Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

Audi Q7 V12 TDI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 10:34 PM
  #1  
Gripenfelter's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,647
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Audi Q7 V12 TDI







500 hp and 738 lbs ft of torque from a turbocharged V12.
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #2  
97z28/m6's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,597
From: oshawa,ontario,canada
nice.
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 02:28 AM
  #3  
number77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,428
It can do 220? Or even 200?
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #4  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Nice... the interior has some substantial improvements over the standard base Q7, it seems.

It's really cool how the VW Touareg, Porsche Cayenne, and Audi Q7 are all based on the same platform yet everything else about them from powertrain to suspension and interior is all so dramatically different you'd absolutely never guess it.

Originally Posted by number77
It can do 220? Or even 200?
Considering aerodynamics are FAR more important than power output, and that is an SUV.. I'm gonna say I reeeeally doubt it.

But I bet it sure does 0-150 or so damn quick.

Last edited by Threxx; Jan 7, 2007 at 09:21 AM.
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #5  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,400
From: Michigan's left coast
Originally Posted by Threxx
Considering aerodynamics are FAR more important than power output, and that is an SUV.. I'm gonna say I reeeeally doubt it.
Actually, "aerodynamics" (as defined by Cd * frontal area) is equally important as HP in determining how fast a vehicle will go

But I bet it sure does 0-150 or so damn quick.
That's for damn sure. Best be careful lining up against that beast.
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #6  
2000GTP's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,312
From: Aurora, IL
The interior looks great. And over 700 ft-lbs of torque on tap, wow.
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #7  
5thgen69camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,802
From: Annapolis MD
nice!, the front looks a little buick...
Old Jan 7, 2007 | 04:12 PM
  #8  
Threxx's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 4,320
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Actually, "aerodynamics" (as defined by Cd * frontal area) is equally important as HP in determining how fast a vehicle will go
Well it depends how you quantify aerodynamics, I guess. I suppose my point was most people look at a vehicle and say, yeah it's not too aerodynamic, but damn it has 1000hp so it MUST go 200mph.

Old Jan 7, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #9  
96_Camaro_B4C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,650
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Threxx
Well it depends how you quantify aerodynamics, I guess. I suppose my point was most people look at a vehicle and say, yeah it's not too aerodynamic, but damn it has 1000hp so it MUST go 200mph.

I think that Eric's point is that, by definition, in a vehicle that is drag limited to a top speed (instead of being electronically held back), the top speed is the point at which the available power is equal to the power required to overcome drag at that speed.

In other words, the power output and the aerodynamic profile of the vehicle are equally important (with gearing playing a role as well, of course, as what matters is power to the ground, not power at the flywheel)...

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FacelessZ
Car Audio and Electronics
14
Apr 5, 2004 11:31 PM
smoknta
Parts For Sale
0
Jan 13, 2004 08:57 PM
Hugger SS 2049
Parts For Sale
0
Oct 11, 2003 04:07 PM
JDHarris
Car Audio and Electronics
4
Jun 8, 2003 04:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 PM.