Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: Would you rather have CAFE or a gas tax?
Keep CAFE the way it is. No new taxes
40.74%
Dump CAFE, raise tax on gas, let the market decide what it drives.
59.26%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Bob Lutz quote got me thinking about CAFE & fuel taxes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #46  
posaune's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 455
From: Stafford, Va
Originally Posted by 90rocz
.
The East India company, heavily vested by members of Parliment, pressured Parliment into passing taxes to pay for their Company's money problems. The colonists refused to be in directly ruled by Big Buisness, and revolted...could happen again, since an obvious relapse has occurred.
Partially correct, Parliment was also in need of someone else to pay the tab for the French and Indian War which preceded the Revolutionary War. Parilment didn't want to pay for the British Regular Soldiers (about 6000 of them) garrisoned in the colonies to provide security (a job mostly done by militias). So Parliment began taxing the colonies. The East India Trade Company was tied into it in a sort of Haliburton role.

On the real topic at hand. I would much rather see the Gov't invest in more public trans than add more taxes onto gas.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #47  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by 90rocz
The thing is, Bob, we can't just decide one day NOT to put gas in our tank, not to go to work...we have families, we have to provide for...we MUST buy their GAS...is what I'm trying to say.
That is one way gov't subsidizing and low gas prices have hurt this country. We went from efficient cities and mass transit to suburbia and gas hungry SUVs/Cars. Peak oil isn't too far away and people may have too change change there living style a little. No one says you can't move closer to work or bus train lines.

Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
If people can't afford to fill their tanks the correct thign for government to do is develope/build more mass transit.
America is very much behind in mass transit (other than NYC and a few other big cities)
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:40 PM
  #48  
CaminoLS6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 929
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.

Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 12:49 PM
  #49  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
PS...who in their right mind would call the current economy "crappy"?
Maybe someone who was laid off on Dec 22, again, for an industry wide slow down...
Every war is a "Corporate war". Every war is a political war. Every war is opposed by some group or groups. In the end, I see that you simply tow the leftist line. Oh well, we all have to tow one line or another.

I'll tow one that is closer to more free market, less gov't, and more personal responsibility. You depend on the Gov't. I'll depend on me.
Not different than my point of view, just wish others felt that need for personal responsibility. I've always refused to file bankruptcy, (how many corp's have?)or sign up for Gov't assisstance, I always take reposibility for my actions.(Howmany Corp's have?)
Call me what you will, if it makes you feel better...I guess that is towing a left line.
Then go ask the gov't to steal from the rich at the point of a gun and give to the poor. That's gov't purpose I'm sure...yup...gotta be in the Constitution somewhere.

The gov't should set the stage for people to prosper - if they are so inclined - then get the hell out of the way.
Again, I agree, what should that mean? Stopping Corporations from Lobbying(puppeteering) gov't into passing favorable laws, ignoring the concerns of the people??
Oh, and my SUV get over 24mph! Buick Rendezvous full time AWD...My IROC hits 21mpg...when driving sanely.

Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 21, 2007 at 12:55 PM.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #50  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Maybe someone who was laid off on Dec 22, again, for an industry wide slow down...
I'm sorry you are laid off. For you and the roughly 4.5% of the work force that is unemployed, I suppose it is crappy. From a big picture (which is what I was referring to), I disagree. [/quote]

Not different than my point of view, just wish others felt that need for personal responsibility. I've always refused to file bankruptcy, (how many corp's have?)or sign up for Gov't assisstance, I always take reposibility for my actions.(Howmany Corp's have?)
Is that what makes the corporations "evil"? Regardless, I see a lot of jealousy of rich people.

I am happy that you feel a need for personal responsibility. I wish a lot more folks did.

Call me what you will, if it makes you feel better...I guess that is towing a left line.
"Evil Corporations" is leftists 101, IMHO. Doesn't make me feel better, but that's the way I see it.

Again, I agree, what should that mean? Stopping Corporations from Lobbying(puppeteering) gov't into passing favorable laws, ignoring the concerns of the people??
Favorable for whom? When corporations prosper, guess who else does? The work force. Sure the gov't should be there to try and stop corruption (be nice if they started with themselves). But high gas prices at our pumps doesn't equal corporate corruption or "evil" corporations. Rather, it means we like to burn a lot of gas. We. Us.

Oh, and my SUV get over 24mph! Buick Rendezvous full time AWD...My IROC hits 21mpg...when driving sanely.
I sold my SUV that only got ~17 mpg highway. And people used to call me all kinds of names because I was always looking for ways to get better mileage in my "muscle" cars. No big deal to me though...I was proud of my 4.56 geared Cobra that could run mid 11s at the track and cruise down the highway at ~70 mph and get 26+ mpg.



One final word....please take no personal offense to any of my comments. If I came off as such, I apologize.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:10 PM
  #51  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.

Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
E85!
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 01:27 PM
  #52  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Originally Posted by SCNGENNFTHGEN
E85!
Will never haqppen. It may help but it will not solve anything.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 04:22 PM
  #53  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
When corporations prosper, guess who else does? The work force.
My industry is Auto Working...I build trucks, for the present anyways. And there are a miriad of infastructures that are feeling it too.
The problem with the "Trckle Down" economics is the flow has been slowed more and more year after year, until it simply doesn't work anymore.
Just b/c the stats say only 4.5% are unemployed, isn't cause to celebrate. With people needing 2 or 3 of these new world jobs, usually half their previous salary. I could lower that stat tomorrow by taking a job at half my normal rate...see what I'm saying.
Just tell me corporations don't manipulate the masses at every turn.
Supply and demand, the foundation, relies on slowing demand by raising prices...forcing people to stop buying...
One corp making food full of fatning fillers, another selling diet products or meds for side effects of the food(High blood pressure etc)...one selling cigarettes another selling breathing aids.
To be able to stop the madness, but refuse to b/c you're profitting, to me, is Evil with a capital "E"...my opinion. To catagorize that, discredit it, still won't change the truth.
I'm not the enemy, sure not trying to be, but I can see beyond the surface...

Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 21, 2007 at 04:24 PM.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #54  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
We'll just agree to disagree then, and leave it at that.

And believe it or not, I think I can see beyond the surface too. We obviously come to different conclusions.

Bob
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #55  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by SCNGENNFTHGEN
E85!
While not the final solution, ever mile driven on E85 is a mile not driven of foreign oil.

Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.

Time to get real about alternative fuels, and I don't mean pie-in-the-sky dreams of a fuel cell future. I am talking about fuels that existing automotive engines can be readily adapted to. We should have done it over 30 years ago.
I totally agree. Maybe some of that war of terror money should go into building new nuclear power plants and more windmills. The best way to fight the war on terror is to derail that middle east gravy train.
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #56  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Originally Posted by Z28x
While not the final solution, ever mile driven on E85 is a mile not driven of foreign oil.
Not really true with corn based E85.



I totally agree. Maybe some of that war of terror money should go into building new nuclear power plants and more windmills. The best way to fight the war on terror is to derail that middle east gravy train.
The tree hugging, anti-nuclear left, would fight against nuclear power plants tooth and nail. We haven't built one here in 30 years.
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #57  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The tree hugging, anti-nuclear left, would fight against nuclear power plants tooth and nail. We haven't built one here in 30 years.
Actually a lot of those groups have now changed there opinion on nuclear power for two reason. 1) since it has been 20+ year since a plant was built, the newer technology is much much safer. 2) nuclear is the lesser of two evils when compared to oil and coal from a pollution stand point.

The best choice is wind power. Current costs are 6¢ per KWH
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #58  
R377's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,712
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by CaminoLS6
One point lost in this debate is that energy independence is a national security issue. We must find a way to bankrupt the middle east - destroy their gravy train and you crush their ability to make trouble.
Oil is a finite resource that every nation in the world uses. If we don't buy their oil, there's plenty of others that will. The middle east won't be bankrupted (in fact, they'll continue to grow richer) until the oil wells start to dry up.

Besides, they don't need oil money to cause trouble. Terrorism can be done remarkably cheaply. The fact is, their hatred of the west is bred into their culture (or more specifically, their religion) and they'll continue to try to destroy us no matter what their cashflow situation.
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #59  
Z28x's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,285
From: Albany, NY
Originally Posted by R377
Oil is a finite resource that every nation in the world uses. If we don't buy their oil, there's plenty of others that will. The middle east won't be bankrupted (in fact, they'll continue to grow richer) until the oil wells start to dry up.
They will just keep raising the price as the wells slow down. If production drops in half they will just double the profit margins and since we need it we will pay for it. They will never run out of money until the world find another fuel source that makes oil worthless. When we once again become an oil exporter then we will have won.
Old Jan 22, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #60  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by R377
Oil is a finite resource that every nation in the world uses. If we don't buy their oil, there's plenty of others that will. The middle east won't be bankrupted (in fact, they'll continue to grow richer) until the oil wells start to dry up.
Exactly -- even if the US became energy independent, we aren't about to give up military/political control of the Persian Gulf region. It keeps the leash on China and everyone else.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 AM.