Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion Automotive news and discussion about upcoming vehicles

2010 Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon: First Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #1  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
2010 Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon: First Drive


Conventional wisdom is Americans don't like wagons, imagining them as transportation for unwashed masses of rugrats driven by people who've given up being cool. The Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon resoundingly shreds that stereotype.

The rise and fall of minivans and then SUVs and social pressure towards more responsible and fuel-efficient options is making the time right for the return of the wagon. They offer the gear-toting capability of SUVs, the step-over height, performance and fuel-efficiency of cars and they take nothing from the minivan, thankfully. Their major weakness has been styling, considered the more staid option compared to their sedan bases. The CTS Sport Wagon takes the wagon form to a level of sexy rarely seen in the segment.

An easy gauge of public interest in a car is how many times you're goaded into rolling down the window at a stop light by a dumbstruck motorist excited to know more about it. We knew Cadillac had done their job the fourth time someone stopped us to talk in the same day. The fellow behind the wheel of a Mercedes C-class wore a wide-eyed expression of an eight-year-old at the toy store, which told us what we already knew. This wagon is hot. It takes everything we like about the Cadillac CTS and somehow makes it even better. The long roof-line makes it seem sleeker, more finished — as if this was the original design, and the sedan was cut from it.

Like its CTS brother, the Sport Wagon is one of the best luxury cars on the market. It does absolutely everything right. The interior is beautifully finished, the wood, leathers, technology and quality are everything we expect of a Cadillac reclaiming its position as a global luxury power player. The car benefits from all 2010 CTS upgrades, including 6.5 lbs of additional sound damping and completely redesigned transmission mounts to remove harshness at certain engine speeds.


The base 3.0-liter V6 makes 270HP and our optional 304 HP direct injection 3.6-liter V6 balanced power and smoothness; there's significant thrust underneath the grown-up physique. Sadly, the manual transmission won't be available in the Sport Wagon, but the automatic transmission is well sorted. It's equipped with a manual mode activated by buttons on the back side of the steering wheel, but we recommend leaving it in full auto, as the shifts in manual are a bit sluggish for our tastes. The car is expected to return 18/27 MPG figures, and we saw 16.5/25.5 MPG with aggressive driving, so we're certain it'll do those numbers without trouble. Turn off the traction control and the car will happily indulge your mischievous side — donuts and oversteer are only a throttle stab away and the car is predictable as a go-kart, just like the CTS.

Then you pull into the driveway, fold down the seats, and toss your bicycle in the back. Or a month's worth of groceries. Or the dog. There's 58 cubic feet of storage back there with the seats down, 25 up. The only concession you make to get the massive storage is reduced visibility out the back window. The blind spots are there, but are no more intrusive than the sedan, and the backup camera and proximity sensors eliminate those in tight spaces.

Production on the Sport Wagon started last Monday, and with a starting price of $40,485, the car thoroughly crushes its remaining German rivals for the price. Our optioned-out performance package came with heated and cooled seats, XM radio, 18" Contisport 3 summer tires, more aggressive suspension tuning, a faster steering ratio and stiffer anti-roll bar. Well worth it in our opinion. The CTS Sport Wagon is everything a luxury wagon should be, it's refined and comfortable, not afraid of a little work on the side, and very importantly, fun to drive. After the CTS-V, the Sport Wagon is the best car in the Cadillac lineup right now. Well, until the CTS-V Sport Wagon. Hello, GM bean counters, are you listening?
http://jalopnik.com/5338983/2010-cad...on-first-drive
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 08:10 PM
  #2  
95redLT1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,505
From: Charleston, WV
Motor Trend review....am I reading this correct? No Sport Wagon in Europe? I thought that was the whole point of the car?

If ever there were a car designed to test the marketing mettle of the New GM, this is it. In a sneak peek a few years back, Cadillac said the CTS Sport Wagon was designed to lead its assault on the European market, where BMW 5 Series Tourings and Mercedes-Benz E-Class wagons sell like luxury crossovers. Cadillac expected to sell just 4000 per year in the U.S., mostly to GM's own employees, like Bob Lutz, and the well-heeled enthusiast friends of automotive journalists.

Finances have since put the brakes on the European foray. No more diesel program. No more right-hand-drive CTS. The Sport Wagon has to sell here on its own merits, which are considerable.

Styling alone should make it a sales breakout. Cadillac has transformed perhaps the best-looking modern luxury sedan into the best-looking shooting brake. Its roof extends to a very fast D-pillar and power tailgate. The "finlike" taillamps are exaggerated into vertical light pipes that run nearly to the cargo roof rails. As with the CTS sedan, the Sport Wagon's tail ends in that signature Cadillac vee. It's not the most efficient use of station-wagon space. It's the sleek kind of styling that has defined the luxury wagons from BMW, Audi, and Alfa Romeo.

And unlike those nine-passenger Ford Country Squires and Buick Estate Wagons of the target market's youth, the CTS Sport Wagon's rear window doesn't provide an exemplary outward view. Modern wagons need rollover protection, so a thick rear header intrudes into the cargo area, making the optional nav system's rear camera screen quite helpful. Like the German competition, the CTS' cargo area is a nicely finished combo of sumptuous carpeting and a chrome cargo-management system.

Motivating 200 pounds more than the sedan, the optional 3.6-liter direct-injection V-6 provides plenty of power. It's hard to break the rear tires loose at launch, but the mid- to upper-rev ranges are strong. There's no reason to expect anything better than adequate power from the new 270-horsepower, 223 pound-foot 3.0-liter gas direct-injection V-6, which replaces the port-injected 3.6 as the base CTS engine. Both engines come standard with GM's six-speed automatic. The six-speed manual offered standard in the CTS sedan (which, by the way, has been redesignated Sport Sedan) is not available in the wagon.

More
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 07:06 AM
  #3  
Flip94ta's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 610
From: Akron, OH.
It sure is sexy eye candy but as wagons go the Big Three haven't figured out packaging yet and 58 cubes is pretty small for a 4000lb vehicle. I'm happy it's here, I just hope it's slow sales don't hamper our chances at caprice wagon. I'm hoping a caprice wagon would be availible with AWD and have about 70 cubes weigh in around 4000.

And some one please tell me when GM is going to get it together and offer at least one diesel in a vehicle under 8500lbs. If Ford beats them to it in say something like the Flex Ill be sold. Maybe HCCI will save the day for GM, but we could have had diesels here today to hold us over. There's fools out there paying 28000 for a diesel Jetta and they sell quick, GM hasn't caught on to that I guess.

As for the CTS, I think the enthuasists on here wanted to see the 4.5L in the car but the 400ftlbs of the 2.9 would have been plenty. What do you guys think, 35 mpg to boot?
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 07:10 AM
  #4  
Z28Wilson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 6,165
From: Sterling Heights, MI
I'm still not convinced.

People can stop and ask questions about it all day, question is, would they actually buy one?
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 10:21 AM
  #5  
Geoff Chadwick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,154
From: All around
Sadly, the manual transmission won't be available in the Sport Wagon
Mistake #1.

starting price of $40,485
Mistake #2. (I heard the original goal was within $2000 of the CTS's sticker. Dealers will also likely mark these up at first).

Originally Posted by Z28Wilson
People can stop and ask questions about it all day, question is, would they actually buy one?
Will it sell well enough to justify keeping a wagon around for more than a couple years (much like the magnum)? Thats a good question. But on another interesting note - BMW, Audi, Mercedes, Volvo, & Saab all make wagons of their mainstream line. How many BMW and Mercedes wagons do they even *offer* in the US though?

I really like it. But I wont trade my GTP till I can get a Sedan/Wagon thats sporty, styled, fuel efficient, and has a manual transmission. I dont know if GM will deliver.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #6  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
If the starting price of the CTS wagon is $40K+ and the starting price of the new SRX is $33K+, why on earth would anyone consider the CTS wagon, unless they had to have RWD and a V8?

Performance minded GM consumers might prefer RWD and a V8, however I'll bet most Cadillac buyers could care less as long as all the "Cadillac" elements are there.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 01:22 PM
  #7  
flowmotion's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,502
Originally Posted by Geoff Chadwick
How many BMW and Mercedes wagons do they even *offer* in the US though?
BMW certainly sells the 3- and 5-series wagons in the US. However, BMWs are everywhere on the road here, but I can count the number of late-model wagons I've seen on one hand.

Sales of 4K/year might be optimistic for this vehicle.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 01:59 PM
  #8  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
The wagon looks cool. I don't think offering a manual is mandatory for the wagon. I bet that would sell all of 100 copies.

Last edited by Plague; Aug 18, 2009 at 02:03 PM.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 02:00 PM
  #9  
Eric77TA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,958
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by jg95z28
If the starting price of the CTS wagon is $40K+ and the starting price of the new SRX is $33K+, why on earth would anyone consider the CTS wagon, unless they had to have RWD and a V8?
Just RWD, actually. Unless they add a "V" wagon, the current top model has the same DI 3.6 V6 as Camaro.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 02:05 PM
  #10  
Plague's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,448
From: Irving, TX
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
Just RWD, actually. Unless they add a "V" wagon, the current top model has the same DI 3.6 V6 as Camaro.
I don't know if they will offer a V or not, but if they do, I think a manual would need to be offered.
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 02:09 PM
  #11  
jg95z28's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,705
From: Oakland, California
Originally Posted by Eric77TA
Just RWD, actually. Unless they add a "V" wagon, the current top model has the same DI 3.6 V6 as Camaro.
Thanks. I guess I assumed too much when I speculated they would eventually add a "V" wagon. Now it makes even less sense.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChrisFrez
CamaroZ28.Com Podcast
0
Jan 4, 2015 08:43 AM
mark0006
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
3
Dec 25, 2014 09:50 PM
redzed
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
6
Sep 10, 2002 08:28 PM
jrp4uc
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
12
Jun 26, 2002 01:57 AM
guionM
Automotive News / Industry / Future Vehicle Discussion
14
Jun 19, 2002 08:30 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 PM.