Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Challenger R/T Classic

Old Jan 15, 2009 | 05:12 PM
  #16  
HuJass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
MSRP on the Collector Edition package for the '02 Trans Am was $3k.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
2lane69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 270
From: Minneapolis
I recently sold a Jeep Rubicon with the $5K 'Tomb Raider' package, which had a lot of content....didn't sell for a dollar more used than a regular one. Chrysler is the king of pointless special editions...damn near everything they sell has a numbered plaque on it. You'll be able to buy it for little more than an R/T. Nobody should be paying MSRP for one of these.

I'm surprised someone with a Reventon is complaining about the price of a Challenger /sarcasm. Although I do agree, I sure wouldn't buy one for over $30K...I know I can get one at a severe discount in about 2 years....that goes for the Camaro and Mustangs as well.

Last edited by 2lane69; Jan 16, 2009 at 02:20 PM.
Old Jan 16, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #18  
2lane69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 270
From: Minneapolis
Per Jalopnik:

'The 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic starts at $34,005 (including $725 destination) and is available for ordering now at Dodge dealerships.'

I dunno what the base MSRP is, or what exactly this comes with besides the 20's and stripes that is comparable from the option sheet, so you'll have to do your own math on this one....
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 10:07 AM
  #19  
slt's Avatar
slt
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,024
Originally Posted by 2lane69
I sure wouldn't buy one for over $30K...I know I can get one at a severe discount in about 2 years....that goes for the Camaro and Mustangs as well.
Thats the beauty of domestics. We just picked up a convertible G6 for the wife. It stickered for $33K new, we bought it 6 months old for $19K Since it has less than 12K miles, it still qualifies as a new car and on top of the 100K mile warranty, you get an additional 1year/12K miles bumper to bumper b/c its GM certified.

Last edited by slt; Jan 17, 2009 at 10:09 AM.
Old Jan 17, 2009 | 11:55 AM
  #20  
formula-bird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 135
From: Beans Cove, PA
I don't mind it. But if they was going for he 1970 look. Then why did they put 1971 style stripes on it?
Old Jan 19, 2009 | 06:15 PM
  #21  
King Moose SS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,069
From: Detroit, MI
I went to the autoshow in Detroit and saw it. It's basically the same idea as the new Daytona Charger R/T
Old Jan 20, 2009 | 05:36 PM
  #22  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by 2lane69
Per Jalopnik:

'The 2009 Dodge Challenger R/T Classic starts at $34,005 (including $725 destination) and is available for ordering now at Dodge dealerships.'

I dunno what the base MSRP is, or what exactly this comes with besides the 20's and stripes that is comparable from the option sheet, so you'll have to do your own math on this one....
Yep. 4K more. Includes more than decals. Different grille, SRT8 fuel filler door, different exhaust, and those Crager-ish mag wheels.

IMO, not very different than the price of the 35th Camaro SS and T/A anniversary packages, which were themselves basically a wheel, paint and decal package as well.

Originally Posted by the pool boy
I'm not buying a Challenger. I was simply relaying information to you of what I have seen around town. I'm not trying to be argumentative. I only say it because you guys assume this special edition will be cheap. How much was the wheel and stripe package on the 35th SS Camaros? How much was the CE package on Trans Ams? How much are the C/S Mustangs and other variant special edition Mustangs? Special editions can drive up the price of a car very quickly.

Here is a link to the dealer I went to - only one R/T they have MSRPs for less than $34k, and the rest are above $37k. I'm not crazy.

http://www.hayeschrysler.com/?http:/...ype_select=new
You may not be crazy, but... the 35th Camaro SS was on sale SEVEN years ago!!!

Seven years ago, one could get a base Z28 and Mustang GT for only 21K MSRP. Today, the GT costs $26K and the SS will cost $29K. Reaching back that far to compare prices on a Challenger R/T is (at the very least) extremely flawed because inflation has moved prices (and wages) up significantly since 2002.

Any price above MSRP is on the dealer not the manufacturer. The point you were making (and you stated as much) was that the Challenger was overpriced. Not only is it not overpriced, a base Challenger R/T is roughly an oil change cheaper than a Camaro SS.

That is enough to make it the cheapest V8 powered, rear drive, IRS, new car on sale in the United States.

In all fairness, although Camaro SS is more expensive than the Challenger R/T (if you can call less than $20 more expensive) Camaro SS is the cheapest car you can get with at least 400 horsepower.

Next cheapest?

Dodge Challenger SRT8.

Last edited by guionM; Jan 20, 2009 at 05:55 PM.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 06:17 AM
  #23  
the pool boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 137
From: Georgia
You're missing my point. I was trying to say that this particular option package would not be a drop in the bucket, and that adding it to the cost of the R/Ts I have seen in my area would push them over $40k, if we're going off sticker prices. I know that most people don't pay sticker, but it's the only consistent guideline we have for comparison.

Jason E suggested the option package would be no more than $1500. I said that the option package would drive a $37k R/T to over $40k (even including market adjustment!). Who was right?


Also - can you quote me on where I said the Challenger is overpriced? You're the one who put those words in my mouth, and you're the one who brought in the Camaro for comparison (for some reason - I didn't). Who was even talking about the price of the Camaro? My main point was that this option package will be pricey, and if it adds $4000 to the price of a car, I would say that it is pricey.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:00 AM
  #24  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally Posted by the pool boy
You're missing my point. I was trying to say that this particular option package would not be a drop in the bucket, and that adding it to the cost of the R/Ts I have seen in my area would push them over $40k, if we're going off sticker prices. I know that most people don't pay sticker, but it's the only consistent guideline we have for comparison.
If you say an R/T is going for $40 and $45K, you are not going by sticker... you are going by opinion and-or dealer markup.

I suspect I fully understand your point, but as has been pointed out, your numbers are simply wrong.

Jason E suggested the option package would be no more than $1500. I said that the option package would drive a $37k R/T to over $40k (even including market adjustment!). Who was right?
No contest...Jason was right.... hands down!

The Challenger Classic is based on the upmodel R/T "J" package which is $32,480.

The Classic lists for $34,005.... that's sticker/MSRP, BTW.

That puts it at $1,520 over the R/T "J"..... pretty darn close to Jason's estimate if you ask me.

The regular R/T starts at $30,545.

The regular Camaro SS is $30,995.

The Camaro 2SS (comparable to the R/T's "J" package) is $33,430

A scant $565 less than an R/T Classic.... probably the price of a set of stripes and chrome factory wheels for the 2SS, which would make the price difference a wash.


Again, hardly the mega-buck vehicle you are trying to make it out to be.

Also - can you quote me on where I said the Challenger is overpriced? You're the one who put those words in my mouth, and you're the one who brought in the Camaro for comparison (for some reason - I didn't). Who was even talking about the price of the Camaro? My main point was that this option package will be pricey, and if it adds $4000 to the price of a car, I would say that it is pricey.
You are attempting to paint the Challenger R/T as overpriced, then are attempting to deny this is your intention.

Here is what you posted:

Originally Posted by the pool boy
This can be yours for $45,000 (i'm guessing).
and this....

Originally Posted by the pool boy
I have seen $37k on stickers on R/Ts around here. That's even without MyGig. And, this is me going out to the dealerships and looking at the physical window sticker, not browsing on the internet. Add wheels, decals, a working hoodscoop and whatever is underneath it, and the dreaded "Market Adjustment," and you're well over $40k.
Then....

Originally Posted by the pool boy
....I know that most people don't pay sticker, but it's the only consistent guideline we have for comparison.
You are right, MSRP (or "sticker") is the constant on all pricing, and I agree with you 100% that this is what should be used by in all comparisons. I discard discounts and incentives because they vary by area and sales. Therfore, I also dismiss dealer markups because they also are local situations and vary from dealer to dealer not to mention area to area.

I brought in Camaro SS to prove that the pricing of the Challenger R/T (even the Classic) is by no means high or off kilter, as a retort to your posts, backed up by examples and facts.

One can load up a $26K Mustang GT with options to well into the $30K range, but no one is going to use it as an example of actual prices of a Mustang GT. Therefore, using $37K as a normal price of an R/T isn't exactly accurate either.

If dealers are marking it up in your area, that's a local dealer issue. I once saw a G8 GT here in the Bay Area listed for over $40K despite having a list price of only $29K. That was a dealer issue in my area, not an issue that Pontiac priced it too high.

Same goes over the Challenger.... and likely the Camaro when it comes out.

Last edited by guionM; Jan 21, 2009 at 07:44 AM.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 08:13 AM
  #25  
the pool boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 137
From: Georgia
How is Jason right when he said the package would be no more than $1500 when it is a $4000 package?

How am I not right in saying that 37,000 + 4,000 = 41,000? Even if the R/T cost $20,000, a $4,000 option package will make it $24,000. Regardless of the price of the vehicle, a $4,000 option package will increase the price of the vehicle $4,000.
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 02:31 PM
  #26  
AdioSS's Avatar
West South Central Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,371
From: Kilgore TX 75662
I'm guessing that the numbers you guys are talking are if you were to walk up to the dealership with a black check or a pocket full of $100s, and NOT with financing and paying interest over a few years like most people do that ends up costing them thousands more than they were expecting
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 03:47 PM
  #27  
the pool boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 137
From: Georgia
Originally Posted by AdioSS
I'm guessing that the numbers you guys are talking are if you were to walk up to the dealership with a black check or a pocket full of $100s, and NOT with financing and paying interest over a few years like most people do that ends up costing them thousands more than they were expecting
lol
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #28  
ZZtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,217
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by guionM
The point you were making (and you stated as much) was that the Challenger was overpriced. Not only is it not overpriced, a base Challenger R/T is roughly an oil change cheaper than a Camaro SS.

That is enough to make it the cheapest V8 powered, rear drive, IRS, new car on sale in the United States.
I'm not sure I would call the Challenger R/T overpriced, but when it comes to performance, the Camaro SS is going to wipe the floor with it for a couple of cheeseburgers more.

Originally Posted by guionM
In all fairness, although Camaro SS is more expensive than the Challenger R/T (if you can call less than $20 more expensive) Camaro SS is the cheapest car you can get with at least 400 horsepower.

Next cheapest?

Dodge Challenger SRT8.
I thought the base price on the G8 GXP was right around the same if not a touch cheaper than the Challenger SRT8?
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 10:31 AM
  #29  
2lane69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 270
From: Minneapolis
Pool boy, the Classic is based on the J package, so we are looking at it in two different ways. Either $1500 more than the J package, or $4K more than base...but you can't really do that, because the content goes beyond just the stickers, as Guy pointed out. You are getting leather, chrome 20" wheels, etc. So, it's really only a $1500 package compared to an equivalently optioned car, the 'J' package. Basically, it stickers for $34K...from there, you have to look at the option sheet and see what you could add to it. Maybe the track pack, sunroof, mygig, etc. I bet the most you could sticker it out is around $1500 higher than those you are referencing.

So yes, your math works, but your logic doesn't.

Last edited by 2lane69; Jan 23, 2009 at 10:38 AM.
Old Jan 23, 2009 | 03:23 PM
  #30  
the pool boy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 137
From: Georgia
Well at least I'm right some how, haha

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 AM.