View Poll Results: Would you rather have CAFE or a gas tax?
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll
Bob Lutz quote got me thinking about CAFE & fuel taxes
.
The East India company, heavily vested by members of Parliment, pressured Parliment into passing taxes to pay for their Company's money problems. The colonists refused to be in directly ruled by Big Buisness, and revolted...could happen again, since an obvious relapse has occurred.
The East India company, heavily vested by members of Parliment, pressured Parliment into passing taxes to pay for their Company's money problems. The colonists refused to be in directly ruled by Big Buisness, and revolted...could happen again, since an obvious relapse has occurred.
On the real topic at hand. I would much rather see the Gov't invest in more public trans than add more taxes onto gas.
America is very much behind in mass transit (other than NYC and a few other big cities)
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
PS...who in their right mind would call the current economy "crappy"?
Every war is a "Corporate war". Every war is a political war. Every war is opposed by some group or groups. In the end, I see that you simply tow the leftist line. Oh well, we all have to tow one line or another.
I'll tow one that is closer to more free market, less gov't, and more personal responsibility. You depend on the Gov't. I'll depend on me.
I'll tow one that is closer to more free market, less gov't, and more personal responsibility. You depend on the Gov't. I'll depend on me.
Call me what you will, if it makes you feel better...I guess that is towing a left line.
Then go ask the gov't to steal from the rich at the point of a gun and give to the poor. That's gov't purpose I'm sure...yup...gotta be in the Constitution somewhere.
The gov't should set the stage for people to prosper - if they are so inclined - then get the hell out of the way.
Oh, and my SUV get over 24mph! Buick Rendezvous full time AWD...My IROC hits 21mpg...when driving sanely.
Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 21, 2007 at 12:55 PM.
Not different than my point of view, just wish others felt that need for personal responsibility. I've always refused to file bankruptcy, (how many corp's have?)or sign up for Gov't assisstance, I always take reposibility for my actions.(Howmany Corp's have?)
I am happy that you feel a need for personal responsibility. I wish a lot more folks did.
Call me what you will, if it makes you feel better...I guess that is towing a left line.
Again, I agree, what should that mean? Stopping Corporations from Lobbying(puppeteering) gov't into passing favorable laws, ignoring the concerns of the people??
Oh, and my SUV get over 24mph! Buick Rendezvous full time AWD...My IROC hits 21mpg...when driving sanely.
And people used to call me all kinds of names because I was always looking for ways to get better mileage in my "muscle" cars. No big deal to me though...I was proud of my 4.56 geared Cobra that could run mid 11s at the track and cruise down the highway at ~70 mph and get 26+ mpg.
One final word....please take no personal offense to any of my comments. If I came off as such, I apologize.
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
When corporations prosper, guess who else does? The work force.
The problem with the "Trckle Down" economics is the flow has been slowed more and more year after year, until it simply doesn't work anymore.
Just b/c the stats say only 4.5% are unemployed, isn't cause to celebrate. With people needing 2 or 3 of these new world jobs, usually half their previous salary. I could lower that stat tomorrow by taking a job at half my normal rate...see what I'm saying.
Just tell me corporations don't manipulate the masses at every turn.
Supply and demand, the foundation, relies on slowing demand by raising prices...forcing people to stop buying...
One corp making food full of fatning fillers, another selling diet products or meds for side effects of the food(High blood pressure etc)...one selling cigarettes another selling breathing aids.
To be able to stop the madness, but refuse to b/c you're profitting, to me, is Evil with a capital "E"...my opinion. To catagorize that, discredit it, still won't change the truth.
I'm not the enemy, sure not trying to be, but I can see beyond the surface...
Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 21, 2007 at 04:24 PM.
While not the final solution, ever mile driven on E85 is a mile not driven of foreign oil.
I totally agree. Maybe some of that war of terror money should go into building new nuclear power plants and more windmills. The best way to fight the war on terror is to derail that middle east gravy train.
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
I totally agree. Maybe some of that war of terror money should go into building new nuclear power plants and more windmills. The best way to fight the war on terror is to derail that middle east gravy train.
The best choice is wind power. Current costs are 6¢ per KWH
Besides, they don't need oil money to cause trouble. Terrorism can be done remarkably cheaply. The fact is, their hatred of the west is bred into their culture (or more specifically, their religion) and they'll continue to try to destroy us no matter what their cashflow situation.
They will just keep raising the price as the wells slow down. If production drops in half they will just double the profit margins and since we need it we will pay for it. They will never run out of money until the world find another fuel source that makes oil worthless. When we once again become an oil exporter then we will have won.
Exactly -- even if the US became energy independent, we aren't about to give up military/political control of the Persian Gulf region. It keeps the leash on China and everyone else.








