Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Camaro/Firebird in 2033?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-17-2003, 12:09 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
L.A. Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 163
Originally posted by centric
Okay. Corporate politics really need to end. NOW.

It's not like they're hiding some scientific advancement that will win them the Nobel Prize. It's not like they're great statesmen. It's a simple announcement--we WILL do this car, we WON'T do this car. Stop playing. Stop hiding. Tell us once and for all.

My wife is already signed up on the waiting list for a 2005 Mustang.

I will be picking up a 2004 Viper.

If they don't screw up the Solstice, I'll get one of those. If the C6 doesn't have too many Aztek genes, I'll get one of those. Until then, there's nothing worth talking about.

Anyone at GM listening?
Will you adopt me?
L.A. Z is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 02:32 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
ROTFL!!

I'd like to know what that dude does?!
IZ28 is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 05:40 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Originally posted by centric
Okay. Corporate politics really need to end. NOW.
I think this whole situation goes way beyond corporate politics.


It's a simple announcement--we WILL do this car, we WON'T do this car. Stop playing. Stop hiding. Tell us once and for all.
***Beating head against wall***
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 07:07 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
IZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: At car shows and cruise nights!
Posts: 3,647
We need that post at the top of this board. You guys gotta read better through these replies, its posted so many times. They CAN NOT talk about it for numerous reasons!! Its gonna be a while but the car will be back in a few years.
IZ28 is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 10:56 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
newby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Anywhere but here
Posts: 373
Originally posted by centric
Okay. Corporate politics really need to end. NOW.

It's not like they're hiding some scientific advancement that will win them the Nobel Prize. It's not like they're great statesmen. It's a simple announcement--we WILL do this car, we WON'T do this car. Stop playing. Stop hiding. Tell us once and for all.

My wife is already signed up on the waiting list for a 2005 Mustang.

I will be picking up a 2004 Viper.

If they don't screw up the Solstice, I'll get one of those. If the C6 doesn't have too many Aztek genes, I'll get one of those. Until then, there's nothing worth talking about.

Anyone at GM listening?
Ok, so say they come out and say they're not going to do it, ever. Then what? They can't ever use the name again?

Or what if they came out and said "Yes, we're working on it." Then these arguments would just turn into "f'ing GM, won't give us any details, blah blah blah". So they give us some details. Ford looks at those, at tries to make the mustang one step up.

Right now, IF there is a camaro being worked on but being called something else, it has a pretty big leg-up on the mustang. Ford has started flashing their hand around, so now GM would have a target to meet and beat.

And to everyone (not just centric) I say just be patient, and if you can't wait, buy something else, but quit whining about it.
newby is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 11:13 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Ken S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: OR
Posts: 2,368
Personally, i think its goes something like this: There are a number of us in GM that want to do it, but we don't know what we'll built it to, we'll build it on, how much to build, and how we're going to market it.... cause not enough are compelled to build it and throw resources at it..

Maybe in a few years, if the Mustang sells well, and if GM gets into a better shape, they'll revisit the formula.... If they don't by then, I really believe the 30 year old joke...
Ken S is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 03:01 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
centric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Newhall, CA USA
Posts: 1,023
So I was frustrated when I wrote my rant last night.

But a flip, off-the-cuff remark by Bob Lutz says, "The Camaro is beneath consideration." He's done a lot of what he's said he would do, so it makes me very, very worried about the future.

I'm whining because I truly do want GM to succeed, to come back and decimate the competition. I'm whining because I know they can do it, but I'm not sure that they will.

GM: you have willing buyers. Passionate buyers. And not for SUVs.
centric is offline  
Old 01-17-2003, 07:11 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
WishIHadAZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chantilly, VA, USA
Posts: 28
A lot of these replies I'm seeing are saying things to the effect that GM can't talk about the camaro. Well guess what the just did! The only blunt and straight to the point things ever said about the camaro have been things that parallel this latest statement. It might be time to stop dwelling and move on.
WishIHadAZ is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 12:34 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Meccadeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Posts: 2,473
if he really said that then all i have to say is 'fawk lutz'
thats it
there no more to it...
Meccadeth is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 01:15 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
kizz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Fletcher, NC, US
Posts: 564
Maybe it was a typo on the part of the magazine and he meant 3 years, not 30. I mean the zero is right next to the space bar. Oh wait.. it's nowhere near.. oops. Seriously though, you guys are reading way too much into that. Sounds like he maybe was in a groggy mood that day and didn't feel like answering that question for the umpteenth consecutive time. i.e. He was being blatantly sarcastic. At least that's what I'm hoping. But if he was being sincere, then......
kizz is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 02:02 AM
  #26  
cmc
Registered User
 
cmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston, TX USA
Posts: 681
Paraphrased from Bob Lutz's Auto-Week statement, "Please go buy somebody else's car."

I think it's pretty clear-cut. Either he's a terrible businessman (there's no precedent for this), or he's telling the truth.
cmc is offline  
Old 01-18-2003, 07:32 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
96Z28man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 317
Man,

I'm glad that Bob Putz thinks he's a comedian. After all, he is an awesome performance car kinda guy. I mean, him and his team came up with that new GTO all by themselves......Oh wait, they stole it. That's right. Well, hmmmmm........... At least there's that....Oh, ummmmm..... how bout that stellar malibu, I bet that can smoke the **** off a .....uh.......neon??? no, that's supercharged now, um......I guess it might be able to beat a focus, non svt'd. GM, eat a big one. Time to fire ol BOBBY there. I don't understand how it can be so hard to see the big picture. Oh, ya I do, FAHQ the GM and Camaro loyalists, we don't need you, we are building SS SUV'S!!!!!! Wow, they will smoke any f-body anyway......um, no wait, ya! In a demolition derby!!!!

96Z28man is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ImNraged
Parts For Sale
10
08-19-2018 08:02 PM
njspder
Middle Atlantic
0
05-04-2015 06:48 AM
CaRParts102
Parts For Sale
0
12-06-2014 08:45 AM
tbyrne
Supporting Vendor Group Purchases and Sales
10
08-17-2003 01:40 AM
merim123
LT1 Based Engine Tech
3
04-01-2003 04:15 PM



Quick Reply: Camaro/Firebird in 2033?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 PM.