Car & Driver 10 Best
And oh yeah, super...the F5 is overweight
90% of this board seems blind to that fact. Or at least they do in the lounge... not sure about here. Then again considering this is an f-body board it kind of figures people here value performance over everything else.
I've never driven a fit but in the reviews I've read it has almost always come out in first place when compared to all of the other cars in its class. I'm sure it's a pretty crappy car to drive relative to most other cars on the market, but compared to cars in its class it's supposedly pretty well built, efficient, and far more engaging to drive.
I'm disappointed to not see the Buick LaCrosse on here but maybe it came out too late or maybe they just don't care for it since it's not at all a driver's car.
I'm disappointed to not see the Buick LaCrosse on here but maybe it came out too late or maybe they just don't care for it since it's not at all a driver's car.
Their list doesn't really make a lot of sense to me. Either pick categories, or don't. They've got 3 lux / sport sedans, two regular family sedans (but for the Fusion, only the hybrid makes the list, so is that a separate category?), two sports cars (Miata, Boxster / Cayman, OK so three cars), etc.
Automobile breaks things down by category for their "All Stars" list, and they name their pick along with a few notables / runners-up for a given category.
Car and Driver's list is a goofy hodgepodge. The Vette's interior may not be as pretty as the Cayman's, but neither does the Cayman's performance measure up to the Vette's. The Fit may be the best of the Fit / Aveo / other dinky cars class, but who the fock cares? If you are picking the 10 best overall vehicles, especially for an enthusiast magazine, cars like those shouldn't even be in serious consideration.
Not that any of the vehicles they've chosen are bad vehicles.
As for the Vette, I'd word it more like this:
Corvette Interior = Outdated / could use a freshening
Corvette Everything Else = world class / world beating (if we include the ZR1 / Z06).
Automobile breaks things down by category for their "All Stars" list, and they name their pick along with a few notables / runners-up for a given category.
Car and Driver's list is a goofy hodgepodge. The Vette's interior may not be as pretty as the Cayman's, but neither does the Cayman's performance measure up to the Vette's. The Fit may be the best of the Fit / Aveo / other dinky cars class, but who the fock cares? If you are picking the 10 best overall vehicles, especially for an enthusiast magazine, cars like those shouldn't even be in serious consideration.
Not that any of the vehicles they've chosen are bad vehicles.
As for the Vette, I'd word it more like this:
Corvette Interior = Outdated / could use a freshening
Corvette Everything Else = world class / world beating (if we include the ZR1 / Z06).
Because . . . that's where the money is?
But of course, C&D is perfect and altruistic, and would not be swayed by the amount of advertising/boozing/shmoozing/who slept with whom, would they? I mean, we totally trust our press, right?
But of course, C&D is perfect and altruistic, and would not be swayed by the amount of advertising/boozing/shmoozing/who slept with whom, would they? I mean, we totally trust our press, right?
C&D's 10 Best is no better than any of us picking 10 Cars we like for a certain model year. At least in the past they had to attempt to put the cars they liked into categories now this is what they judge;
I've never understood how some cars qualify and yet some don't. The 3 Series and Accord are not new in 2010 and yet are on the list. The Callenger for instance isn't on the list and yet falls in the price range and on sale requirements. The Hyundai Genesis coupe in on the list but not the sedan. Why?
There, we sought answers to the following questions: 1) How well does this car perform its intended mission? Does a given luxury car, for example, ride harshly? Does it sacrifice rear-seat headroom for an aggressive tumblehome? 2) Is this a highly engaging, fun-to-drive vehicle in its category? Does it compel the driver to get in and enjoy it? And 3) What kind of value does it represent? How much goodness does it deliver for its price?
I remember one year the freaking Chrysler minivans made it (before they added a separate field for 5 best trucks / vans / suvs).
I mean, they may have been absolute standouts in their field, but one of the 10 best vehicles?To be fair, there is some rhyme & reason to what they do (some of it can be seen in the blurb that 99Silver SS quoted above). It just isn't entirely intuitive. But I just can't fathom the Vette not being on there, especially when it is considered to be among the best values in all of sportscardom.
C&D's 10 Best is no better than any of us picking 10 Cars we like for a certain model year. At least in the past they had to attempt to put the cars they liked into categories now this is what they judge;
I've never understood how some cars qualify and yet some don't. The 3 Series and Accord are not new in 2010 and yet are on the list. The Callenger for instance isn't on the list and yet falls in the price range and on sale requirements. The Hyundai Genesis coupe in on the list but not the sedan. Why?
I've never understood how some cars qualify and yet some don't. The 3 Series and Accord are not new in 2010 and yet are on the list. The Callenger for instance isn't on the list and yet falls in the price range and on sale requirements. The Hyundai Genesis coupe in on the list but not the sedan. Why?
Challenger was eligible when it debuted, but did not win.



