Bad news for Hybrids??
Bad news for Hybrids??
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blog...s/4219904.html
I couldn't find the whole list of cars and trucks from GM, Ford etc that are coming out in the next couple of years but, the Magazine at the store has a whole write up on them.
Basically, more power, more fun; less weight(
), cheaper, same or similar milage, and much longer engine life...kinda what they were getting at...
Popular Mechanics July 31, 2007 :
PM has previously reported on the 2008 clean-diesel Jetta (click here for video), so I won’t linger on it except to say that it’s a wonderful car—quick and quiet and really fun, even as it gets Prius-baiting fuel mileage in the 45-mpg range
It’s also not the car that most impressed me. Nope, that honor goes to the Euro-only Polo, a Rabbit-like hatchback—only smaller—with plenty of room for four adults, a modest hatch that could swallow a weekend’s worth of gear, and a 1.4-liter, turbocharged diesel under the hood. Oh yeah, and a five-speed manual transmission.
Here’s the kicker: The Polo gets 60 to 70-plus mpg. And it’s really fun to drive. It’s got a good bit of turbo lag, so you need to keep the revs up for serious power, but once the turbo kicks in, acceleration is frisky. And the lag makes the car feel faster than it actually is. I didn’t wring it out, but over the course of a short cruise through the suburbs, it felt like a car I could gladly live with day in, day out. Fun to drive, just enough room for a family, and frugal as all get out. In Europe, the Polo sells for less than $20,000
PM has previously reported on the 2008 clean-diesel Jetta (click here for video), so I won’t linger on it except to say that it’s a wonderful car—quick and quiet and really fun, even as it gets Prius-baiting fuel mileage in the 45-mpg range
It’s also not the car that most impressed me. Nope, that honor goes to the Euro-only Polo, a Rabbit-like hatchback—only smaller—with plenty of room for four adults, a modest hatch that could swallow a weekend’s worth of gear, and a 1.4-liter, turbocharged diesel under the hood. Oh yeah, and a five-speed manual transmission.
Here’s the kicker: The Polo gets 60 to 70-plus mpg. And it’s really fun to drive. It’s got a good bit of turbo lag, so you need to keep the revs up for serious power, but once the turbo kicks in, acceleration is frisky. And the lag makes the car feel faster than it actually is. I didn’t wring it out, but over the course of a short cruise through the suburbs, it felt like a car I could gladly live with day in, day out. Fun to drive, just enough room for a family, and frugal as all get out. In Europe, the Polo sells for less than $20,000
Basically, more power, more fun; less weight(
), cheaper, same or similar milage, and much longer engine life...kinda what they were getting at...
Last edited by 90rocz; Jan 15, 2008 at 06:52 PM.
I drove a 11,500lb truck for the Postal Service in what would be described as severe duty. Inner city mail collection. Sort of like a Fedex or UPS operation and a similar truck. I would drive the truck 2 blocks or maybe 2 miles, get up to 50-60 mph then pull over shut the truck off at every stop. There were over 50 stops per 5 hour route and the engine stopped and started each time and the route was about 60 miles. Somehow the GM 6.5 diesel got 10 mpg. Sometimes even 10.5. Amazing. It also had a 4l80e and 4.56 gears and the aero properities of a brick and I drove it like a typical F-body owner. You had to inorder to keep up with traffic. Then one day I found a biodiesel pump, I talked to the mechanic, he said they are running it elsewhere so give it a try.
The truck used to smoke a little at startup and WOT. It was black smoke. The B20 eliminated all the smoke, I was very surprised. The mpg stayed the same, the filters clogged initially but after a change they stayed cleaner. B20 has a more detergent effect than D2. So it burned cleaner, kept the filters cleaner and the best part, it cost 10 cents less per gallon than D2. The Postal Service used 2.2 million gallons in 2006 and were aiming for 3.3 million in 2007. With 65% of oil coming from overseas its nice to be burning stuff made of soybeans grown in the USA.
Its a shame that all this emissions equipment needs to be on our diesels. It would add $2,50-3,000 to a Polo. No longer under $20,000 then. Not many folks are interested in paying 23K for a subcompact. Add in that diesel often costs 10-25% more then gas. I think Biodiesel is better then E85, the unfront costs hurt though.
The truck used to smoke a little at startup and WOT. It was black smoke. The B20 eliminated all the smoke, I was very surprised. The mpg stayed the same, the filters clogged initially but after a change they stayed cleaner. B20 has a more detergent effect than D2. So it burned cleaner, kept the filters cleaner and the best part, it cost 10 cents less per gallon than D2. The Postal Service used 2.2 million gallons in 2006 and were aiming for 3.3 million in 2007. With 65% of oil coming from overseas its nice to be burning stuff made of soybeans grown in the USA.
Its a shame that all this emissions equipment needs to be on our diesels. It would add $2,50-3,000 to a Polo. No longer under $20,000 then. Not many folks are interested in paying 23K for a subcompact. Add in that diesel often costs 10-25% more then gas. I think Biodiesel is better then E85, the unfront costs hurt though.
Trust me, the major European cities that I've visited are good example of why diesels need modern levels of emission control equipment.
To the OP - is it really news that teeny tiny cars with turbodiesels obtain good fuel economy? And how does this threaten the development of hybrids? What if we combine diesel IC engines with hybrid powertrains - would this not be the best of both worlds?
Somewhere, an article is written on why a Diesel IC series/parallel hybrid wouldn't work.
And yeah, Europe's emissions laws are slightly weaker than ours, same with Japan's.
Some people bash NA vehicles for crummy mileage, but little do they know our air is going to stay cleaner longer.
And yeah, Europe's emissions laws are slightly weaker than ours, same with Japan's.
Some people bash NA vehicles for crummy mileage, but little do they know our air is going to stay cleaner longer.
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant:
To the OP - is it really news that teeny tiny cars with turbodiesels obtain good fuel economy? And how does this threaten the development of hybrids? What if we combine diesel IC engines with hybrid powertrains - would this not be the best of both worlds?
To the OP - is it really news that teeny tiny cars with turbodiesels obtain good fuel economy? And how does this threaten the development of hybrids? What if we combine diesel IC engines with hybrid powertrains - would this not be the best of both worlds?
Bad news for "current" hybids, concentrating on Gas/electric...

I think it's more the use of Direct Injection? that's going to make diesels or small diesels more fun and efficient.
(I wonder if I'll see the "Precept" at NAIAS this weekend....?)
Infact I'd LOVE to see trucks heading in the Diesel/electric hybrid direction.
Power to tow when you need it, yet tool around the city in electric mode when unloaded, where milage usually sucks the most.
And International Truck (ITE) have had green diesel tech for a while, buses in California cities etc..
(I wonder if I'll see the "Precept" at NAIAS this weekend....?)
I hope someone informs the heavy truck industry about this!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
May 15, 2015 08:10 AM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Apr 10, 2015 03:10 PM
NewsBot
2010 - 2015 Camaro News, Sightings, Pictures, and Multimedia
0
Apr 9, 2015 07:10 AM
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
1
Dec 15, 2014 03:09 PM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
7
Sep 8, 2002 04:44 AM



