Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
Originally Posted by jg95z28
What a load of garbage. I'm also an engineer and many of us are liberals.
The gentlemen who Founded RIT, RPI, Cornell, Stanford, and MIT were all liberals. All have excellent engineering programs. Just sayin.

Broad generalizations aside, I wouldn't say political beliefs have any effect on the talent of an engineer. I'd say its all in whether or not they have the knack for it.
Originally Posted by Z28x
Also, fuel cell cars are electric cars. They just make their own electric, kind of like the Volt and Karma does with the gas engine. Volt could be a fuel cell car if they wanted it to be.
That said, the fuel cells running around there now currently have the capacity and technology developed to meet our needs. The problem is manufacturing them for a cost the consumer will accept. By comparison, battery based cars not only cannot be manufactured for a similar cost - but the capacity and technology required to manufacture them does not exist.
Both are still in the future. How far? We cannot say for certain.
But by comparison, things like locomotives and long haul trucks can be made to run on giant fuel cells. They cannot run on batteries.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible

But yeah, generalizations are stupid. I am certainly not going to mind posing auto manufacturers a realistic challenge, and using less fuel is a noble goal, but I do mind when it starts taking away choices from the consumer and/or it is based on some near-religious hysteria.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
I already get 70 mpg on my DRZ400S. But freeze in the winter.
Smog? ... Talk to China. 1 coal Plt on line every 2 weeks. Yes, it blows over to Cal.
Engineers? Not a very popular career these days in the US. Liberals do not make good Engineers. I'm an Engineer, and, have worked with them (and there ain't many of them).
Liberals always legislate technical advances. This never works.
B.
Smog? ... Talk to China. 1 coal Plt on line every 2 weeks. Yes, it blows over to Cal.
Engineers? Not a very popular career these days in the US. Liberals do not make good Engineers. I'm an Engineer, and, have worked with them (and there ain't many of them).
Liberals always legislate technical advances. This never works.
B.
I noticed that Z28x and formula79 are in New York and California. That probably has a lot to do with what they see in the work place, just as my being in South Carolina does.
I will say this though, educated people are often more wealthy and wealthy people often lean towards the conservative side in my experience. Even my wife converted to the darkside after being raised by two long haird, protesting, athiest parents from the Bronx!!!
Now back on track. Someone (think it was Z28x) mentioned comparing the Volt to the EV1 of the 90's as if there was something significant to talk about. Sure, the EV1 was a pretty basic car compared the modern EV's with all their gadgets and amenities, but in 1996 it had a stated range of 70 to 100 miles. In 1999 the Gen II EV1 was released and the NiMH powered cars featured a 100 to 140 mile range.
In 2011 Ford and Nissan are looking for roughly 150 miles (do we know if thats the minimal, normal, or high end of the range?) from their EV's. That is FAR from impressive. It's borderline pathetic.
We have increased weight from modern day safety standards and demand for creature comforts to thank for that though. Then again, 150 miles is STILL pretty pathetic.
And then there is still that little thing about how inefficient it is to convert coal or gas to electricity, pipe it to your house, store it in your cars battery and then turn it into thrust through an electric motor.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
To the close minded?
no thanks. I work around a few, just being around them makes me feel dumber.
I live in NY State, most educated and professional people I run across are pretty open minded.
Kind of the opposite up in NY, the poor lean conservative. Of course I'm generalizing there always exceptions. You see a difference between old and new money.
Lets not forget, the EV1 was leased at a loss. The true cost of those cars was something like $60k-$80k in 1999 dollars. Ford and Nissan plan to sell their EVs for a profit in the $30k range. Tesla model S vs. EV1 is probably a more fair comparison based on price. Tesla is trying for a 300 mile range and seating for 7, not 2.
no thanks. I work around a few, just being around them makes me feel dumber.I live in NY State, most educated and professional people I run across are pretty open minded.
Now back on track. Someone (think it was Z28x) mentioned comparing the Volt to the EV1 of the 90's as if there was something significant to talk about. Sure, the EV1 was a pretty basic car compared the modern EV's with all their gadgets and amenities, but in 1996 it had a stated range of 70 to 100 miles. In 1999 the Gen II EV1 was released and the NiMH powered cars featured a 100 to 140 mile range.
In 2011 Ford and Nissan are looking for roughly 150 miles (do we know if thats the minimal, normal, or high end of the range?) from their EV's. That is FAR from impressive. It's borderline pathetic.
We have increased weight from modern day safety standards and demand for creature comforts to thank for that though. Then again, 150 miles is STILL pretty pathetic.
And then there is still that little thing about how inefficient it is to convert coal or gas to electricity, pipe it to your house, store it in your cars battery and then turn it into thrust through an electric motor.
In 2011 Ford and Nissan are looking for roughly 150 miles (do we know if thats the minimal, normal, or high end of the range?) from their EV's. That is FAR from impressive. It's borderline pathetic.
We have increased weight from modern day safety standards and demand for creature comforts to thank for that though. Then again, 150 miles is STILL pretty pathetic.
And then there is still that little thing about how inefficient it is to convert coal or gas to electricity, pipe it to your house, store it in your cars battery and then turn it into thrust through an electric motor.

Last edited by Z28x; Nov 15, 2010 at 03:26 PM.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
There are closed-minded people on both sides of the "aisle", in all walks of life, with all different beliefs. Then again, someone who stands by a certain core set of principles is not 'closed-minded' IMO, it's actually what distinguishes those who have strong opinions from the wishy-washy types.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
I think what you're equating is open minded = liberal = educated.
For the record, I have a bachelor's and a doctorate and I am anything but liberal leaning.
Last edited by Z284ever; Nov 15, 2010 at 03:38 PM.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
That is certainly a lofty goal and I will believe it when I see it. Also, the Tesla cars seem to be more stripped down from what I have seen so far compared to the Leaf or Focus EV.
And I still contend that there is not a lot of use for a 150 mile range EV. At the very least you will need a second gas powered vehicle to go on family vacation or even drive to the airport (if you don't live near a major one) for a business trip, visit with family, etc. Shoot, 150 miles might not even be enough for a weekend camping trip, unless you can find a place to charge your car in the wilderness, haha.
And I still contend that there is not a lot of use for a 150 mile range EV. At the very least you will need a second gas powered vehicle to go on family vacation or even drive to the airport (if you don't live near a major one) for a business trip, visit with family, etc. Shoot, 150 miles might not even be enough for a weekend camping trip, unless you can find a place to charge your car in the wilderness, haha.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
BS and MS in Mechanical Engineering here and as the ole' country song goes, "you got to stand for something or you'll fall for anything!".
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
All the engineers I know, self included, are conservative for tax reasons. Once you figure out who protects your wallet, and who goes after it, it is pretty cut and dry.
-Geoff
-Geoff
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
There have been some ridiculous arguments in this forum, but whether or not engineers are "conservative" or "liberal" has got to take the cake.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
There are closed-minded people on both sides of the "aisle", in all walks of life, with all different beliefs. Then again, someone who stands by a certain core set of principles is not 'closed-minded' IMO, it's actually what distinguishes those who have strong opinions from the wishy-washy types.
No visible smog over Albany, I've never seen it over NYC either, too windy I guess.
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible
Defiantly, there is not shortage of closed-minded or ignorant people in this country. The ones I can't stand the most are the ones that don't understand things cost money. I'm a math guy and I like to hear numbers. I can't stand politicians that say they are going to cut spending but can't name one substantial program or give any dollar amounts. Same goes for the people that think a trillion dollar war is going to have no impact on national debt or the economy. Same goes for the people that want $99 Trillion of Social Security retirements and Medicare.
Then again, I would be shocked to see an engineer who was not a numbers person.As for the comment about whether engineers are liberal or conservative, it's not really an argument, but us stating observations. It might make a good poll question in the lounge....
Re: Auto Industry Claims Obama's Fuel Efficiency Targets are Impossible



