Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Old 06-04-2012, 01:44 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by Derek M
Just looking for something more than a short 11 second straight line blast to evaluate and compare the GT500 and the ZL1.
Careful, this is silly talk. 'Ring times and the '13 GT500 are not to be mentioned in conjunction around here, lest ye receive the wrath of CorralDotNetGal and lectures about how muscle cars should only be judged in straight lines as per the supposed history of this site's collective interests.


Last edited by Z28Wilson; 06-04-2012 at 01:47 PM.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 09:54 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Sax1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 604
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by Derek M
Has the GT500 been run around the ring or are there any plans? I haven't seen tough may have missed if this has been done in the GT500. The quarter mile is great, I've got hundreds and hundreds of passes myself running 12's, 11's, and 10's. For me personally running for a sustained period, with a multitude of conditions and situations, using every ounce of capability built into the platform, will showcase everything this vehicle has to offer.

Just looking for something more than a short 11 second straight line blast to evaluate and compare the GT500 and the ZL1.
Looks like the mags are about to start the comparisons.

2013 Shelby GT500 vs 2013 Camaro ZL1 Dyno Comparison Video

And yes the title should be 13 GT500 vs 12 ZL1
Sax1031 is offline  
Old 06-04-2012, 10:20 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 2,887
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
Private owner ran a 11.89 @ 123.2mph bone stock, and 11.25 @ 129 on DR's only.

DA was about 1800ft. 60' on stock run was 2.06, and on the DR run was 1.80.

Car will be in the 10's on DR's only, with good conditions.
Where did the 6mph come from with just a short time improvement? If anything the mph should be the same or come down since horsepower is the same and the short numbers are quicker.
graham is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 02:00 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
94LightningGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Payson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,181
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Supposedly, the stock run was with the LC. LC will cut back engine power to keep everything nice. A good driver will always be able to outdrive someone using launch control.

This would explain the trap speed differences. As a matter of fact, the mph on the LC stock run is amazingly similar to what was seen in Atlanta at the media event.
94LightningGal is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 02:06 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
HAZ-Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: TX Med Ctr
Posts: 4,000
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

If the Launch Control is good, an expert driver will barely make up anything if you have the same amount of grip in between tests.

In the above example you are increasing grip, so you should be able to apply more power. Seems like a lot of mph to gain from that change, which means either the DR's are a whole lot stickier than the stock tires, or the Launch Control is too obtrusive. Perhaps the truth lies in the middle.
HAZ-Matt is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 03:39 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
Sax1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 604
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by HAZ-Matt
If the Launch Control is good, an expert driver will barely make up anything if you have the same amount of grip in between tests.
The one thing is the computer never has control of the clutch. An expert driver is going to work the clutch launching. Launch Control never has that option. It can simply pull timing and/or work the brakes.
Sax1031 is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 04:06 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
94LightningGal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Payson, AZ USA
Posts: 1,181
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

On the ZL1, the difference between LC and no LC is about .5.
94LightningGal is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 05:22 PM
  #53  
Admin Emeritus
 
JasonD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1997
Location: Nashville, TN area
Posts: 11,157
Re: Ford Mustang beats Chevy Camaro in May

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Just remember that this is technically still a Camaro site though (errr - it is, isn't it?)
Not just technically, but actually.
JasonD is offline  
Old 06-05-2012, 09:30 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
graham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 2,887
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by 94LightningGal
Supposedly, the stock run was with the LC. LC will cut back engine power to keep everything nice. A good driver will always be able to outdrive someone using launch control.

This would explain the trap speed differences. As a matter of fact, the mph on the LC stock run is amazingly similar to what was seen in Atlanta at the media event.
I'll buy that.

Computer help is always slower than a decent human.
graham is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 09:33 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 574
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by graham
Where did the 6mph come from with just a short time improvement? If anything the mph should be the same or come down since horsepower is the same and the short numbers are quicker.

It's a good bet that stock tires with LC will be significantly slower in trap speed than drag radials without LC.
BigBlueCruiser is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 11:17 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
It's a good bet that stock tires with LC will be significantly slower in trap speed than drag radials without LC.
I was always under the impression that trap speeds are relatively unaffected by traction. ETs, of course. Trap speeds, notsomuch. Unless you're doing a slow rolling, 300' burnout at the start of the run maybe.

Speed in the 1/4 is always a better indicator of horsepower than ET, which is why a 6 mph improvement would make me raise my eyebrow a bit as well.

Last edited by Z28Wilson; 06-06-2012 at 11:23 AM.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 04:18 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 574
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
I was always under the impression that trap speeds are relatively unaffected by traction. ETs, of course. Trap speeds, notsomuch. Unless you're doing a slow rolling, 300' burnout at the start of the run maybe.

Speed in the 1/4 is always a better indicator of horsepower than ET, which is why a 6 mph improvement would make me raise my eyebrow a bit as well.

Yeah but you're forgetting how LC gets you traction. It cuts power.
BigBlueCruiser is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 08:21 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Z28Wilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 6,166
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by BigBlueCruiser
Yeah but you're forgetting how LC gets you traction. It cuts power.
Well yeah, but again, 6 mph worth? Just seems like a lot. The LC is cutting power for a second maybe, maybe up to 60' at most? Probably more like a fraction, just to get the car moving off the launch. And MMFF said in their initial writeup that the LC was so good, it was the first time they've recommended leaving it on. Guess that theory has been quickly dispatched.
Z28Wilson is offline  
Old 06-06-2012, 09:47 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
Sax1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elgin,SC
Posts: 604
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Trap speeds are affected by traction after you get to a certain point.

If your 1-2nd and 2nd-3rd shift are going to produce a lot of wheel spin then trap speed is going to suffer.
Sax1031 is offline  
Old 06-07-2012, 01:01 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
BigBlueCruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Richmond, TX
Posts: 574
Re: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
Well yeah, but again, 6 mph worth? Just seems like a lot. The LC is cutting power for a second maybe, maybe up to 60' at most? Probably more like a fraction, just to get the car moving off the launch. And MMFF said in their initial writeup that the LC was so good, it was the first time they've recommended leaving it on. Guess that theory has been quickly dispatched.

On stock rubber, yes.

But the comparo is between stock tires with LC on vs drag radials with LC off. I would estimate that LC makes little difference on or off with drag radials.
BigBlueCruiser is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2013 Ford Shelby GT500 First Test



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.