The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by poSSum
I would describe it as inoffensive .... but then, the current Buick LeSabre gets my nod as one of the better looking domestic sedans so my opinion might not carry a whole lotta weight. 

the 500 is a little bland but it's overall not too bad
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by PacerX
The 1957 Chevrolet is, by any measure, a classic - a great car in every way possible.
In it's time it was also basically just a people transporter, just like the Impala.
In it's time it was also basically just a people transporter, just like the Impala.
With respect to the Five Hundred's styling (a topic a few here have brought up), I gotta be honest and say that I like it - a little bit. At least it doesn't offend me and lacks any lines that make me go "WTF?!?" (the Wimpala has a few details that really make me question the sobriety of the design team). It's downright disappointing when compared to the '86 Taurus, however, and that manitude of a hit is what Ford needs right now.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
With all else being equal (quality, price, etc...) what does the '06 Impala have to make it worth greater consideration than the other two?
DCX is inspiring people, face it, the HEMI is a hit...in anything!
Ford 500, looks pretty good to me, sportier too.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
It'll be interesting to see if the Wimpala ever makes the cover of Hot Rod, much less 50 years from now. I think I know where my money's at.
With respect to the Five Hundred's styling (a topic a few here have brought up), I gotta be honest and say that I like it - a little bit. At least it doesn't offend me and lacks any lines that make me go "WTF?!?" (the Wimpala has a few details that really make me question the sobriety of the design team). It's downright disappointing when compared to the '86 Taurus, however, and that manitude of a hit is what Ford needs right now.
With respect to the Five Hundred's styling (a topic a few here have brought up), I gotta be honest and say that I like it - a little bit. At least it doesn't offend me and lacks any lines that make me go "WTF?!?" (the Wimpala has a few details that really make me question the sobriety of the design team). It's downright disappointing when compared to the '86 Taurus, however, and that manitude of a hit is what Ford needs right now.
That being said, that really isn't the car's mission. The Impala is an appliance, and a damned good one for the money - according to buyers, the people who matter.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by 90rocz
Probably: utility, and value...for the "mainstream" buyer...ie:fleet-people-mover...or uninspiring practical transportation.(Rear looks better, front looks cheap.)
DCX is inspiring people, face it, the HEMI is a hit...in anything!
Ford 500, looks pretty good to me, sportier too.
DCX is inspiring people, face it, the HEMI is a hit...in anything!
Ford 500, looks pretty good to me, sportier too.
Now the Impala may not be "Shock and Awe" styling (which in the case of the 300 will wear off soon - I used to think they were cool, but now I'm leaning towards ugly
). But the Impala is nicly styled (especially the refresh) and it is FWD (+ for a Family Car). Also, the High Performance version does have a V8, but the DOD definitely improves the fuel efficiency. To me and a family (=99.5% Impala owners) these are good things...
Last edited by Chrome383Z; May 25, 2005 at 08:09 AM.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Again, let's face reality:
Impala will outsell Charger and/or Five Hundred by a two-to-one margin, and probably even more than that....
Impala will outsell Charger and/or Five Hundred by a two-to-one margin, and probably even more than that....
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by PacerX
That being said, that really isn't the car's mission. The Impala is an appliance, and a damned good one for the money - according to buyers, the people who matter.
But is it so wrong, so anathema to the world order, to simply have some slight semblance of style, or pleasing aesthetics....even in an appliance?
It doesn't need to be voluptuous like an Italian exotic, just maybe not so painful to look at every single day.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by Z284ever
Sure, it's an appliance.
But is it so wrong, so anathema to the world order, to simply have some slight semblance of style, or pleasing aesthetics....even in an appliance?
It doesn't need to be voluptuous like an Italian exotic, just maybe not so painful to look at every single day.
But is it so wrong, so anathema to the world order, to simply have some slight semblance of style, or pleasing aesthetics....even in an appliance?
It doesn't need to be voluptuous like an Italian exotic, just maybe not so painful to look at every single day.

If anything is painful to look at, it would be the LX cars (imho). The FiveHundred is certainly conservative, but it is MUCH more handsome than those bloated, horribly proportioned pigs from DCX.
Without the 'hemi' marketing trick, the LX cars would not be the darlings they are today. Remember, in their time, the LH cars were considered to have bold and daring styling, but they didn't have the Hemi (or rwd), so they were not ridiculously hyped like the LX cars.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
...Without the 'hemi' marketing trick, the LX cars would not be the darlings they are today. Remember, in their time, the LH cars were considered to have bold and daring styling, but they didn't have the Hemi (or rwd), so they were not ridiculously hyped like the LX cars.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by guionM
Gotta disagree. Even if DCX has stuck the cars with the 4.7 OHC V8, I'd be willing to bet the'd still make a ruckus on the automotive scene. The ridiculously powered "Hemi C" just cemented the excitement.
But I don't think the public would be frothing at the mouth without the word "Hemi" on the car. The 4.7L in that car would have been eaten by the S/C 3800 in the Impy and Grand Prix.
Some ruckus, sure. But not to the stupid, almost mythical level they have achieved. JMHO.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
What the hell is painful about the new Impala? Or the current one, for that matter? (FWIW, I like the current one, but find the new one to be prettier and much more refined looking). 
.

.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by Z284ever
The '06 Impala SS's wheels, cause me great pain to look at.

Of course, wheels are a relatively cheap fix. It would be a little harder to fix the ugly that is built into the DNA of the LX cars.
New dash with lower mounting points, shorter firewall, lower beltline/taller greenhouse, new front ends, etc. etc.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Sure, they'd still make a splash (as did the LH cars at the time), based on the styling boldness alone. Plus, the switch back to cab-backward and rwd made them noteworthy, much like the over-hyped "cabforward" line of the LH cars. So they'd still get plenty of attention.
But I don't think the public would be frothing at the mouth without the word "Hemi" on the car. The 4.7L in that car would have been eaten by the S/C 3800 in the Impy and Grand Prix.
Some ruckus, sure. But not to the stupid, almost mythical level they have achieved. JMHO.
But I don't think the public would be frothing at the mouth without the word "Hemi" on the car. The 4.7L in that car would have been eaten by the S/C 3800 in the Impy and Grand Prix.
Some ruckus, sure. But not to the stupid, almost mythical level they have achieved. JMHO.

Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
Originally Posted by 96_Camaro_B4C
Oh, ok. I agree that they could be better, but they don't go so far as to cause me pain. 
Of course, wheels are a relatively cheap fix. It would be a little harder to fix the ugly that is built into the DNA of the LX cars.
New dash with lower mounting points, shorter firewall, lower beltline/taller greenhouse, new front ends, etc. etc.

Of course, wheels are a relatively cheap fix. It would be a little harder to fix the ugly that is built into the DNA of the LX cars.
New dash with lower mounting points, shorter firewall, lower beltline/taller greenhouse, new front ends, etc. etc.
Re: The 2006 Impala vs Charger (high performance) and the 500 (AWD)
the way i see it, the people on this site usually don't like the things that sell so well (like the current impy)
so i predict it will sell pretty damn well
so i predict it will sell pretty damn well


