevrolet needs in an era when building better cars just isn't enough.
Saturn, GM's youngest division, has always been known for a kind and gentle dealership experience with no-haggle pricing. It has never been known for particularly desirable or interesting automobiles.
Saturn's new line-up of cars, beginning with the two-seat roadster called the Sky, followed by the Aura sedan. The Vue SUV will also get a new, futuristic look and Saturn will be introducing a larger crossover SUV as well. Saturns are going to start looking very interesting. Much of the vehicles' design will be shared with GM's European Opel brand. The designs will be edgier and more artful than American buyers are used to seeing from GM.
Chevrolet will get things rolling with its own version of the Aura sedan, said Hall, who was treated to a peek at the new Chevrolet sedan. He called the new Chevrolet design even more striking than the Saturn.
The Saturn Aura shares its engineering underpinnings with the current Chevrolet Malibu. The next generation Malibu will be much more aggressive-looking, said GM's Wilkinson, who allowed that the current Malibu is "kind of blah."
Still, improved appearances won't be enough to succeed. Cars like the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum, rear-wheel-drive cars with extremely powerful optional engines, are also fundamentally different from functionally similar vehicles in their price ranges. Also, from the standpoint of driving dynamics, they perform better than most cars they compete against.
GM's mass-market brand wants to turn back the clock to the days when exciting design sold cars.
December 13, 2005: 12:34 PM EST
By Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNNMoney.com staff writer
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) - There was a time when a big Chevrolet was considered cool. With fins, chrome and lots of style and flash, 1950s models like the Bel Air were made to be noticed.
"Chevrolet used to be the exciting affordable car," said Jim Hall with the automotive marketing consultancy AutoPacific.
Chevrolet is still affordable. But exciting? Not quite.
Today's Chevrolets, even executives at General Motors will admit, do not inspire pounding hearts and raw desire. The brand's most successful products, its SUVs and trucks, dazzle only through sheer size. Even otherwise good cars, like the Impala sedan, have the visual excitement of a decent sport coat.
Now GM is looking back to the 1950s for inspiration as it tries to recover from declining market share and a seemingly unbreakable reliance on cash incentives to sell cars.
Not that future Chevrolets will necessarily sprout tail fins or dozens of pounds of glittering chrome, but they won't look like every other car on the road.
"For a while there I think there was a feeling that people who bought Chevrolets cared about a lot of things but they didn't care a lot about design," said Tom Wilkinson, communications director for GM design.
Eye-catching design has certainly worked for the Chrysler Group of DaimlerChrysler. Cars like the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum sell well without heavy incentives. Both cars are proportioned to look as if they could have driven straight out of a comic book.
But, those cars are not intended for mass appeal. They are designed for strong appeal among a relative few. The same can be said for GM's Hummer and Cadillac divisions, which have also used a more radical design approach to appeal to those who really want to stand out in a crowd.
But what about a car like the Chevrolet Impala, one of GM's most popular cars? Hundreds of thousands of Impalas are sold every year to consumers and fleet buyers like police departments. Are those buyers likely to want flash and style in their big family car?
"Something that's well designed doesn't have to be radically designed," said Wilkinson.
The change
Expect the change to start in the next couple of years.
While no images of the vehicles have been publicly released yet, a look ahead at upcoming Saturns and a look back at the classic Chevys of the 1950s gives an idea of the sort of thing Wilkinson is talking about. And, some experts say, it's just what Chevrolet needs in an era when building better cars just isn't enough.
Saturn, GM's youngest division, has always been known for a kind and gentle dealership experience with no-haggle pricing. It has never been known for particularly desirable or interesting automobiles.
Saturn's new line-up of cars, beginning with the two-seat roadster called the Sky, followed by the Aura sedan. The Vue SUV will also get a new, futuristic look and Saturn will be introducing a larger crossover SUV as well. Saturns are going to start looking very interesting. Much of the vehicles' design will be shared with GM's European Opel brand. The designs will be edgier and more artful than American buyers are used to seeing from GM.
Chevrolet will get things rolling with its own version of the Aura sedan, said Hall, who was treated to a peek at the new Chevrolet sedan. He called the new Chevrolet design even more striking than the Saturn.
The Saturn Aura shares its engineering underpinnings with the current Chevrolet Malibu. The next generation Malibu will be much more aggressive-looking, said GM's Wilkinson, who allowed that the current Malibu is "kind of blah."
Still, improved appearances won't be enough to succeed. Cars like the Chrysler 300 and Dodge Magnum, rear-wheel-drive cars with extremely powerful optional engines, are also fundamentally different from functionally similar vehicles in their price ranges. Also, from the standpoint of driving dynamics, they perform better than most cars they compete against.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
It's about time. Hopefully, they realized that copying the Japanese blandness doesn't work because those cars don't really sell on design, but on reputation, imo.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
When will we get the first peak of the highly hailed new Malibu, we've been hearing about it for a while now. Is it going to be shown at NAIAS next month? or maybe later on at one of the other bigger auto shows in NA.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by 30thZ286speed
When will we get the first peak of the highly hailed new Malibu, we've been hearing about it for a while now. Is it going to be shown at NAIAS next month? or maybe later on at one of the other bigger auto shows in NA.
Also of note is that GM is re-examining platforms to eliminate redundancy, example GM Europe didn't really like Delta and has been using a revised old Astra platform. Delta might die and the Astra program could be re-engineered and replace Delta. I guess we will find out in a few years.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by 91_z28_4me
Malibu next gen was pushed back to ride on Epsilon II it won't be here till at least 2009. It seems as though the RWD cars are being brought out quicker and this is a part of the ramifications.
Also of note is that GM is re-examining platforms to eliminate redundancy, example GM Europe didn't really like Delta and has been using a revised old Astra platform. Delta might die and the Astra program could be re-engineered and replace Delta. I guess we will find out in a few years.
Also of note is that GM is re-examining platforms to eliminate redundancy, example GM Europe didn't really like Delta and has been using a revised old Astra platform. Delta might die and the Astra program could be re-engineered and replace Delta. I guess we will find out in a few years.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
I thought either RP or IREngineer said that the EPII platform didn't get pushed back and it was all hearsay?
It seems that some suppliers were recieving stop work orders and others weren't. I don't know how long it will be before we know what is going on with EPII it seems that it will be a VERY important platform for GM.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
I thought either RP or IREngineer said that the EPII platform didn't get pushed back and it was all hearsay?
The next Malibu redesign can easily wind up on the bigger Espilon 1 from the G6.
The big draw with E2 is it's slightly larger, and it's AWD capable. It's not a new or superior structure that it seems like people are making it out to be.
Next Malibu is scheduled to be bigger.
The RWD Chevy sedan is a big car (Around Charger sized by some accounts).
It's almost as if Malibu is moving up to take another existing car's position.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
My understanding is that the main difference between EPI and EPII is, that EPII is standardized to have the ability to be assembled at any Epsilon plant worldwide.
Also some of the EPI stuff that was cancelled, like AWD will be reconstituted into EPII.
Also some of the EPI stuff that was cancelled, like AWD will be reconstituted into EPII.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by guionM
Europe is still getting Espilon 2.
The next Malibu redesign can easily wind up on the bigger Espilon 1 from the G6.
The big draw with E2 is it's slightly larger, and it's AWD capable. It's not a new or superior structure that it seems like people are making it out to be.
Next Malibu is scheduled to be bigger.
The RWD Chevy sedan is a big car (Around Charger sized by some accounts).
It's almost as if Malibu is moving up to take another existing car's position.
The next Malibu redesign can easily wind up on the bigger Espilon 1 from the G6.
The big draw with E2 is it's slightly larger, and it's AWD capable. It's not a new or superior structure that it seems like people are making it out to be.
Next Malibu is scheduled to be bigger.
The RWD Chevy sedan is a big car (Around Charger sized by some accounts).
It's almost as if Malibu is moving up to take another existing car's position.

Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by guionM
Next Malibu is scheduled to be bigger.
The RWD Chevy sedan is a big car (Around Charger sized by some accounts).
It's almost as if Malibu is moving up to take another existing car's position.

Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by IMPALA64
The Impala has midsize car proportions...its almost like the Impala and Malibu overlap. Malibu should be the midsize front drive, and Impala the large rear drive car.
Good to know others are thinking the same thing.
Re: Chevrolet of tomorrow: Back to the '50s
Originally Posted by unvc92camarors
If the Malibu gets bigger, where does the Impy go? I think that's what you're getting at which is what I'm wondering also.


