http://www.autoweek.com/cat_content...._code=09000774

From what they are saying the toe on many vehicles was not properly set.

The result has been very bad noise noise and improper wear.

Granted the are making the adjustment... but I don't know that I'd be very satisfied with them just flip-flopping the incorrectly worn tires rather than replacing them.

 

My car didn't come aligned at all. I wanted to put some negative camber in it anyway so I got it realigned right after i bought it making it a non-issue. Alot of Evo owners, though, have tire wear issues just like this.

 

How about stock front camber alignment for the 4th gen f-bod's? For some reason, postitive camber up front is what the factory sets them up with.. I believe its up to .9 postive is deemed acceptable tolerance..

 

 

I like it when that *** stuff is brought to reality.

 

apparently,on the internet,every car is garbage,you got rattling,sqeaking poor quality pony cars,BMWs that burst into flames,cobras that don't have enough HP,mazda's that don't have enough HP,jettas that leak some kind of goo from the doors,350Z with premature tire wear,exploding crown vics,corvette owners with strained necks from all the gold chains.......

 

I thought Mr. T drove a Van, not a Vette

 

don't give me that jibber-jabber,fool!!the T drives whatever he wants!!

 

i've seen this first hand on my sister's jetta. its really bizzar.

 

Now that's wierd. I thought imports had such great quality though?!

 

hope those *** cars dont have the same quality issues as those 90's TT cars had..think thats the main reason all those companies came out w/ only na versions..