Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Cheap cars NOW mean Expensive Cars and parts LATER?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 13, 2003 | 09:21 PM
  #1  
johnsocal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
Cheap cars NOW mean Expensive Cars and parts LATER?

If GM is taking a hit with huge incentives and 0% financing now then they might offset this with huge increases in the cost of parts and labor in the future.

Even back in October 02 when I bought my wife a new Saturn Vue the finance guy said GM will be raising the prices of parts and labor siginifantly over the next year or so.

If they cant make any money off you on the front-side then they will have to do it on the back-side.

GM isnt in the car business just for fun.
Old May 14, 2003 | 07:42 AM
  #2  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
While is could be a possibility, I've grown to take everything coming from dealership personell with a huge grain of salt.

Think about it... why would GM announce future parts pricing plans to a dealership finance guy?

And even if he heard it through the grapevine... I still don't put much stock in it.
Old May 14, 2003 | 10:32 AM
  #3  
johnsocal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
He showed me the price differences and the % increase was the largest he as ever seen over the last 8 year of working there.

Maybe GM's going for the Bic razor way of selling (sell razors @ cost but charge alot for repacement blades) by basically moving the cars off the lots at any cost but make it up on service and repairs down the road.

The more Chevy's on the road the more Chevy's that will need parts and service later
Old May 14, 2003 | 10:48 AM
  #4  
Darth Xed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 8,504
From: Ohio
Perhaps... not saying it is impossible, but I'm sure prices increase every year.

I think they'd shoot themselves in the foot if they went too far with that kind of move.

Just my .02 though.
Old May 14, 2003 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
It will be interesting to see how quality holds up if this is the case (make the parts break early to recoup cost?).
Old May 14, 2003 | 04:09 PM
  #6  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by guionM
It will be interesting to see how quality holds up if this is the case (make the parts break early to recoup cost?).
If quality and reliability were being dramatically improved, you'd figure they'd be extending the warranty on your average GM vehicle.
Old May 14, 2003 | 04:58 PM
  #7  
johnsocal's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 1,911
From: Southern California (SoCal)
"Initial quality" is different then "long term reliability" and while I think GM vehicles quality has really improved overall they will have to charge more for service if people bring their car in less because they're made better.

Last edited by johnsocal; May 15, 2003 at 12:17 AM.
Old May 14, 2003 | 05:00 PM
  #8  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
Lightbulb

Originally posted by johnsocal
"Initial quality" is different then "long term reliability" and while I think GM vehicles quality has really improved overall they will have to charge more for service if people bring their cars in less...
Or charge more for the parts...
Old May 14, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #9  
WERM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,873
From: South Jersey
By the way, dealers have been complaining that their profits have been decreasing as newer cars require fewer trips to the dealer. This is not just GM dealers, either.
Old May 14, 2003 | 05:57 PM
  #10  
redzed's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,954
Originally posted by WERM
By the way, dealers have been complaining that their profits have been decreasing as newer cars require fewer trips to the dealer. This is not just GM dealers, either.
The carmakers must be doing something right if the dealers are complaining. Personally, I wish GM and the other manufacturers would run all of their franchisees out of business. It's time that cars were sold by direct sales.

The dealer franchise system has lead to tremendous abuses of the consumer, and it definitely needs to end. It probably won't as long as there are corrupt state legislators protecting dealers.
Old May 15, 2003 | 12:06 AM
  #11  
Evil Turbo SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 781
From: Houston TX (Chicago/Evanston IL)
Dealerships have always made there money in the shop. More than two thirds.
Old May 15, 2003 | 05:48 AM
  #12  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally posted by Evil Turbo SS
Dealerships have always made there money in the shop. More than two thirds.
That, and used cars.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIGCOWL-IMP
Parts For Sale
0
Dec 19, 2014 06:59 AM
cmdeshon
New Member Introduction
3
Dec 12, 2014 10:51 PM
USAirman93
General 1967-2002 F-Body Tech
4
Nov 24, 2014 03:37 PM
one wicked element
Site Help and Suggestions
3
Aug 7, 2002 03:11 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 AM.