Cerberus wants its money back on Chrysler deal with Daimler
#1
Cerberus wants its money back on Chrysler deal with Daimler
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...chrysler_N.htm
Cerberus wants its money back on Chrysler deal with Daimler
By Sharon Silke Carty, USA TODAY
In a dramatic case of corporate buyer's remorse, private-equity firm Cerberus Capital Management is demanding a refund on its purchase of Detroit automaker Chrysler a year ago from German car company Daimler.
Cerberus says it based its purchase on misleading information from Daimler.
"The claim is baseless and absurd," Daimler spokesman Han Tjan says. "Absolutely incorrect and completely without substance."
The investment company said in a statement Wednesday that Daimler "intentionally and materially" misrepresented matters involving auto loans and leasing contracts during the period before Cerberus' purchase of 80.1% of Chrysler in 2007. As a result, Cerberus said, Chrysler suffered losses "well in excess of" what it should have and what its competitors did.
Tjan says, "You can imagine in a deal like this, you don't sit around a table and do it. They had their bankers, their advisers, their auditors doing the full due diligence."
The wrangle comes at a tender moment in U.S. auto history. General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler are nearly broke. They return to Washington next week to ask for federal money, this time providing Congress more details on how they'd use it to revitalize themselves. Shares of GM and Ford jumped Wednesday on expectations they'll get a bailout.
Depending on how you look at the numbers, it can be argued that Cerberus paid nothing for Chrysler. Cerberus spent $7.4 billion to take control of Chrysler, but much of it went back into Chrysler, not to Daimler. Plus, Daimler pumped $700 million into the pension fund, took some health care obligations, paid closing costs and ended up about $650 million in the hole once the deal closed.
Now, Cerberus is demanding more than $7.2 billion because of the problems it sees associated with Chrysler. The private-equity firm also is quibbling over tax issues in Canada and wants Daimler to continue running Chrysler franchises outside North America.
The dispute has snagged talks over Cerberus acquiring Daimler's remaining 19.9% Chrysler stake. A Daimler statement blamed "exaggerated demands" by Cerberus.
Chrysler lost $1.6 billion last year and about $1.3 billion the first half this year. Daimler has written down the value of its 19.9% stake in Chrysler to zero.
Contributing: The Associated Press
By Sharon Silke Carty, USA TODAY
In a dramatic case of corporate buyer's remorse, private-equity firm Cerberus Capital Management is demanding a refund on its purchase of Detroit automaker Chrysler a year ago from German car company Daimler.
Cerberus says it based its purchase on misleading information from Daimler.
"The claim is baseless and absurd," Daimler spokesman Han Tjan says. "Absolutely incorrect and completely without substance."
The investment company said in a statement Wednesday that Daimler "intentionally and materially" misrepresented matters involving auto loans and leasing contracts during the period before Cerberus' purchase of 80.1% of Chrysler in 2007. As a result, Cerberus said, Chrysler suffered losses "well in excess of" what it should have and what its competitors did.
Tjan says, "You can imagine in a deal like this, you don't sit around a table and do it. They had their bankers, their advisers, their auditors doing the full due diligence."
The wrangle comes at a tender moment in U.S. auto history. General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler are nearly broke. They return to Washington next week to ask for federal money, this time providing Congress more details on how they'd use it to revitalize themselves. Shares of GM and Ford jumped Wednesday on expectations they'll get a bailout.
Depending on how you look at the numbers, it can be argued that Cerberus paid nothing for Chrysler. Cerberus spent $7.4 billion to take control of Chrysler, but much of it went back into Chrysler, not to Daimler. Plus, Daimler pumped $700 million into the pension fund, took some health care obligations, paid closing costs and ended up about $650 million in the hole once the deal closed.
Now, Cerberus is demanding more than $7.2 billion because of the problems it sees associated with Chrysler. The private-equity firm also is quibbling over tax issues in Canada and wants Daimler to continue running Chrysler franchises outside North America.
The dispute has snagged talks over Cerberus acquiring Daimler's remaining 19.9% Chrysler stake. A Daimler statement blamed "exaggerated demands" by Cerberus.
Chrysler lost $1.6 billion last year and about $1.3 billion the first half this year. Daimler has written down the value of its 19.9% stake in Chrysler to zero.
Contributing: The Associated Press
#4
Sounds to me more and more each day that Cerberus never planned to really remake Chrysler.
I'm begining to think that they planned to sit on the company, shift a as many products as possible from Chrysler efforts to joint efforts with other companies, add some cheap improvements and nothing else to the remainder of the lineup, and resell the company at a gain or use it to leverage the rest of GMAC from GM.
This coming year was supposed to bring a new 300 and Charger. There is supposed to be an upgraded Sebring & Avenger by now. Neither are on the radar anymore.
I'm begining to think that they planned to sit on the company, shift a as many products as possible from Chrysler efforts to joint efforts with other companies, add some cheap improvements and nothing else to the remainder of the lineup, and resell the company at a gain or use it to leverage the rest of GMAC from GM.
This coming year was supposed to bring a new 300 and Charger. There is supposed to be an upgraded Sebring & Avenger by now. Neither are on the radar anymore.
#5
Is anyone really surprised about this?
Pretty typical behavior for a company in that field to make a deal, realize it was a mistake, then look for a loophole so someone else gets screwed. How exactly is a company that specializes in investments going to be able to prove that they were given incomplete or incorrect information from a public company? This should be fun to read about if it goes forward.
Pretty typical behavior for a company in that field to make a deal, realize it was a mistake, then look for a loophole so someone else gets screwed. How exactly is a company that specializes in investments going to be able to prove that they were given incomplete or incorrect information from a public company? This should be fun to read about if it goes forward.
#8
And they brought in a guy from Home Depot to run the show....
I kinda had a feeling right from the get-go Cerberus was no good for Chrysler, and Chrysler wasn't going to do anything for Cerberus, either.
If it wasn't such a messy situation, this 'buyers remorse' might be funny.
I kinda had a feeling right from the get-go Cerberus was no good for Chrysler, and Chrysler wasn't going to do anything for Cerberus, either.
If it wasn't such a messy situation, this 'buyers remorse' might be funny.
#9
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dbusch22
Forced Induction
6
10-31-2016 11:09 AM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
01-23-2015 01:13 PM
PFYC
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
0
12-01-2014 08:08 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
06-19-2002 08:30 AM