Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Car & Driver's 10 Best Cars (2008)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 11:27 AM
  #1  
Threxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Car & Driver's 10 Best Cars (2008)

GM is well represented... 3 of the 10 picks... Vette, CTS, and Malibu.

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...rs_10best_cars
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 11:40 AM
  #2  
graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,887
From: northeast Miss.
Super!
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 12:02 PM
  #3  
99SilverSS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,463
From: SoCal
I'd say those plus the G8, Aura and Astra is GM's best.

The list had 2 Chevy's 2 Honda's and 2 Mazda's.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 12:03 PM
  #4  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
WHAT??? NO TOYOTAS???

I'd gladly own any car on that list, except the Fit...and maybe the accord, but I wouldn't rule out owning one...
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 12:25 PM
  #5  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Dang, no Audis either. What a shame...

Not sure about the Fit, Mazdaspeed 3, and GTI (having driven none of them) but overall the list seems pretty reasonable.

Keep it up, GM.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 12:34 PM
  #6  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
We knew this, the list was revealed 3 months ago.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 12:52 PM
  #7  
onebadponcho's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 954
From: Shelton, WA
No way, what a bunch of crap! That stupid magazine is so biased.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #8  
Silverado C-10's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,897
From: Greenville, SC
Originally Posted by onebadponcho
No way, what a bunch of crap! That stupid magazine is so biased.
It is! It's biased towards vehicles that are more enjoyable to drive...
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #9  
skorpion317's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,209
The Corvette and the CTS are expected. The Malibu is a HUGE victory.

This is definitely a sign of GM's reputation getting better.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #10  
30thZ286speed's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,030
From: Frankfort, KY U.S.A.
Ummmm........This thread is about 4-months late.

http://https://www.camaroz28.com/forums/showthread.php?t=558942&highlight=car+driver

Last edited by 30thZ286speed; Apr 4, 2008 at 01:45 PM.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #11  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
I like it. Im surprised G8 isnt on there. Ive always been confused about one thing though. The Mag COTY like motortrend usually has a criteria of new or different. G8 is all new this year, so if it doesnt make it this year, does that mean it doesnt have a chance next year when its no longer all new? Vette and 3 series are awesome car but is it their coolness factors that override the newness rule? dont get me wrong, I still love reading and checking them out, but I take them with a grain of salt.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 02:57 PM
  #12  
Threxx's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by 30thZ286speed
My search function is broken... I searched and that thread didn't come up.

Regardless... I didn't see any link in that article, or any more detail on what they said about the cars, or what other cars were picked.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 03:13 PM
  #13  
ProudPony's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,180
From: Yadkinville, NC USA
This is SOOOO bad.

Heck, FORD is not on EITHER LIST!!!!
I guess they are neither good or bad, they simply vanish after a few uses!

I'm waining on lots of these lists these days - especially since the debacle where Honda and Toyota get good write-ups based on PAST years' performances.

Something like this depends so much on how the car is driven, maintained, cared for, stored, etc. I've seen Mustangs with 50k miles on them that were in such bad shape I refuse to haul it home regardless of price... then I see some with 200-250k miles on them that look/run like new ones. Same cars, same years, same everything... EXCEPT owner.

You are better off doing an All-Data search for TBIs or Recalls, talking to mechanics and shop-owners. You'll find out real fast which cars have a good rep and which ones are crap.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #14  
ImportedRoomate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,647
From: Jupiter, FL
Originally Posted by Threxx
My search function is broken... I searched and that thread didn't come up.

Regardless... I didn't see any link in that article, or any more detail on what they said about the cars, or what other cars were picked.
What's worse is you even posted in that thread.
Old Apr 4, 2008 | 03:48 PM
  #15  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by ProudPony
This is SOOOO bad.

Heck, FORD is not on EITHER LIST!!!!
I guess they are neither good or bad, they simply vanish after a few uses!

I'm waining on lots of these lists these days - especially since the debacle where Honda and Toyota get good write-ups based on PAST years' performances.

Something like this depends so much on how the car is driven, maintained, cared for, stored, etc. I've seen Mustangs with 50k miles on them that were in such bad shape I refuse to haul it home regardless of price... then I see some with 200-250k miles on them that look/run like new ones. Same cars, same years, same everything... EXCEPT owner.

You are better off doing an All-Data search for TBIs or Recalls, talking to mechanics and shop-owners. You'll find out real fast which cars have a good rep and which ones are crap.
Wrong thread, Proud?

This looks like you were gunning for the thread about Consumer Reports' Best and Worst Used Cars...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.