Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Cadillac CTS-grand national

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 01:54 AM
  #1  
muckz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,402
From: Toronto, ON Canada
Cadillac CTS-grand national

This may spark an interesting discussion.

http://web.camaross.com/forums/showt...hreadid=150611

The thing in the video will definitely kill the upcoming LS6 CTS-V. FYI, it seems that the guy swapped in a GN motor in CTS.

Wouldn't it be nice to have V6 turbo an optional engine on CTS? For that matter, is there anyone out there making turbo kits for these cars yet? May be a good way to add some 60 HP (not necessarily a beast for 11 second passes).

Last edited by muckz; Jul 27, 2003 at 01:57 AM.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 02:08 AM
  #2  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
I'm waiting.......

I'm waiting........


I'm waiting........



.....for someone to say... "THAT'S RICE"!!!!!!!!!
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 08:01 AM
  #3  
steves's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 452
From: chicagoland area
I don't know if that was the day I was there, but when I saw that thing it sounded like it was stock. Someone was telling me it was the stock motor with a turbo.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
Z28x's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originaly they were going to make the CTSv have a turbo V6, I think 330HP was the goal. Then they decided to use the 400HP LS6 instead.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #5  
transam8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 936
From: Butler, PA
Cool

VERY cool!!!


-Mike
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 09:55 AM
  #6  
SNEAKY NEIL's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,072
From: Lilburn, GA, USA
That was pretty cool. The only problem is that I hate the way turbo 6's sound.
I like how at the end, when the time was posted, everyone in the stands all cheered and were very surprised.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 12:18 PM
  #7  
Caps94ZODG's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,748
From: New England
Makes a good case for a new Buick Grand National....hmmmm
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #8  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
Just by hearing it I can tell its a GN motor with some good mods, and most guys don't like the turbo 6 sound when i pull up alongside them either....MUHAHAHAHAH!
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #9  
HuJass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,224
From: CNY
Now to me, it didn't sound completely like a GN motor.
When he did his burn-out, the pitch of the engine was too high. My buddys GN exhaust note is much deeper and throatier.
Then again, the intake and exhaust plumbing would be all different in the CTS and therefore would probably alter the sound.
It absolutely sounded like a GN when he pulled his foot out of it after the burn-out.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 06:31 PM
  #10  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
It sounded 100% like a GN. The turbo had the high pitch whine not the motor. I just got done watching videos of about 200 runs at our buick picnic yesterday, not to mention watching the same videos every damn picnic. I have hours of tape of these things. This was also posted on tb.com and either the owner or an aquatience posted that it was in fact a GN motor.

Here's the owners thread on tb.com. http://www.turbobuick.com/forums/sho...light=cadillac

There are also other threads to describe how he did the swap.

Last edited by GN1270; Jul 27, 2003 at 07:01 PM.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 07:58 PM
  #11  
SFireGT98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,232
From: Orlando, FL USA
can u say ?

seriously though, that is a very cool combo, an awesome GN turbo 6 in a CTS! bet the guy in the other lane didnt see that coming, hehe.
Old Jul 27, 2003 | 10:51 PM
  #12  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
According to a later post, it's a race built 4.1 block with a turbo in that CTS. If true, it's not like the guy took a GN engine & bolted it in with only a few mods. Do a similar race-type rebuild on a CTSv, and you can no doubt do the same thing..... and quite possibly top him.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 08:49 AM
  #13  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
According to a later post, it's a race built 4.1 block with a turbo in that CTS. If true, it's not like the guy took a GN engine & bolted it in with only a few mods. Do a similar race-type rebuild on a CTSv, and you can no doubt do the same thing..... and quite possibly top him
Its an LC4 4.1 block which is actually weaker than a stock GN motor. He would have accomplished the same exact thing with a GN motor and some bolt ons. I think he didn't want to do it because I don't beleive there are many aftermarket lower end parts for the CTS engine, you'd have to custom do all the headers/exhause etc. The 4.1 block is almost the exact same, dimensions as the 3.8 that is why all the parts of a sock LC2 Gn motor bolt up to it. He is in the process of shaking the car down and has alot more to go for alot less money than a CTSv will cost.
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #14  
guionM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 13,713
From: The Golden State
Originally posted by GN1270
Its an LC4 4.1 block which is actually weaker than a stock GN motor. He would have accomplished the same exact thing with a GN motor and some bolt ons. I think he didn't want to do it because I don't beleive there are many aftermarket lower end parts for the CTS engine, you'd have to custom do all the headers/exhause etc. The 4.1 block is almost the exact same, dimensions as the 3.8 that is why all the parts of a sock LC2 Gn motor bolt up to it. He is in the process of shaking the car down and has alot more to go for alot less money than a CTSv will cost.
No doubt! Used CTSs are getting below the 25 grand mark.

You pointed out the lack of lower end pieces for Caddy's 3.2 engine. Didn't he have to do alot of custom work anyway to fit the 4.1 in there? The 3.2 is a 60 degree design versus the 3.8/4.1 V6's 90. If so, why go with the weaker 4.1 over the GN 3.8?
Old Jul 28, 2003 | 05:31 PM
  #15  
GN1270's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 361
From: Connecticut
You pointed out the lack of lower end pieces for Caddy's 3.2 engine. Didn't he have to do alot of custom work anyway to fit the 4.1 in there? The 3.2 is a 60 degree design versus the 3.8/4.1 V6's 90. If so, why go with the weaker 4.1 over the GN 3.8?
I'm actually assuming there are no aftermarket parts for Caddy's 3.2. It actually looks like he was able to fit the stock GN headers and downpipe, (remember, GM fit an LS6 in there) so mocking up a set of motor mounts I would think would be a pretty easy task. As for going to a 4.1 over the 3.8, you'd have to ask some of the guys who hav done it. I ask and all I get back is more cubes ='s more power. I don't understand because it is known in the Buick community that the 4.1 can handle about 500rwhp, to the 3.8's 600rwhp. I guess if you only want to make 500hp, its a little easier to to do it with the 4.1, and of course, some people just have to be different. I asked on the Buick board why in 3 posts in the title he calls it an LC2 engine (stock 3.8 GN motor) but no one answered.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:02 PM.