Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles
View Poll Results: Would you rather have CAFE or a gas tax?
Keep CAFE the way it is. No new taxes
40.74%
Dump CAFE, raise tax on gas, let the market decide what it drives.
59.26%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Bob Lutz quote got me thinking about CAFE & fuel taxes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #31  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
So you would rather the Gov't tax gas more, and then give that money to someone that THEY think needs it more than you or me? More gov't control of our lives? Gov't is righteous and free-market corporations are evil?

Do you think a bigger tax on oil/gas will hurt those "super rich" oil executives? Is the real problem simply that they are rich and you or your neighbor are not, and gosh darn it, that just ain't fair? And because it isn't fair, we need the gov't to step in and MAKE it fair?

Hmmm....ya....we need a more socialist society. One in which the gov't decides who makes how much.

No thanks. I'd much prefer CAFE to giving the gov't more of my money.

BTW...those that say the extra tax should go to roads, infrastracture, whatever are just kidding yourselves. Extra money into the gov't means extra money the gov't spends on whatever it thinks is necessary - which generally involves whatever it takes to get them re-elected. Sort of like the Lottery that is supposed to support only education. I suppose it probably does. Problem is, now the gov't has another source of money for education, so they use the money previously spent on that for something else...like a pet project in their district that will get them re-elected. Or perhaps more welfare. Or maybe that wonderful universal health care that we should all be paying for.

/rant.
I'm with you, except when you get to preferring CAFE. That is still socialist, IMO. It forces the companies to sell something that isn't necessarily being demanded.

The point of the tax idea is that you are affecting the demand side, not the supply side.

If "we" as a society decide that we want more fuel efficient vehicles to reduce oil consumption, that is great. But that means we have to put our money where our mouths are and actually demand such vehicles with our wallets. Having the gov't institute CAFE but then ignoring the offerings that get good fuel economy is lame on the part of the public.

That's fine if you want it to be a free market decision (i.e. leave the tax idea out of it and just let the market decide), but CAFE is not free market. Basically, CAFE puts the onus on the makers, while individuals can go ahead and buy their Suburban or Excursion or Sequoia and let someone else buy the little cars that will help cut down on oil consumption; there is little direct incentive for them (other than the normal price of gasoline).
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 01:42 PM
  #32  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Originally Posted by Ponykillr
You did not even read the article did you? Of course not. You do not like to read about facts that relate to the issue. You are just the kind of person that listens to what you are told instead of researching and educating yourself on the subject.

Yes there were record profits. Now listen carefully, there were record costs also. Thats right its called profit margin. Say it all together now, ProFteaat MArrginnn.

Lawmakers depend on people like you so they can play to your hearts and stay in power. Let me guess you think "price gouging" (if you can even explain legally what it is) is bad. You think having a trade deficit is a "failure" of this administration. Lastly you think you have a clue about what your talking about.

Pick up a book...Not written by a Marxist and get a clue about economics.
Excellent post. I wonder how many people on hear realize how much money the gov makes off of the oil industry as a whole. Their profits are probably more than the oil companies, and they do nothing to earn it, and have no risk in the process. And where does all that money go? Welfare, Katrina whiners, and a war that will get us nothing.
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 02:14 PM
  #33  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
I say dump CAFE, but gas taxes...........we don't need anymore! The $$$ would surely NOT go to road repairs, it would get looted for other crap, just like they do now.
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 03:02 PM
  #34  
Ponykillr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 561
From: Charlotte NC
Originally Posted by TOO Z MAXX
Excellent post. I wonder how many people on hear realize how much money the gov makes off of the oil industry as a whole. Their profits are probably more than the oil companies, and they do nothing to earn it, and have no risk in the process. And where does all that money go? Welfare, Katrina whiners, and a war that will get us nothing.
F]ederal and state taxes on gasoline production and imports have been climbing steadily since the late 1970s and now total roughly $58.4 billion. Due in part to substantial hikes in the federal gasoline excise tax in 1983, 1990, and 1993, annual tax revenues have continued to grow. Since 1977, governments collected more than $1.34 trillion, after adjusting for inflation, in gasoline tax revenues—more than twice the amount of domestic profits earned by major U.S. oil companies during the same period:

Old Jan 20, 2007 | 04:59 PM
  #35  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
I'm with you, except when you get to preferring CAFE. That is still socialist, IMO. It forces the companies to sell something that isn't necessarily being demanded.
Ok. As you noted though - I said "prefer" CAFE to an increased gas tax. That doesn't mean I like CAFE.

And even with a higher gas tax, you'll still have people driving around the big SUVs - there are plenty of people that can afford it. Someone else will still end up buying the little, thrifty cars.

Bob
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 05:16 PM
  #36  
TOO Z MAXX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
From: Stockton, Ca. USA
Originally Posted by Ponykillr
F]ederal and state taxes on gasoline production and imports have been climbing steadily since the late 1970s and now total roughly $58.4 billion. Due in part to substantial hikes in the federal gasoline excise tax in 1983, 1990, and 1993, annual tax revenues have continued to grow. Since 1977, governments collected more than $1.34 trillion, after adjusting for inflation, in gasoline tax revenues—more than twice the amount of domestic profits earned by major U.S. oil companies during the same period:

Plus all the income taxes from the people that work in the oil industry and the royaltys paid by the oil companies. I cant remember the number, but the oill companies pay a big amount per barrel to the state for oil that is pulled out of the ground here.
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #37  
Ponykillr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 561
From: Charlotte NC
I am just so sick and tired of hearing all the rhetoric from people who demonize the oil companies as if making money were a bad thing. Meanwhile those same people promote massive government spending, laws and regulations aimed at "protecting" us. Liars, the lot of them and they lie for a good reason. They lie to stay in or gain power over people who do not know better.
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 05:47 PM
  #38  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by robvas
I'd start complaining more about your housing prices than your gas prices.
You missed my point. I was talking about the disparity of current prices. Why should two stations located across the street from each other be 30¢ different?
Old Jan 20, 2007 | 09:12 PM
  #39  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by TOO Z MAXX
Excellent post. I wonder how many people on hear realize how much money the gov makes off of the oil industry as a whole.
Subtract out military expenditures and it's probably a net loss for the government. Oil Politics aren't really about making money for the gubernmint -- it's about maintaining the USA's economic position in the world.

Right now, Congress is trying to repeal $14 billion in oil company tax breaks and subsidies. That's a lot of money, and that's just the exceptions.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 02:43 AM
  #40  
90rocz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,947
From: Springfield,OH. U.S.A.
Ponykillr, your post shows me how mature and how many books you've read.
But I live in the real world, you obviously do not. And yes, I read it.
Profit, from Latin meaning "to make progress", is defined in two different ways. (Pure) economic profit is a positive return made on an investment by an individual or by business operations after all costs, including a normal return to capital and returns to risk, are accounted for. Accounting profit is the difference between retail sales price and the costs of manufacture. Accounting profit will be positive even in competitive equilibrium when pure economic profits are zero.
Profit margin is an attempt to ease one's conscience. Read profit above.
Lawmakers depend on people like you so they can play to your hearts and stay in power. Let me guess you think "price gouging" (if you can even explain legally what it is) is bad. You think having a trade deficit is a "failure" of this administration. Lastly you think you have a clue about what your talking about.
Maybe I'm not an econimc genius, but I know right from wrong...and when 95% of America can barely afford to fill their tank while Oil companies declare RECORD PROFITS is wrong, no matter how you slice it.
I also believe Lawmakers depend on people like you, who seem to know a field or speciality, but not much about life or what's going on around you. We're becoming not much more than robots or computers, no idividual thought, but full of others' thoughts and opinions...



Bob, I don't want Gov't control of anything, nor more taxes...how did I come across like I did?
I'd like to see current taxes be put to better use.
Large corporations, again and again, are involved in scandel after scandel...
Do you believe they aren't evil??
Do they care about you??
Whether you live or die, eat or not, as long as their stockholders get fat?
But maybe you are a big-time investor as well.
The thing is, Bob, we can't just decide one day NOT to put gas in our tank, not to go to work...we have families, we have to provide for...we MUST buy their GAS...is what I'm trying to say.
But maybe noone but me on this board has to worry about money..
And I'm d@mned sure tired of my tax money going to corporate wars, (see Iraq...)

Originally Posted by TOO Z MAXX
If I remember correct, didnt this country go to war because our taxes were getting out of control
.
The East India company, heavily vested by members of Parliment, pressured Parliment into passing taxes to pay for their Company's money problems. The colonists refused to be in directly ruled by Big Buisness, and revolted...could happen again, since an obvious relapse has occurred.

Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 21, 2007 at 03:21 AM.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 06:48 AM
  #41  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by jg95z28
You missed my point. I was talking about the disparity of current prices. Why should two stations located across the street from each other be 30¢ different?
Who cares? So the gov't should fix that, too? I suggest going across the street and getting the cheaper gas.

Originally Posted by 90rocz
Bob, I don't want Gov't control of anything, nor more taxes...how did I come across like I did?
Looked that way to me. If I was wrong, then my bust. But how else doesn't gov't control where your money goes?

I'd like to see current taxes be put to better use.
Not going to happen till we see the current politicians put out to pasture.

Large corporations, again and again, are involved in scandel after scandel...
Do you believe they aren't evil??
Do they care about you??
No, I don't think they're evil. No, I don't think they care about anything other than my money (nor do I care if they do or not).

Every large entitity - be it Gov't, Corporations, Charity, the UN, whatever - has or will have its share of scandals and crooks. Sucks, but that's the way it is. A lot of folks go off on oil companies because they have to pay for the gas in their precious SUVs, Camaros, and Mustangs.

BTW...while Corporations only care about my money, politicians only care about my vote, from which they derive power (real power, not just economic), and from which they too derive wealth. So who really cares about me? Answer: Me. And that's the way it should be. I don't need nor want a handout from the Gov't.

Whether you live or die, eat or not, as long as their stockholders get fat?
Don't care. Maybe you should hold some of that stock? Got free market?

But maybe you are a big-time investor as well.
I wish I was. Probably should be. But I'm not, and it doesn't change my view one bit. That is - keep the gov't OUT.

The thing is, Bob, we can't just decide one day NOT to put gas in our tank, not to go to work...we have families, we have to provide for...we MUST buy their GAS...is what I'm trying to say.
Duh. But you know what? I could use a LOT less gas. I could do a LOT less travel. I could carpool more. I could do this, that, or the other. In the end, I don't WANT the Gov't trying to "help me". The gov't should set the stage for people to prosper - if they are so inclined - then get the hell out of the way.

Higher gas taxes will help NOONE. At all.

But maybe noone but me on this board has to worry about money..
Ya. You keep believing that. I have all the money I want all the time. Then go ask the gov't to steal from the rich at the point of a gun and give to the poor. That's gov't purpose I'm sure...yup...gotta be in the Constitution somewhere.

And I'm d@mned sure tired of my tax money going to corporate wars, (see Iraq...)
Every war is a "Corporate war". Every war is a political war. Every war is opposed by some group or groups. In the end, I see that you simply tow the leftist line. Oh well, we all have to tow one line or another.

I'll tow one that is closer to more free market, less gov't, and more personal responsibility. You depend on the Gov't. I'll depend on me.

BTW....I didn't have to worry about money as much when I was over in Iraq helping fight that "Corporate War" as you call it. Wonder why?

Bob

PS...who in their right mind would call the current economy "crappy"?
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #42  
Z284ever's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 16,176
From: Chicagoland IL
Well, I guess Bob is officially back. Welcome back bud.
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 10:29 AM
  #43  
Bob Cosby's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 3,252
From: Knoxville, TN
LOL. For better or for worse.

Thanks.
Bob
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 10:37 AM
  #44  
SCNGENNFTHGEN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,579
From: The Land of Pleasant Living
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Ponykillr
I am just so sick and tired of hearing all the rhetoric from people who demonize the oil companies as if making money were a bad thing. Meanwhile those same people promote massive government spending, laws and regulations aimed at "protecting" us. Liars, the lot of them and they lie for a good reason. They lie to stay in or gain power over people who do not know better.
Right on man!
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:17 AM
  #45  
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,000
From: TX Med Ctr
If people can't afford to fill their tanks the correct thign for government to do is develope/build more mass transit.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.