2005 mustang haters....come on in
Originally Posted by uluz28
I fail to see how is a "canned" tune.
posted by EVIL5LITER
RWHP on the dyno for that car was 294rwhp with a mail order tune (we wanted real world performance numbers, not custom, one off dyno numbers that are difficult to duplicate for the average consumer), with the ET streets on the car. Assuming 3-4rwhp loss for the sticky tires, you have right around 300rwhp.
RWHP on the dyno for that car was 294rwhp with a mail order tune (we wanted real world performance numbers, not custom, one off dyno numbers that are difficult to duplicate for the average consumer), with the ET streets on the car. Assuming 3-4rwhp loss for the sticky tires, you have right around 300rwhp.
I'm sure there are some (like yourself) who will nitpick the details, but the car went 12.4...good launch, bad launch...whatever.
S.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
That thing must of been pulling mean 60 ft and 1/8 times to be running 12.43 and only trapping at 107. It seems like its falling off around 3rd to 4th gear but then again I guess 4.30's would do that. I personally like the car, but the convertible hasn't grown on me yet.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
Snorman...calm down. We all recognize your Ford fan boy status here. I am not trying to "nitpik" your precious car. I simply read the link that was supplied in the original post regarding the tune the car had (not some associated story posted on the corral).
Again...I could really care less. As I posted before...it is impressive, but it's not earth shattering power. The ET came from the sixty foot.
Again...I could really care less. As I posted before...it is impressive, but it's not earth shattering power. The ET came from the sixty foot.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
Originally Posted by uluz28
Snorman...calm down. We all recognize your Ford fan boy status here. I am not trying to "nitpik" your precious car.
MMmmkay.
I simply read the link that was supplied in the original post regarding the tune the car had (not some associated story posted on the corral).
Again...I could really care less.
As I posted before...it is impressive, but it's not earth shattering power. The ET came from the sixty foot.
PacerX....with 4.30s?
My comment was directed towards KeVMaN's comment.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
Originally Posted by Bob Cosby
PacerX....with 4.30s?
My comment was directed towards KeVMaN's comment.But I did OK for a hack.
PS - I took no offense, just trying to contirbute to the joy-joy feelings in the thread.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
pshhh, I along with others witnessed a guy run 12.8@110 in a 2001 SS with just removed filter and stock tire's at Hallsville. Its a nice ET but nothing a LS1 driver should have too much trouble with Saturday nights out at the cruising strip, especially if said driver has lid, catback/cutout, all for under $400.
This not to mention the fact that the $1000 has just voided your factory warranty on the drivetrain at 90% of Ford dealerships.
This not to mention the fact that the $1000 has just voided your factory warranty on the drivetrain at 90% of Ford dealerships.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
Originally Posted by Snorman
[/b]Just curious...108mph with those mods?
S.
S.
Re: 2005 mustang haters....come on in
Originally Posted by smackkk
pshhh, I along with others witnessed a guy run 12.8@110 in a 2001 SS with just removed filter and stock tire's at Hallsville. Its a nice ET but nothing a LS1 driver should have too much trouble with Saturday nights out at the cruising strip, especially if said driver has lid, catback/cutout, all for under $400.
This not to mention the fact that the $1000 has just voided your factory warranty on the drivetrain at 90% of Ford dealerships.
This not to mention the fact that the $1000 has just voided your factory warranty on the drivetrain at 90% of Ford dealerships.


